Sunday, August 14, 2011

August 14, 2011, Bob Brinker's Moneytalk: Summary, Commentary, Excerpts and Discussion

August 14, 2011...........................................(post and read comments)


Bob Brinker hosted Moneytalk today. Bob's comments summarized, paraphrased or quoted:

STOCK MARKET....Bob  said: "Well, the roller-coaster was open for business in the canyons of Wall Street. And what a roller-coaster ride it was....When you look at the indexes, the Dow for the week, down 1 1/2%. The S&P for the week down 1.7%. It doesn't look especially volatile but it was......Couple of big down days, couple of bid up days, and I mean huge volatility.....A two-day rally on Thursday and Friday was really one of the largest two-day rallies we've seen in many a moon.  The S&P 500 stands 13 1/2 % below its closing high for the year, and it's been a correction teenager since the 8th of August - Monday of last week.....It was volatility on steroids. What does that do for investor confidence? Probably nothing good. People look at that kind of volatility and say that's crazy and who can blame them."

Honey EC: Bob's clever, but beware. Everything he said was true, but it's what he didn't say that changes everything.  When the S&P was 1292, he said he had been buying (certainly not for Marketimer model portfolios. They remain fully invested). And he bragged that some listeners had been taking advantage of opportunities to dollar-cost-average. Of course, the market dropped like a rock the very next week. He also bragged how he had advised callers not to sell because of the debt ceiling crisis unless they wanted to buy back at  higher prices. As you read this from July 31st Moneytalk, remember that the S&P now stands at 1178.81, and that is after two huge up days last Thursday and Friday:
July 31st, Bob said: "Remember we had a caller when the market was at 1268 at the end of June who asked whether he should sell out of the market because of the debt ceiling debate......Of course, the market is now at 1292, a couple of percent higher than when that call came in at the end of June. So this is what happens. If that individual would have sold out at 1270 at that time, he would be faced now with either sitting it out or re-entering at a higher level."

Brinker's "buying-opportunities" defy logic, but he continues to sell newsletters based on his market-timing ability.  One has to be impressed with the SILLY SCHTICK of being fully invested, dollar-cost averaging regularly,  and still looking for "buying-opportunities." The only possible way that one could take advantage of them is if he/she came into money through rare occasions, like selling a home or inheriting a bundle. 

The truth is that any subscribers or listeners who actually FOLLOW Bob's ongoing advice are only recouping LOSSES when the market bottoms and turns up.  How amazing that he uses market bottoms (which he almost never calls) to pad his reputation, when the only advantage to them for his followers is to gain back money they LOST. 

 INTEREST RATES...Bob said: "And then when you look at interest rates, you say, wha' happened? Who let the dogs out? Three month Treasury Bills 0.1? Say again? No, I don't want to hear that number again. That's too low. Six-month Treasury Bill 0.7? These are annual yield boys and girls. One year Treasurys 1/10 of 1%? You mean I have to own a Treasury for a whole year to make 1/10 of 1%? Yes.....Two year Treasurys, 2/10 of 1%.  Five year Treasury, under 96 basis points.....These are rates to write down, they are historic."


IMPLIED TREASURY INFLATION RATE...Bob said: "Ten year Treasury yielding 2 1/4. Ten-year Treasury Inflation Protected with a negative yield of 3 basis points. That gives you a ten-year Treasury implied inflation rate of 2.3....... 2.7 on the thirty year."


TRIPLE-A MUNICIPAL GENERAL OBLIGATIONS....Bob said: "Gilt-edge quality triple-A, 2.3% average yield. If you are in the 35%  to federal bracket that is the equivalent of 3.5%."

LOOKING AT INTEREST RATES GOING FORWARD:  Bob said: "If you can believe the Federal Reserve, rates are going to be low.....The Federal Open Market Committee convened on Tuesday and issued a statement....They dropped from their language 'extended period of low rates.' ....They replaced it. They said they'd keep the Federal Funds rate at exceptionally low levels for quote,  'at least through middle 2013' unquote. ....They've never done that.....Obviously they're encouraging investors to take some kind of risk, whether it's going out longer term on curve or buying something besides a Treasury....."

ECONOMIC GROWTH:  Bob said: "What they  (the Fed) are expecting here is slow growth. Now many of you know I've been expecting slow growth. In fact, in the August investment letter.....we said that we had reduced our growth forecast to 1 to 2% for 2011.....That's very slow....It's not that it comes as a surprise, we already expected that we'd have slow growth. The surprise element is that the Fed would go out and say, basically for almost two years, they are going to keep rates close to zero."


Honey EC:  Yes indeed, Bob did reduce his growth projections -- by quite a lot!  Kirk Lindstrom wrote:
"In the July 2011 Marketimer, Bob Brinker projects US GDP will grow by two to three percent in 2011. He says he is "slightly more conservative than the revised Federal Reserve forecast of 2.7% to 2.9% growth in 2011."

BRINKER'S MARKETIMER SPECIAL MESSAGE:  Caller Tom from Nevada said: "I believe that your newsletter probably came for  publication electronically before the S&P downgrade because it wasn't reflected in that particular newsletter. So what are your thoughts regarding what Moody's and Fitch might do in their coming ways. I know they stuck with the triple-A, but do you think they might downgrade as well and how might that affect the market?"  

Bob answered:  "I appreciate you raising the question of the downgrade, because I think this has been the most misunderstood item of the week in the financial media. Chances are that you saw in the special subscriber message that we posted online for subscriber access early on Wednesday of this week. We did comment on that. And the comment we made on that was specifically what I just said, which is that this whole issue of the downgrade, I think has been misinterpreted in the financial media. And what I mean by that is, I think that this has really not been an underlying cause of the volatility that we saw this week to any material degree. I think the underlying cause of the volatility we have seen this week is quite obvious. 

