STOCK MARKET: Brinker reported that the S&P 500 Index was up and down for the week, closing out at 1335 -- a 7.8 point change for the week. Year-to-date, the total return is 7.1% -- "ain't too shabby in a zero interest rate world."
DOLLAR COST AVERAGE INTO STOCK MARKET: Caller Mike from Lafayette wanted to know how he should invest new money into the stock market. Brinker said: "At this time, I would dollar-cost-average. If you had called at the end of September last year, because we had an attractive for purchase position on the market in the investment letter at the end of last September, but the S&P was in the lower 1100s then....If you'd placed this call in the summer of 2010, we had an attractive for purchase in the investment letter down around 1030 in the S&P 500. I would have told you to put it all in....So at this point at the 1335 level, my advice is to dollar-cost-average the money in at a level that you are comfortable with....As a general rule, we prefer not to chase the market when it's running up. And we prefer to identify buying opportunities when they occur. And the last two buying opportunities that we've identified in the investment letter were S&P 500 1030, and the S&P bottomed out at 1022 on a closing basis. And S&P 1129 level at the end of September last year, and the S&P was in the process of bottoming out in the 1100's during that period of time."
Honey EC: In spite of the spin that Brinker is putting on this
buying-opportunity stuff, his "investment letter" has been in
buy-and-hold mode for the past NINE YEARS. As for the two Marketimer "buying opportunities" he bragged about, he has never mentioned the ones that came
before the last two because the S&P kept dropping like a rock after he published them. The S&P finally bottomed 677 in March 2009, so
those that acted on his mid-1400s "buying opportunity" lost over 50% of
their money. Be warned and be careful about trusting a radio huckster who
dishonestly brags about identifying a couple of bottoms after covering
up several that he previously published.
BUYING REITS AND PREFERRED STOCK: Caller Ken from Virginia asked Brinker what he thought about buying REITs or preferred stock to increase income flow. Brinker said: "I think you have to do your homework. If you are going to put any money in a real estate investment trust, I'd be inclined to some diversified format. I know that Vanguard has one that is diversified, there are others out there as well....As far as preferred stocks are concerned, there's been a lot of money lost in preferred stock. A lot of companies that were getting into trouble, Freddie Mac is an example, came out with preferred stocks and they turned out to be less than people had hoped for. I'd be careful with preferred stocks."
INTEREST RATES: Brinker said to forget about interest rates and recited the current Treasury rates. You can see the list he probably read from here: Treasury Direct
Brinker said: "They (low interest rates) create a level of complacency in Washington. Money can be borrowed at almost no cost at all. In fact, no real cost at all, adjusted for inflation. As a consequence, they keep piling up the national debt. We are headed for $16 trillion dollars and we don't seem to have a political will in Washington to put together a long-term plan, such as a ten-year plan to change all of that. That's unfortunate because this cannot stand over the long-term -- piling up debt like this. Because if and when the day comes when interest rates normalize, the interest on that national debt is going to be gigantic."
BUYING BOND FUNDS AND MANAGING INTEREST-RATE RISK: Caller Mark from Wisconsin asked about moving his bond holdings from Vanguard Total Bond Index Fund into the Vanguard Short-Term Investment Grade Fund (VFSTX). Mark thought the dividends were similar.
After pointing out to Mark that the dividend on the short-term fund is 1.6% -- according to the Vanguard website, Brinker replied: "I don't want to denigrate the other point that you are making, which is that you want to manage your interest rate risk, especially given the fact that we are near historic lows on rates. The average duration on the Investment Grade is 2.4, which is less than half of the 5.2 average duration on the Total Bond Fund. I have no recommendations in my investment letter for the Total Bond Fund. We are not using that fund at this time, as a consequence, I would support such a move."
Honey EC: Brinker is right. He has no portfolio holdings for the Vanguard Total Bond
Index, but he does have a 10% weighting of Vanguard Short Term
Investment Grade in model portfolio III, and a 15% weighting in the
income portfolio.
INFLATION INDEXED TREASURIES....Brinker said: "Five year maturities have a negative base rate of 1%. So it costs you the buyer one percent a year to own.....You have to pay 1%, a negative yield on the base rated and you have to hope you'll get something back on the inflation side."
INFLATION: There were two callers who said that they think there is more inflation than is being reported. Brinker said to caller Ellen from San Francisco: "We have a year-over-year Consumer Price Inflation of 1.7%. ..You have to understand that there are many components to the Consumer Price Index....It is one of the two inflation indexes that best track inflation....The CPI year-over-year for food is 2.8% increase....The year-over-year rate of inflation of Apparel is 4.4%. We have seen a tiny spike in clothing over the last three months."