And I mentioned it in the special subscriber message that I put up on Wednesday. And that has to do with a couple of things. One of them is certainly concern about the economy. That's a legitimate concern, 1 to 2% growth. The forecast that I have in the investment letter.......The other is what's going on with the sovereign debt situation and what's going on with the banks in Europe......Particularly with regard to Italy and Spain....

The other concern about the downgrade is off-base. I'll tell you why. When you look at the yields on  these securities, you can see that people are not worried about them not pay off or collecting their interest or their principal at maturity...... Nobody in their right mind would lend money to the Treasury for 30 years at 3.7% if they feared a default.....There is no fear whatsoever of default in the yields. Remember this is money coming in all around the world into Treasurys, not just Americans.....So what people are saying is Moody has a triple-A, Fitch has a triple-A, S& P has a double-A plus..... that's a just a notch below triple-A.....And I think people look at those ratings........and realize a lot of politics involved in this....And they don't see a default risk....."

Honey EC #1:  Thanks Bob, for  covering all of those special message points for the radio audience!  It won't cost you anything because you are dangling a much bigger bait, aren't you? It should be illegal, but it's not. I know you believe in Karma. I don't.  But I believe in ultimate just-desserts, and I know that selling a pig in a poke hurts people.

Honey EC #2: It is important to remember that Bob rarely sends out messages to subscribers (this time, he also sent it to many former subscribers.)   The last time he sent out a bulletin was in January 2009.  Those who acted on that "special" message, had the misery of riding the S&P down another 175 points to get to the final bottom. Excerpt from January 2009 bulletin: "We regard any weakness in the low-to-mid 800's S&P 500 Index price range as an opportunity to buy into the stock market at favorable price levels." That was Bob's 5th and final "buying-opportunity" during the 2008-2009 megabear market. His buys ranged from the mid-1400's to the mid-1300's, then the low-1200s as the market declined. That was no roller-coaster. That was a downhill ski-jump gone wild.

 S&P  TREASURY DOWNGRADE:  Bob said: "No question that we saw the financial media talking a lot about that rating downgrade this week. And I really want to go on record as disagreeing with that view that that was a primary reason for the volatility. I think it's connected almost entirely with what's going on in economic growth concerns there and what's going on in Europe.....Money is pouring into Treasurys at record rate.....and that pushes the yields down."

NOT ENOUGH FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY IN EXECUTIVE BRANCH: "Bob said: "I've been concerned that there is not enough concern in the executive branch of government right now. And as for congress, they are responsible for appropriating all the money, as you know.  They've done a terrible job of balancing the books. I mean a country that is taking in $2.3 trillion and spending $3.7 trillion....It doesn't even sound possible. And yet that is the way we are running the country right now."

SUPER COMMITTEE OF TWELVE:  Bob expressed great concern that they will not be able to reach any agreements, and that they will be influenced by lobbyists.  


JOBS NUMBER:  Bob said the jobs number on (August) 5th was a decent overall number of 117,000. The government lost 37,000 more jobs -- federal, state and local. Private sector gained 154,000.

VANGUARD GINNIE MAE FUND (VFIIX): Bill asked Bob if Ginnie Maes would be affected by the downgrade. Bob told him that Ginnie Maes are now trading at an historic high of $11.22 a share, so obviously no one was worried about default. He also said that the payout rates are record low.  He said that he had been recommending the fund basically "forever." 

Honey EC: Bob recently lowered Ginnie Mae holdings in his (fixed) income fund and his balanced model portfolio III. In its place, he added DoubleLine Total Return Fund, Wellesley Income Fund and increased Vanguard High-Yield Fund (VWEHX). 

FIDO KNOWS AND DESERVES A TREAT:  Caller Beck asked a question about the Fed and before Bob could answer, a dog could be heard barking loudly in the background.

Bob went ballistic with excitement and yelled: "Fido is with me. Fido already knows what I'm going to say. God bless him. God bless that dog. What a smart canine we have in Concord. I love that canine. He already knows, but you don't. I'll tell you what....The Fed did what they had to do.... But here is what I was going to say when Fido anticipated what I was going to say. He floored me. He floored me when he did that. He just floored me, doesn't happen every day.......Now I want you to do something for me. I want you to give Fido a nice cup of pinkberry tonight......Some of these canines, they go nuts for this pink berry. So your canine has already earned a large pinkberry tonight, or some alternate treat." 


Honey EC: I guess Bob loves dogs. LOL!!!


  Moneytalk on demand and to go with Bob Brinker, is available for FREE audio/podcasting at KGO810 radio for seven days after broadcast.  I download and save all three hours, including the third hour guest-speaker. (The program is archived in the 1-4pm time-slots.) If you don't download it from KGO within seven day, it's available at bobbrinker.com by paid subscription. KGO Radio Sunday Archives

69 comments:

Anonymous said...

Brinker has just mentioned that on Wednesday he put out a Subscriber message online. Could this be the bulletin/non-bulletin that you have been referring to? He spells out that he mentioned the downgrade etc in this subscriber bulletin. You have indicated that there was no bulletin. Who is correct here?????

Honeybee said...

Bob Brinker is correct. I went through some confusion about how to access the bulletin.

Brinker provided access in a new way with a special code in the email, and it did not show up on his website.

Thankfully, someone pointed that out to me and I now have the bulletin in my hot little hands. :)

However, these facts remain:

1: He sent the emails to non-subscribers -- which was my main point.

2. He did not make any changes in his portfolios or his ONGOING recommendation to dollar-cost-average new money into the market.

Anonymous said...

Yes I agree with you HB, sending out e-mails to non current subscribers was purely a shark infested marketing ploy. The fact that, as you state, there was no "earth-shaking" advice in this current bulletin makes you wonder why he even bothered sending ticklers to old subscribers other than to try to get re-ups from them.

Anonymous said...

"Brinker provided access in a new way with a special code in the email, and it did not show up on his website."

I got a special link in an email to go to the bulliin.

I am a subscriber so I assume that ALL subscribers got the same email message.

So there was a bulletin but it didn't say much new stuff.

Honeybee said...

anonymous said: "I got a special link in an email to go to the bulliin.

I am a subscriber so I assume that ALL subscribers got the same email message.

So there was a bulletin but it didn't say much new stuff."


I believe that is exactly what I said "anonymous," but why do suppose he did that?

And just to set the record straight, it didn't say ANYTHING that was "new stuff."

This was a brilliant marketing ploy. A little obvious, but based on his excessive good humor on the program today, I would say a very successful one.

WOOF, WOOF Fido-Bob!

Anonymous said...

Having completed a course of analysis with his psychiatrist, John tells a friend: "I always thought I was indecisive."
Friend: "And now?"
John: "I'm not so sure."

birdbrain said...

Watching all the uninspiring candidates lined up to run against Obama, I am now convinced there is one clear choice.

HONEYBEE IN 2012

Pres HB would restore America's stature, demand fiscal responsibility from Congress, and guide this nation toward economic prosperity. How? In part by the service of her blog contributors, if I may be so bold:

Pig: Sec of Agriculture. (sorry) Make that Defense Secretary. No nation or terrorist group would dare mess with the Pig, saving hundreds of billions annualy from the Pentagon.

Frankj: IRS Commish. First order is to work with Congress to rewrite a simplified tax code with few deductions, and any added revenue targeted solely to debt reduction.

I'm sure Kirk, Jeffchristie, and DanG would lend their talents as economic advisors, calming Wall Street and the global markets. Even Bob Brinker could help. Whatever he suggests, Pres Honeybee would propose the opposite.

Once I get the green light from Honey I'm off to Des Moines to start the groundwork, recruit volunteers and snag some sponsors for BulbTimer.

The stakes have never been greater. Time is of the essence. The future of this country hangs in the balance. (Insert your cliche here)

YES WE CAN

Honeybee said...

Patriot Birdbrain,

A special message bulletin was sent by the Starship's secret Varon-T Disruptor from the anonymous underground special forces, the BSN, AKA: the Brinker Spy Network.

This secret message bulletin was delivered to Klingon-Colorado, instructing them to intercept your post by any means necessary including particle-beams and anti-matter warheads.

But you will be glad to know that in spite of their best effort, your history-making, save the country, nominations got through this morning. :)

Anonymous said...

Frankj:

It is said that dogs can sense fear in humans. It is a lesser known fact that some dogs, not all, can sense insincerity and duplicity. The dog must have been listening to the show before the owner got through.

Honeybee said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
jeffchristie said...

Yesterday was not the first time Brinker was upstaged by a dog. This is from your
3 April 2011 summary.


BRINKER'S COMEDY ACT FOR THE DAY....Ed from Marin, California wanted to know a safe place to park $50,000 while he waited to buy a house. Brinker recommended fully insured CD's, then when he found out that Ed was going to wait ten years to buy his house, he changed his mind and told Ed that he might want to use a balanced portfolio -- even though it would be possible to lose money in the stock portion.

Brinker said: "You may not want to do this. You could lose money, (dog barks in background) See that? Fido agrees! Fido is listening to Moneytalk and he's right on the money!......Boy, I'll tell you, these canines that listen to the program, they are so incredibly sharp. I mean, they are right on it!"
......................

Brinker was hyper on that day. Here is what he said to Donna.

DOLLAR COST AVERAGE AND SIDEWAYS MOVES... Caller Donna from Des Moines (Brinker called her "Donna, the Prima Donna) wanted to know about dollar-cost-averaging.


http://honeysbobbrinkerbeehivebuzz2.blogspot.com/2011/04/april-3-2011-bob-brinkers-moneytalk.html

Honeybee said...

Jeffchristie....LOL! If you listened to the program, what was your take on why Bob Brinker got so excited over "Fido, the canine" simply barking in the background?

Here's the link you referred to from the archived blog on April 3rd.

Anonymous said...

I always thought pinkberry was some kind of STD.

jeffchristie said...

Honey

The Dog's bark was extremely loud. It was almost startling. I was thinking what is going on here. It looks like Bob Brinker has a standard response. I wonder how many times this happened over his 25 years of doing moneytalk.

Practical Progressive said...

Honey, many thanks for another excellent Moneytalk summation. Looking behind the curtain, our favorite markettimer wizard really is a befuddled old-timer who won't own up to his mistakes. A simple "I got it wrong two weeks ago" would have earned my respect. Instead, we got a song and a dance "Who let the dogs out?" and a load of misdirection.
BB isn't alone, of course. As you pointed out in an earlier blog, a Hulbert Financial Digest survey found only about 10 out of about 150 other financial newsletters issued a sell before the 08 crash and also called the bottom.
So, where does that leave us amateur investors with respect to market timing? Buy-and-hold with periodic rebalancing?

Dan G said...

"So, where does that leave us amateur investors with respect to market timing? Buy-and-hold with periodic rebalancing?"

That is certainly a workable solution in my opinion. If I didn't enjoy trying to outfox the market so much, that's the method I'd use. It has a built-in mechanism to "buy low, sell high".