On the same subject, Brinker told Debbie from Indiana, who said she sees prices going up, that she needs to look at "more than one item" and then he moved on to the next caller.
FEDERAL OPEN MARKET COMMITTEE MEETING: Brinker said: "As usual the questions asked by the financial media were disappointing....The critical question that had to be asked of Ben Bernanke was not asked.....The question that begged to be asked was about the efficacy of a hypothetical QE3 program.....Bernanke has indicated it's a possibility some time in the future....But the real question on QE3 has not been asked of Bernanke. And that is what is the Federal Reserves view of the lag time that would be required for a hypothetical QE3 to have an impact on the economy."
Brinker replied: "I would only use common sense on that. I'm not a tax accountant and I don't play one on TV....Common sense would tell me that when you open a Roth IRA account, the clock starts ticking the day you open that account. If you later open another one, I would think the clock starts ticking the day you open that account. But I would defer to whatever IRS regulation would govern that....I think your best source of information on this is either the IRS -- and remember, there have been cases where people have received misinformation from the IRS and they are then held accountable -- if they followed it.....A CPA would be in the best position...to answer that question."
COMEDY SKIT OF THE DAY:
Caller Ty from Tennessee said: "I have a dilemma about some Apple Stock I have. I'm wondering if I should sell some to raise cash to buy a house."Honey EC: Maybe some of the mathematicians on this blog can look at Brinker's math. I think it might be a bit fuzzy too. LOL!
Brinker: "How many shares do you own?"
Ty: "About a million."
Brinker: "A million shares? That's 580 million dollars in Apple Stock that you own."
Ty: "Not a million. I'm sorry. A hundred thousand."Brinker: "You own 100 thousand shares? That's about 5.8 million dollars."
Ty: "Yes"
Brinker: "How much did you invest in Apple?"
TY: "Roughly, abut 7 million dollars."
Brinker: "You invested 7 million dollars?"
Ty: "Yes."
Brinker: "What year did you invest in Apple?"
TY: "About three years ago."
Brinker: "Ty, if you invested 7 million dollars in Apple three years ago, it would be worth more than 5.8 milllion dollars. Therefore, you're using fuzzy math. This is Moneytalk....."
Jeffchristie's Moneytalk Final Exam Question:
The most frequently heard phrase on Moneytalk is:Brinker's guest today was Alan Blinder, former vice-chair of the Federal Reserve and Princeton economics professor. I think the latter position explains the cost of his books. I won't be expecting many of you to make a purchase. LOL: Macroeconomics: Principles and Policy
A) Hi Bob. Thanks for taking my call.
B) I owe it all to you Bob.
C) Long time listener and Marketimer subscriber.
D) Andy is on the line from Redwood city.
San Francisco, Ca. KSFO 560: 1-4pm (KSFO offers FREE Moneytalk on Demand for seven days after broadcast.) You can download and save the Alan Blinder interview for the next seven days.
31 comments:
I think his guest will be Allen Blinder.
So it was the Blinder leading the Brinker again? (I know Blinder has been on before but can't remember when he was last on.)
I'm afraid I missed it.
It was just too nice a day to spend it listening to a Keynesian clown and a flim flam man.
Sorry.
I did not listen to the show I was out campaigning so I cannot comment of what Blinder said, but I do know of blinder.
Alan Blinder has never been much more than a socialist punk willing to do anything and everything to hamstring the engines of capitalism. Despite the accolades visited upon him by the entrenched liberal media and teh college elite, he has always been a socialist propagandist.
Blinder believes and promotes the idea that Government assisted by academics should control the means of production by rewarding or discouraging production through tax incentives and onerous governemnt regulation.
In the recent past he has championed global warming, not on its scientific merit but on the presumption that it is a convenient entry point for governemnt control under the guise of the public good.
He is the socialist that came up with the idea of Cash for Clunkers one of the most disastrous waste of taxpayers money yet and huge government intrusion into the private sector and consumer marketplace.
tfb
Honey, all college texts are higher then we'll ever be. For example a current hardcover edition of "Intermediate Accounting" by Kelso and Weygandt is $220.31 on Amazon.com. That text was a standard is my intermediate accounting course on a CSU campus back in the 1980s.
On the same subject, Brinker told Debbie from Indiana, who said she sees prices going up, that she needs to look at "more than one item" and then he moved on to the next caller.
I really, really do not like this dismissal. And once again I think in large part this comes back to Brinker’s real background and lack of expertise as a personal financial adviser. Even 25 years ago the CHFC and CFP courses taught the significance of a personal inflation rate. It is also why many advanced retirement specialist were very cautious about inflation protected securities.
In essence people go through stages of life where items in the inflation basket are more significant to them. This is clearly defined by the BLS FAQ on the CPI. Brinker’s response in this instance was unfortunate and demonstrated a lack of understanding of the practical application of the various CP indexes.
tfb
You are wrong bro!! LOL Thats a clown statement.