Anonymous said...

Frankj:

I have come to the conclusion that when people call and begin by thanking Bob (whether subscribers or not) for helping them reach critical mass, they are NOT thanking him for his market timing per se.

They must be long time listeners who, years ago, took his general advice on the following and applied it:

* no load index funds.
* max out 401K, then Roth or reg IRA.
* limit exposure to individual stocks.
* GNMA's for a part of fixed income portfolio.
* once you reach critical mass, you don't do anything to jeopardize it.

Honeybee said...

FrankJ posted:

"They must be long time listeners who, years ago, took his general advice on the following and applied it:

* no load index funds.
* max out 401K, then Roth or reg IRA.
* limit exposure to individual stocks.
* GNMA's for a part of fixed income portfolio.
* once you reach critical mass, you don't do anything to jeopardize it."


FrankJ,

That's an excellent list of Bob Brinker's best advice. All I could add is:

* You can learn to be your own financial/investment manager and then you can avoid shark attacks.

Honeybee said...

Jeffchristie said: "I wonder how many times this happened over his 25 years of doing moneytalk."

I wonder too, and I also wonder what that line about the dog knowing what Brinker is going to say is all about.

Do you suppose that the reason he gets so excited about it is because it's a special, inside message to someone?

Anonymous said...

Kickoff of the 2012, presidential campaign. Cannon Falls, Minn.

“President Barack Obama launched a rare direct attack Monday on the GOP presidential field, criticizing Republican hopefuls for their blanket opposition to any compromise involving new taxes”.
“the candidates said they would refuse to support a deal with tax increases, even if tax revenues were outweighed 10-to-1 by spending cuts.” POTUS labeled this position as crazy.

My response to that is, that it is not crazy; it’s that we don’t trust you Mr. Pres.! Let’s see the spending cuts first, then we can talk about raising taxes.

The POTUS proposal is like a student saying, “I’ll get better grades if you raise my allowance”. No, not so fast, let’s see the A’s first, then we can talk about raising the allowance.

Please tell POTUS to stop growing the government ever bigger and bigger. Let’s start shrinking the “tumor” of government that is consuming this nation.


At Mid. blue Monday, Col.D Brewski

Practical Progressive said...

Re. buy-and-hold with periodic rebalancing, Dan G. said:
"That is certainly a workable solution in my opinion. If I didn't enjoy trying to outfox the market so much, that's the method I'd use. It has a built-in mechanism to 'buy low, sell high.'"
Dan, Honey, etc., without giving away any trade secrets, does anyone have an idea how to "outsmart" the market with any consistency? Don't almost all day traders lose money?
Ever since the infamous QQQ bulletin, I've done better following my own advice than listening to Mr. B. I'm underweighted in equities, but the ones I like best generate consistent dividends. Still, my Ginnies and iBonds seem to be outperforming stocks. The best idea I can come up at this time is to hold cash and cash equivalents, and maybe buy into the next big drop.

Dan G said...

Practical Progressive said, "...without giving away any trade secrets, does anyone have an idea how to "outsmart" the market with any consistency? Don't almost all day traders lose money?"

Real short answers:

Yes
&
Yes

Anonymous said...

5 money moves one quant trader is making now

Buy-and-hold is dead; cash is king, Ritholtz says

SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) — To a generation of investors raised to believe in the power of owning stocks for the long run, Barry Ritholtz has a characteristically blunt message: Buy-and-hold investing is dead.

The classic investing strategy that worked wonderfully through the 1980s and 1990s has been losing potency over the past decade, Ritholtz points out, but old beliefs die hard. Yet die they must — if an investor hopes to weather the current stormy market climate and even take advantage of it.

Ritholtz, an investment manager, is chief executive of FusionIQ, a quantitative research firm, and also runs a popular blog about markets and investing called The Big Picture. The way he sees it, stock investors need to bury the past — and quickly.

“The time for buy and hold is during a secular bull market, like from 1982 to 2000,” Ritholtz said. “When you’re in a secular bear market, which we are in, I think of investors’ jobs as managing risk and preserving capital.”


http://www.marketwatch.com/Story/Story/?guid={567A0A32-C46A-11E0-9192-00212803FAD6}

Anonymous said...

Practical Progressive said: “The best idea I can come up at this time is to hold cash and cash equivalents, and maybe buy into the next big drop.”

Practical Progressive laments the foibles of market timing, but finishes with, the above quoted proclamation. Is that not a prediction?

What if the market sky rockets to S&P 1800 and never looks back? Are you in, or do still have cash earning .04%? What if you do get that hoped for big drop, will you know it when you see it? If you.do go in at that time, will you fear a further drop? If you get your drop, go in, and then 10 years later find the market has gone sideways and languished, what will you do then?

Stock market predictions are not easy, if it were, even Bob Brinker could do it.

I have a suggestion. Stand by for my humble recommendation. Later.

Ciao for now, Col. D Brewski

Anonymous said...

After listening to his pitch for a free back issue of the market timer newsletter for the past 2 months, I decided to give it a try. Of course, it's from August 2010, when the S&P 500 was at 1101.60 and he was gloating over his "buy" recommendation in the low 1000's range and the 3 days where it closed between 1022 and 1028. 1022 was the closing low for calendar year 2010, as it turns out. That was the 7th buy recommendation in a row without a sell recommendation. It's shameless!

StoxNBondz

Practical Progressive said...