Carl said: "You are wrong bro!! LOL Thats a clown statement."
Carl,
I'm sure that you intended to quote what Bob Brinker said to Theodore in Vancouver yesterday.
I didn't cover the call because it was totally about politics. I'm sure most readers don't come here to read Brinker's (or callers) political views over and over and over again.
As I recall, they were discussing "austerity" and the caller said that the market reacted to the threat of it. Brinker called it a "clown comment."
It is the third call in hour two of the program about 15 minutes in -- for those who want to hear it.
TFB,
Care to share who you were campaigning for? Are you running for office again?
I did not know that Cash for Clunkers was Alan Blinder's socialist idea.
I was quite skeptical of Ty's call. Ty said he had 1 million shares of Apple stock. Brinker was correct when he said that would be worth $580 million. Ty changed his story and said he had 100,000 shares of Apple. Brinker equated that to $5.8 million. This was fuzzy math since 100,000 shares would be worth $270 million. Ty claimed he invested $7 million into Apple three year ago. The stock was trading around $140 in June 2009. So it is up about 4 times since then. Such an investment would be worth around $28 - $30 million.
It doesn't make sense to me that someone with almost $30 million would be calling Brinker to ask him if it was alright to sell some of his stock to buy a house. I think he was pulling Brinker's chain and Bob realized it and cut him off.
Care to share who you were campaigning for? Are you running for office again?
I am helping Congressman Joe Walsh. He is not my Congressman but we know each other from involvement with the DHS. He is pretty much the only one who held the line for the tea party.
Yeah, Blinder has all sorts of funny ideas about the role of Government. Essentially he does not believe in the private sector as most capitalist see it. He is really into the idea of socializing the risk, and privatizing the profits, as long as those getting the profits kick back to keep the elites in power.
tfb
Frankj --
Ty's call HAD to be a prank. Like jeffchristie said, why would someone with that kind of dough call BB or any financial talk show to see if it was OK to buy a house?
Caller Theodore from Vancouver. Serial caller to conservative talk shows in Portland, OR area. I recognized the name and the voice. He and BB were getting along swimmingly until Theo stepped in it.
Brinker says we prefer not to chase the market when it's running up.
And he doesn't sell into weakness when it's going down.
Therefore, you can only buy and sell when the market is standing still.
Frankj:
Alan Blinder has a piece on the opinion page of the WSJ today (Tues) on the economy. He recommends more short term gov't spending on infrastructure, improvements to education, simplifying the tax code, raising the top rate to 39.6%.
My thought is: Those who can successfully time the market, do. Those who can't, say nobody can!
Oh yeah, I'm now long 500 DDM...and doing well, thank you!
Jeffchristie said he was quite skeptical of Ty's call.
Yep, that's one of the calls I heard and I thought either Ty was drunk or he was spoofing Bob. 1,000,000 of Apple! HA! He wishes!
Well, we all know about that the only reason to listen to the Brinkermeister is for entertainment value. We know his so-called proprietary timing model is rubbish. I wonder if it takes into account the implosion of the Euro. I have studied this a lot and I think it is very possible, and if people don't think it will not affect us, they are deluded.
I have recently been listening to a guy named Ray Lucia who is right upfront when he says timing the market is bunk. But, he has a very interesting concept on protecting assets using his bucket model a little different than the buckets we have previously heard of. This comes into play at retirement when one begins his decumulation phase in retirement. Has anyone heard of him? And I would be interested in your thoughts. I find his concept intriguing.
Mark
Dan G:
Congratulations! You have discovered the secret to speaking on air with Mr B.
Call screener: "Are you an Apple shareholder? Have you been drinking? Hold the line, please"
That call from Ty was almost identical to the one two months ago from Ken from Los Gatos. Remember poor Ken who only had
3.5M in Apple stock? He wanted to buy a home too. Ty may have heard that call, so perhaps he either wanted to brag that he had more shares than Ken, or he made the whole thing up.
Has anyone heard of him?
He is a fun guy. Sort of a guys guy type (ex football player). He has or had a radio talk show. I don;t know your political orientation but he is often on Hannity and did his Financial Friday series.
I never talked shop with him so I am unaware of what his particular twist on things is. As I recall he is a CFP and his educational background was not business of finance. But I am running on memory.
tfb
Because I hadn't yet realized that "timing don't work", I bought 500 DDM yesterday when the Dow was oversold and near support from the inverse H&S "neckline".
Having realized now that "timing don't work", I took my $600 profit this morning and will be heading up to the Russian River tomorrow for some R&R, and to try to figure out why "timing don't work"! :)
See y'all Monday and have a good weekend.