My question about how to time the market, if at all, has already elicited some cute and maybe snarky answers. Is this an initiation? Okay, you got me!
I started blogging at this site because we seem to share a deep disappointment in BB, especially his tendency to rewrite history. Well, I'm definitely over my BB hero worship and want to move on.
Since I was largely out of equities in 08 I dodged that bullet, but I also missed jumping back in at the low point. Because of large positions in iBonds and ginnies I've slightly beaten inflation over the years, but I need to do a bit better. I'm up over 2% YTD, annualized, really treading water.
I was thinking some of you may be able to give me some pointers, but maybe I'm barking up the wrong tree. "Who let the dogs out?" :)
At any rate, kudos again to Honey for great BB show summaries and historical corrections!

Honeybee said...

StoxNBonds wrote: "After listening to his pitch for a free back issue of the market timer newsletter for the past 2 months, I decided to give it a try. Of course, it's from August 2010, when the S&P 500 was at 1101.60 and he was gloating over his "buy" recommendation in the low 1000's range and the 3 days where it closed between 1022 and 1028. 1022 was the closing low for calendar year 2010, as it turns out. That was the 7th buy recommendation in a row without a sell recommendation. It's shameless!"
StoxNBondz



TRULY! Thank you for letting us know what month he is using for the freebie now. It's obvious why he chose that one.

You are very aware of his history before September 2010, so all it did was expose to you how he operates. It "ain't" a purty picture.

Imagine if you were a new listener to Moneytalk (or even an older one who hadn't subscribed before), and you received that issue. You would be mislead into believing that he not only made a good buying opportunity, but that his portfolios had profited from it.

And since they have stopped all Marketimer subscriptions to libraries, there is almost no way on Earth for anyone to find out about these ongoing deceptions.

And now you see why he continues to do Moneytalk on Sundays, in spite of being way past retirement age.

You said it best: It is shameless! And this latest "special bulletin" shark attack is contemptible. But I have no doubt the cash register in Littleton, Colorado is ringing like crazy!

Honeybee said...

Practical Progressive asked: "So, where does that leave us amateur investors with respect to market timing? Buy-and-hold with periodic rebalancing?"

I see that you have commented on some of the replies to your questions. Knowing DanG as I do, I don't think he was being snarky, I think he was being humorous.

I would advise you to look for his TA commentaries when they appear and consider them carefully. Dan comes closer to being able to call the future direction of the market than anyone I have ever known.

I can also give you my own personal opinion-answer to your question, but it's worth what you pay for it. :)

I think that buy-and-hold with occasional re-balancing makes good sense. But so much depends on how long you've got to "hold." If the money can remain invested for 5-10 years, it might be better than trying to time in and out of the market.

That way, you are at least guaranteed to keep up with the market -- provided you are buying the market.

I like to buy the market through ETFs such as VTI and SPY....However, right now, I don't own either of them. I'm mostly out of stock.

I find that I can make more money doing occasional trades, with much less risk.

I know this probably has not been much help, but in order to say much more, I would need to know more about you.

Anonymous said...

My question about how to time the market, if at all, has already elicited some cute and maybe snarky answers. Is this an initiation? Okay, you got me!

Okay I'll be serious. The overall best method is to use low cost funds, and asset allocation strategy and to rebalance. Be very picky about the rebalance period. You might want to research it a bit, but the last research I saw indicated longer was better in terms of 18 months vs 12 months and 12 months better than 6 months etc.

Although Bogle would debate the point, you probably want to give value a hedge over growth in a portfolio. So most generic financial planners using low cost funds in an asset allocation approach would recommend that for a given asset class, you divide it into two and make one 1/2 value.

For example if you select a 20% weighting in small caps you would have a 10% weighting in a broad range small cap index and 10% in a small cap value index.

Another approach which gets buried often but has merit is to buy individual stocks and hold them. it becomes incredibly tax efficient in the long haul. I truly like dividend stocks because they throw off something in a malaise economy (which we are trending toward), you just need to carefully watch the beta. It can limit your downside, but also cap the upward potential. One nice thing is you can make a bit of money selling options.

If you have the time and talent you really should look at real estate holdings. 6-8-10 unit flats are very attractive now and many have positive cash flows.

You also should take a strong look at tax lien certificates, especially if you have time on your hands.

And if you have over a million dollars, you are considered a sophisticated investor and a whole new world of investments opens up to you. If you know your Congressmen or Senator (State or Federal) they may cut you in on any one of a number of sleaze ball Section 8 housing deals most seem to hide money in. The returns are very stable and usually are in the 8-12% range but steady and pretty much guaranteed. The only thing that kept form getting gin on it was my conscience.

I hope that helps open up some possibilities for you.

tfb

Anonymous said...

Practical Progressive:

seekingalpha.com is a good resource.

-- Frankj

Anonymous said...

One more comment, in academic terms their is the concept of risk adjusted return.

In the near past Eric Kobren probably had the best risk adjusted return of the gurus out there. In that case he got market rate of return while assuming much less overall risk. The point here is to be aware of the factor risk plays. All returns are not equal. A 10% return on one stock is inferior on a risk adjusted basis to a 10% return on the S&P500.

There are several way to get superior risk adjusted returns, Bee hinted at one, buying when their is blood in the streets and then exiting and moving into cash equivalents. When interest rates are low, this is unexciting, but when interest rates are 4-7% it can be an exciting place to be.

tfb

Anonymous said...

"The point here is to be aware of the factor risk plays. All returns are not equal. A 10% return on one stock is inferior on a risk adjusted basis to a 10% return on the S&P500."

But a dollar of profit is ALWAYS equal to a dollar. You can't spend "risk adjusted returns".

And buy and hold works only in long term bull markets not secular bear markets as we are now in.

It didn't matter how often you rebalanced during the past decade or so...your returns were zero or close to it.

Dan G said...

The chances for a "follow through" day are becoming more and more diminished, it seems to me.

1) The rally yesterday had enough price movement, but lacked volume, and hence institutional commitment.

2) In only 3 days of rally, the slow stochastic went from very oversold to overbought, where it is now.

I am now devoid of stocks and went mildly short via SDS.

Note too that the long term index, which on Aug 1 was within a gnat's eye of turning negative, is almost surely to turn negative on September 1st, indicating to me that a long slide is very probable.

And September has historically been one of the worst months for stocks.

So while not outright bearish yet, I am in the "chicken" camp.

Tom T said...

Spotted on a road near Vegas:

Just send your
$185 in
And help me
keep that
watermellon grin

~Brinker Shave

Anonymous said...

You get a "haircut" with that subscription, too!

Frankj

Honeybee said...

Here are a couple of SeaBiscuit's classic Brinker-Shaves that he wrote in the fall of 2008 during the worst of the megabear market. :)

Brinker-Shaves, written by SeaBiscuit:

Buy it at 1200/1100/900...

Never mind the knuckles turning white

Cuz one of these days/months/years...

He's eventually gonna be "right"!

Brinker Shave

*******************

The next buy level is no secret

Now that Brinker has blundered

It will be a few dozen points lower

At the next lower hundred

Brinker Shave!

Honeybee said...

DanG said: "So while not outright bearish yet, I am in the "chicken" camp."

Dan,

Have you ever heard of Louise Yamada? She agrees with you, but is even more bearish. She claims the market is now in a "cyclical bear."

I'd be interested in your take on this video and what she has to say:

Market in Death Cross Mode: Stay on the Sidelines Says Louise Yamada

U.S. Markets as a Whole: Louise says we are "finished with a cyclical bull and entering a cyclical bear." It's not the end of the world, just an end of the uptrend off the 2009 lows. Since January of this year, the market has seen falling volume on rallies. Simply put, longs are nervous and ever less inclined to buy the dips. As we saw when the S&P500 uptrend from 2009 broke definitively around the 1,300 level, followed by support failing at 1,250; nervous bulls sell in a hurry.

The Death Cross & Other Momentum "Tells": A Death Cross occurs when the 50-day moving average (MA) falls beneath the longer term, 200-day MA. This technical indicator is getting a lot of buzz of late, both because it has a very cool name and it's been a relatively reliable indicator of a failing market. The fact of the averages crossing is a function of market momentum failing. Obviously. The Death Cross occurs relatively seldom and can change quickly, Louise notes. A false cross occurred in 2010 but reversed within weeks. On the other hand, the cross in early 2008 was an outstanding exit cue. These are the two most recent Death Cross triggers.

While "one should pay attention" to the Death Cross, Louise is more concerned with the MACD, Stochastic, and ADX. These more subtle indicators of market momentum are all looking punk, adding to Louise's conviction that the cyclical bull is done. As is the case with all momentum-based technicals, Louise's favorite 3 tells don't tic the exact top, but rather suggest a pull-back will be more sustained than the normal ebb and flow of the tape.

Uptrends and Support: These blunt instruments of TA are the basis of the Purple Crayon system. They are the indicators most widely followed by the masses, meaning the maximum number of buyers create demand when uptrends and support are hit. In a bull market, the thick crayon lines hold, just as they did from the S&P bottom of '09 all the way to this summer. When "uptrends (are) sliced right through leading to 20% down moves" it's rather obvious the buyers have less conviction than fleeing bears.

Add it up and markets are showing ominous weakness, both on the macro economic front and the charts. To be clear, Louise isn't crying "short!", she's suggesting a position on the sidelines. "There are only two losses that you take," she sagely observes, "Loss of capital and loss of opportunity. I'd rather be out of the market wishing we were in, than in the market wishing we were out."

Honeybee said...

Tom T.....Thank you so much for the Brinker-Shave. I posted a few minutes ago asking if you were SeaBiscuit from Silicon Investor. Then I did a search of the archived Beehive and found that you are not.

(I guess you are the official Brinker-Shave author now because SeaBiscuit has not posted on Silicon Investor for some time. I do hope he is okay.)

I found these great Brinker-Shaves that you posted in August 2008:
Tom T said...

I loved the Brinker-Shaves by Seabiscuit. As one who has had his portfolio "shaved" by following the Marketimer, may I offer the following?
*******************
Save your 185

The Cassandras yell,

Why only buy

And never Sell?

~Brinker-Shave
***************************


Theres bears ahead,

Remember Sonny

That Marketimer

Didn't save the bunny.

~Brinker-Shave
**************************

The Marketimer

Will let you down

Quicker than

A Strapless Gown.

~Brinker-Shave
*************************

Many a fortune

Used to stand

Where the Marketimer

Got out of hand.

~Brinker-Shave
*******************************


In this valley

Of toil and sin,

Your portfolio grows bald,

But not your chin.

~Brinker-Shave


Honeybee, thanks for this site -- and my apologies to Burma-Shave.

Tom T.
August 20, 2008 12:14 PM

Honeybee said...

Here is one by Jody from the heart of the megabear:

Jody said...

I love SeaBiscuit's Burma Shave idea, so here's my two cents:

He timed well in 2000 and 2003

Was it just luck, or real wizardry?

I stuck with the program, but now it’s certain,

His model doesn’t work, and my IRA’s hurtin’

Brinker Shave

Honeybee said...

anonymous said: "But a dollar of profit is ALWAYS equal to a dollar. You can't spend "risk adjusted returns".

And buy and hold works only in long term bull markets not secular bear markets as we are now in.

It didn't matter how often you rebalanced during the past decade or so...your returns were zero or close to it."


anonymous, I have no clue who you are, but you sure made some good points. Thank you.