- Dan G
Dan, and do you go to the blue bottle when those quick trades go in the other direction? :)
Any-Mouse asked, "do you go to the blue bottle when those quick trades go in the other direction?"
In the rare instance when that happens, I do NOT sip from the blue bottle. I GULP it!
I don't usually post whole article, but this is packed full of critical information:
by Ben Shapiro27 Jun 2012, 11:50 AM PDT83
The city of Stockton, California, America’s 65th largest city, has filed for bankruptcy. While the media presents Stockton as a sad case of a city economy damaged by the real estate market and frivolous spending on various public works projects, the truth is far different: Stockton has been bankrupted by its government worker unions. And Stockton is important because it’s just the first – or rather second, after Vallejo – domino to fall. Next in line: Los Angeles, then California, then the United States.
Just take a look at the statistics surrounding Stockton. The city faced an annual deficit of $26 million; last year, it faced a $37 million deficit; the year before, it faced a $23 million deficit. By fiscal year 2014, it was supposed to grow to $48 million.
Now, how did Stockton pay for these deficits? By selling bonds. And at a certain point, bondholders stopped buying more bonds, because they realized they’d never see their money again. One good indicator that bondholders were going to lose their cash came this year, when Stockton defaulted on $2 million worth of bonds, instead turning over City Hall and several parking garages to Wells Fargo.
So, where was all this money being spent? On the unions. The city had over $800 million in unfunded pension liability and health benefits to union members; a full 81% of the city’s general fund budget was employee (read: unionized) services. Retirement costs constitute a full 17.5% of the budget.
In desperation, Stockton made cuts -- $90 million from the general fund over three years, including reducing the police department by a quarter and the fire department by 30%. No dice. And they couldn’t get a better deal thanks to mandatory mediation rules between unions and the city.
All of this was fun and games while the economy was good, and Stockton could keep raising taxes and selling bonds. But when the real estate economy tanked, Stockton quickly hit the skids.
Here’s the real problem: Los Angeles is next to go.
Los Angeles is currently facing a $238 million shortfall in 2012-2013; the city also faces $27 billion in unfunded pension liabilities. The annual budget is approximately $7 billion. So we have a problem.
And check out these percentages: for fiscal year 2011-2012, pensions will constitute some 15.4% of city expenditures. That’s not much lower than Stockton’s.
And the state of California has the same problem. The state reportedly has nearly $1 trillion in unfunded pension liabilities. Every year, California runs a massive deficit. According to certain calculations, well above 80% of California’s budget goes to state employee compensation. And the cuts Jerry Brown has suggested are Stockton-like – they don’t amount to a drop in the bucket.
Stockton is just the beginning. At a certain point, you run out of other people’s money – or they stop buying your bonds. When that happens, look for true fiscal ruin to set in.
Read here
Thanks for that article, Honey.
A few years ago, news about municipal / state bankruptcies were quite common, but they kinda withered away. I kept thinking I KNOW the problem hasn't simply disappeared.
Nice to see the Big Correction is finally going to hit. Especially for government unions.
Appreciate the article. Things are going to get worse before they get better, in this arena, in my opinion.
You can vote out the politicians that agreed to these benefits, but that doesn't solve the problem, not as long as the benefits stay in place. And not as long as unions within the same city compete with one another for better benefits, as described in Michael Lewis' book Boomerang.
Chief Justice John Roberts -- a conservative appointed by President George W. Bush -- provided the key vote to preserve the landmark health care law, which figures to be a major issue in Obama's re-election bid against Republican opponent Mitt Romney.
Taxpayer
It's my understanding that, while municipalities may declare bankruptcy, states may not. Sorry, California!
"It's my understanding that, while municipalities may declare bankruptcy, states may not. Sorry, California!"
That's right. The Federal Government comes to the rescue and imposes tight conditions.
All those hard working Mormons in Utah can look forward to paying for California's excesses.
Romneycan
Chief Justice John Roberts -- a conservative appointed by President George W. Bush
Roberts was never a conservative, he is a progressive just like all the Bushs. Progressives like to label themselves as conservatives because hard core Republicans are normally two stupid to realize that progressives will simply lie to advance their agenda.
The Republicans have been the party of stupid for a long time.
Frankj noted:
"Caller Theodore from Vancouver. Serial caller to conservative talk shows in Portland, OR area. I recognized the name and the voice. He and BB were getting along swimmingly until Theo stepped in it.'
I found this Youtube audio that explains Theo's real agenda.
Theodore From Vancouver
Kudos to Bob for exposing this guy.
Dan - if you had held that DDM thru Friday, would have bought you oodles of blue bottles to take you thru the hard times! LOL!!!
Post a Comment