I refrained from going into this with Practical Progressive, so I'm glad you did.

That explains why Bob Brinker's Model Portfolios I and II are BOTH worth LESS than they were October 31, 2008 when the market topped and he was screaming, buy, buy, buy.

Honeybee said...

Bob Brinker's latest mutual fund recommendation is DoubleLine Total Return (DLTNX). He added a 20% weighting to his off-the-books "income fund" in May, 2011 (sold some of his Vanguard Ginnie Mae Fund holding).

On Moneytalk and in Marketimer, Brinker sung the praises of the fund manager, Jeffrey Gundlach. Gundlach was in court today:

LOS ANGELES | Tue Aug 16, 2011 1:11pm EDT

Aug 16 (Reuters) - Jeffrey Gundlach thought it was "quite likely" that DoubleLine Capital, the firm he launched after being fired by his former employer, was going to fail six months after its formation, he said in court.

"We were losing tons of money" in June 2010, he told jurors on Tuesday. "It was quite likely the business would fail."

But in the following months, the firm attracted more clients and launched more funds and by the end of the year closed out with $6 billion in assets under management and $10 million in revenue, he added.

Gundlach and his former employer, Trust Company of the West, are locked in a trial that has given a rare glimpse into the inner workings of investment firms and the big personalities who run them.

TCW fired Gundlach in December 2009 and sued him a month later, accusing him of stealing trade secrets, plotting to form a new company using TCW proprietary information and gutting the firm of its entire mortgage-backed securities team.

Gundlach fired back with a counter-lawsuit, alleging his former employer owed him hundreds of millions of dollars in compensation.

In the weeks following his termination, Gundlach went on to form DoubleLine, along with three of his co-defendants in the case. Roughly 45 TCW employees, largely from the mortgage-backed securities group, followed.

Gundlach, who calls himself "The Pope" and "The Godfather," returned to the stand on Tuesday for his third day of testimony. He told jurors he repeatedly instructed DoubleLine employees not to use TCW data and to turn in devices that contained such data.

TCW is a unit of French bank Societe Generale (SOGN.PA).

The case in Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles is Trust Co of the West v. Jeffrey Gundlach et al, BC429385. (Reporting by Mary Slosson; editing by Andre Grenon)

Reuters:Investor Gundlach feared his new firm would fail

Dan G said...

HoneyBee, I had never heard of Louise Yamada, but I agree with much of what she says.

I never thought that we are in a "stuctural" bear market since we did exceed the 2000 high in S&P slightly in 2007. But that's neither here nor there. If we're in a cyclical bear market, we're in big trouble in any case.

I'm almost convince that we are in a bear. My favorite long term indicator, monthly MACD, was so close to a crossover on Aug. 1 that unless a huge rally happens almost immediately (unlikely), we will crossover into a long term sell signal on September 1.

That, for me, would be the final nail in the coffin. As it happens, September is historically a lousy month for the stock market, so that even increases the odds of a bear market.

But...it usually pays to wait for confirmation before taking large short positions. So while I have a modest short via SDS now, I will see how the market acts over the next couple of weeks before plunging in whole hog...or whole bear!

Honeybee said...

I bought a few hundred shares of NGD today -- probably a long-term hold.
.

Anonymous said...

I had never heard of Louise Yamada

---
She is one of the best and highest paid TA person in history.

Joey

Anonymous said...

HB, noticed that NGD was mentioned prominently recently on some boards over at SI..Hope that wasn't the determining factor :).. Some of the posters there seem to be on a different planet sometimes.

Pig said...

Some of the posters there seem to be on a different planet sometimes.

I got some of my best tips from Martians, and made the most money on a hot tip from a Bugeye from Alpha Centauri.

Don't be such a racist and homophobe.

Honeybee said...

Do you know anything about NGD or did you just want to comment about Ground Zeros' trading thread at Silicon Investor?

Honeybee said...

FYI from Charles Schwab.com:

"The Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ) has an operating expense ratio that is the lowest among ETFs in its category—lower than the Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) and iShares Barclays Aggregate Bond Fund (AGG).

This new Schwab ETF offers:

An operating expense ratio of only 0.10%

Access to the broad U.S. taxable bond market

A fixed-income allocation option for your portfolio"

Honeybee said...

Joey said: (Louise Yamada) "She is one of the best and highest paid TA person in history."

Thanks Joey....She sure seemed to be very well grounded and knowledgeable.

Probably too pricey for me. She doesn't even offer any free issues of her newsletter. Just a phone number. :)

Anonymous said...

I got some of my best tips from Martians, and made the most money on a hot tip from a Bugeye from Alpha Centauri.

Don't be such a racist and homophobe.


Ummm.. I rest my case LOL!!!

Anonymous said...

Do you know anything about NGD or did you just want to comment about Ground Zeros' trading thread at Silicon Investor?

I know the basics about this mining stock ---
Also, you are the first to mention a particular SI message subject by name. I didn't mention any names....
But observing that particular board subject, it makes Brinker look like a f-ing genius.. LOL!!!

Honeybee said...

Did I make any comparisons to Bob Brinker?

If I was going to make comparisons, the first thing I would say is that Bob Brinker SELLS his advice to unsuspecting "goobers and geezers." (thanks to my old and greatly missed friend Will for those amusing words.)

And the next thing I would say is that Bob Brinker hides his entire litany of terrible market-timing blunders.

GZ neither sells anything on that thread nor hides a darn thing. Just the opposite, he keeps a running list of his trades.

What are the chances that Bob Brinker will ever make an itemized list of all his blunders.

Hmmmmmmmm, now there is an idea there somewhere....

PS: I think you're jealous...now isn't that interesting?

Anonymous said...

"GZ neither sells anything ON THAT THREAD nor hides a darn thing. Just the opposite, he keeps a running list of his trades."

He has so many trades it's impossible to keep track of what he says he does. Often posts trades well after the fact, if at all.

He says he has a model he follows blindly doesn't even think about it. He just does what it says.

Do you believe such a model really exists or is it smoke like Brinker's model?

Dan G said...

Armageddon has arrived! The low volume rally and the failure to "follow through" was a big clue not to get sucked into this market. At least not on the long side.

My only regret is that I only have a modest short position, via SDS. But it's performing like gangbusters today.

Now--what's Bob going to say about this? Another DCA opportunity? Or, "Sorry folks, I really meant to say sell everything and go short!"

Or will he take to the links again this Sunday and hope no one remembers his bad advice?

The chances of my favorite long-term indicator staying bullish when it is re-calculated at the end of this horrible month are slim and none IMHO. And long-term sell signals are not usually reversed easily.

So now I will watch for awhile to see if there is any opportunity to add to short positions. Any small rally will do.

jeffchristie said...

Anonymous said...
HB, noticed that NGD was mentioned prominently recently on some boards over at SI..Hope that wasn't the determining factor :).. Some of the posters there seem to be on a different planet sometimes.

Yes many of us here feel you are on a different planet. Our planet is named Earth. What is your planet called.

Honeybee said...

Dan,

Thanks...Again, you have been right on the money. So SDS is your favorite shorting vehicle?

For those who want leverage, it looks like TZA, the 3X bear small cap, or SQQQ are the ones to own this morning.

Dan G said...

Yes, HB, SDS is the "short" I usually use. It's based on S&P, a major index, and is quite broadly traded. And 2X leverage is enough of a "gamble" for me. My motto is to be bold but not reckless!

I was able to add a smidgeon of SDS this morning. SDS is currently up about 8 1/2%. Not bad for less than 2 hour's work! Of course the day is not over yet, so vigilance is key. Martini time can wait until after the market closes...either to celebrate, or to mourn!

Pig said...

anon, still on a crying jag about friends of Ms Honey, whimpers: "Do you believe such a model really exists or is it smoke like Brinker's model?"

Why would you even care what Ms Honey believes about a model or site that disgusts you, but that you obviously read each and every day?

Are you some kind of stalking sicko, on a jealous rampage?

I think you are dangerous and should be reported to the FBI or to the gay Boyz at Langley.

.... and now you are taking whacks at Brinker too? Back to playing both sides again, I see.

Whatta freak........

Pig said...

Dan said I was able to add a smidgeon of SDS this morning.

I tried to buy some SPXU, and it shot past my limit like an Atlas rocket.

I decided NOT to chase it. With hindsight, I should have.

So far my hindsight picks are doing 100%.

birdbrain said...

Mr B believes a 13.5% decline for the S&P from its yearly closing high is a "correction teenager." Using my sometimes fuzzy math:

At S&P 1119 (down 18%) this teen will be eligible to vote.

At 1078 (down 21%) the strapping lad will have grown to a bear market and able to purchase alcohol. Which would come in handy for those following the Brinker portfolios.

Dan G said...

Wow! What a day! I took profits near the close. And just in time, it seems. Lots of short covering in the last 10 minutes. Good to be in cash again. I'm exhaused!

Jim said...

I missed the great "shorting" chance today. I had other things going on and could not watch what the market was doing. Looks like I may get another chance tomorrow. I usually short with TZA. Actually I use it as a hedge to protect my longs. We'll soon find out if the old lows hold. If not, Brinker has some explaining to do.

Honeybee said...

Jim,

I sure hope they hold, but right now the futures are down. Of course, that can change.

Honeybee said...

Good for you, Dan! I guess you just want to play it safe by selling your shorts. Seems wise. This market is wild!



PS: To Jim,

Thanks for the TZA suggestion. I'll check it out.

Dan G said...

If the futures numbers hold up (or rather down)until tomorrow's opening, I will probably kick myself for taking profits in "short" SDS about 10 minutes before today's close.

Oh well, was it Bernard Baruch that said he made his money by selling too soon? Or was in John Maynard Keynes? In any case, it looks like that's what I did.

And it looks now like there won't be a chance to re-enter a short position on a dead-cat bounce. Life is not fair!

Honeybee said...

Birdbrain,

Interesting numbers for us to watch. Right now the S&P is setting at 1140.65.

We hit 1120 on August 10th, so that must be the low that Jim said needs to hold.

So that "young sprout" correction has been voting age once before and got snatched from the jaws of disaster.

Will history repeat itself. I'm sure you all remember when this happened in 2008 and Brinker wouldn't admit that it was a bear even when it was down 19%. Then he couldn't sell into weakness. Too funny....

But this time, he's filling the family coffers with the promise of a new "buy signal." No one could make this stuff up. LOL!

Honeybee said...

Mr Pig said: "So far my hindsight picks are doing 100%."

Yep, my hindsight crystal ball is perfect too. :)

SPXU went up almost 13% today. Wow! One or two days like that is all most of us need. LOL!

Honeybee said...

Dan,

When I do things like that, like I recently did with NLY, I always tell myself that peace of mind is worth a lot of money.

You'll sleep better tonight knowing that you at least won't give all you profits back by 6:35am. :)

Dan G said...

"You'll sleep better tonight knowing that you at least won't give all you profits back by 6:35am. :)"

I know, I know! You're right. But doggone it, just once I'd love to cover shorts at the exact bottom! Some people are able to do that consistently. They are called "liars"! :-)