STOCKS...At least twice today, Brinker commented that the stock market dropped 1150 points Thursday and Friday because of the proposed tariffs.
Honey EC: Brinker gave no indication that he was unduly concerned about the stock market being back in correction territory again. He is still fully invested, and as of Sunday evening, has not issued any kind of special bulletin.
TARIFFS, RONALD REAGAN....dRahme Audio Clip: Pie in the Face; Tariffs
MARKETIMER MODEL PORTFOLIO III (BALANCED).....Caller Steve, who is a new subscriber asked about bond duration in the Portfolio III.
Brinker replied: "For the uninitiated, Steve - I want everyone to be on the same page - you are referring to page 8 of the Marketimer investment letter where we publish three of our model portfolios. You are referring to the model portfolio III, which we define as a balanced portfolio which invests in the stock market and also invests in fixed income securities."
BRINKER RECOMMENDS VANGUARD PRIME MONEY MARKET FUND (VMMXX).....Caller Steve asked if Brinker would recommend a Vanguard Fund with a duration of 2 to 3 years.
Brinker replied: "I recommend you stay away from the extended duration. (Here are) a couple of things you could do. They have a really attractive Prime Money Market Fund at Vanguard.....That fund has a current yield of 1.58. That's a really attractive yield for a fund that has essentially zero duration.....You could also look at a ladder of fully FDIC-insured Certificates of Deposit.....I would use a three, six, nine, twelve month horizon on the ladder, and roll it as the CDs come due.....I cannot extend my duration recommendation based the outlook on the interest rate market as we see it."
Honey EC: It was nice of Brinker to tell the audience about the Vanguard Prime Money Market Fund that he added (20%) to his model portfolio III (balanced) in exchange for (20%) MetroWest Unconstrained Bond Fund. In the off-the-record income portfolio, he exchanged 35% of the MetroWest Unconstrained Bond Fund for 35% of the Vanguard Prime Money Market Fund. Those exchanges were made as of February 12, 2018.
VANGUARD GINNIE MAE FUND (VFIIX)....Caller Mike from Seattle said he has owned GNMAs and reminded Brinker that years ago, he used to talk about them every week.
(Honey EC: That is certainly true. Brinker used to brag almost every week about owning them, and he always pointed out that they could "fluctuate in NAV price" but those who own them for income shouldn't worry about price fluctuation - to expect them to bounce between $9.50 and $10.50.)
BRINKER ON GINNIE MAES.... Brinker said to Mike from Seattle: "We sold out of our Ginnie Maes back in the day. Ginnie Maes are not doing well. Even the fund that I think that is probably the most correctly situated in terms of its expense ratio and management - the Vanguard GNMA Fund - is not doing well. The Fund has a current yield of 2 7/8% but a duration of 4.8 years. That duration is hurting the share price. The share price has been in decline and this year has a total return of negative 1.5%."
Honey EC: Brinker didn't lie about selling the GNMAs, but he did not tell the truth. It's doubtful that he will ever tell the truth about when he sold them. He said "back in the day," Actually, it was five years ago, and in the interim, the Vanguard Ginnie Mae Fund has done very well for those who held it. He sold VFIIIX July 8, 2012 at $10.37....It has been as high as $11.20 over the past five years, and never below $10.00. Is now a good time to sell it at $10.24? Probably.....
Honey EC: Brinker's deep dive into low-duration, which was years too early, cost his portfolios "hugely" in performance, so in January 2015, Brinker sold both portfolio holdings in FFRHX and replaced them with Doubleline Total Return Bond Fund (DLTNX). As the years went on, Brinker continued to make changes to his bond fund holdings - adding more high yield bond risk. As of now Marketimer porfolios have only three fixed income holdings: DLSNX; OSTIX and VMMXX
RATE HIKES THIS WEEK AND IN THE FUTURE....dRahme Audio Clip: The FOMC; Jobs - Need Trained Workers, Education
INFLATION....Brinker discussed with the guest that there was almost no visible inflation, but the Fed raised rates this week.
THE WEEK AHEAD IN THE CANYONS OF WALL STREET.... dRahme Audio Clip: The Week Ahead
FRANKJ'S MONEYTALK GUEST SUMMARY
Brinker's guest-author was Edward Yardeni:
Bob plugged the third hour
interview at least three times during the first two hours of the show. Coy as always, he did not reveal who the
guest was until the start of the interview.
It was a Wall Street veteran, Edward Yardeni, President of Yardeni
Research. The occasion was the release
of a book: “Predicting the Markets.”
As to why he wrote the book
the guest said it was in response to “a 40 year itch.” He elaborated a bit that it was partly
autobiographical. Sounds interesting. Dr. Yardeni is known for “the Fed
model.” You can read about it in
various places on the web. It is not
clear whether he developed it, or simply named it. From Investopedia: “This model suggests that returns on 10-year
Treasury notes should be similar to the S&P 500 earnings yield. Differences
in these returns identify an overpriced or underpriced securities market.”
Not surprisingly, Bob led
off with a question about the recent tariffs initiated by the Trump
administration. The guest was a welcome
contrast to the one of a few weeks ago who went ballistic over the tariff
question. Dr. Yardeni said most
economists would agree that globalization was good and free trade is a worthy
goal. But, there has been unfair trade
and the administration has now come down hard on China. A recent report, 215 pages in length, lists
the unfair practices. He said President
Trump may save globalization from itself by taking some of the angst and
anxiety out of the topic. I interpret
this to mean that the tariffs and adjustments made behind the scenes won’t mean
the end of globalization, they’ll nudge things in a more fair direction for the
US.
Some bullet quotes:
·
Countries
exempted from the steel and aluminum tariffs did so because they caved.
·
President Trump
is “showing us the art of the deal” by making bold public statements, etc.,
while negotiations proceed.
·
The guest
“would not be surprised if Pres. Trump gets what he wants.”
·
“He wants to
get away from multi-lateral negotiations which take too long, and get to
bi-lateral (country to country)
negotiations.”
·
He complimented
President Trump for “checking off the things he said he’d do while
campaigning.” These included doing
something about trade and getting tax reform passed.
As to Jerome Powell, the
new Fed head: Dr. Yardeni likes
him. He’s a lawyer by training, not an
economist. He sees him as
pragmatic. Money talk regulars expected
Bob to ask what’s happening with the 10 year Treasury rates which are at
2.875%. The guest said part of the
reason they continue at this low amount has to do with Europe holding rates
down. He does not think equity
investors will run for the exits if the 10 year hits 3 to 3.5%. Indeed,
if it does it is a signal that the economy is doing well.
After the break Bob let
some callers in. First up was Rob from
KKOB in Albuquerque, NM who asked if we’re headed for an inverted yield
curve. (As a certain popular radio personality would say: “for those of you in Rio Linda that means are
we headed into a recession?”) The
guest’s short answer: no, he does not
see this developing. Bob and the guest
gnawed on this a bit and the guest said that 2% inflation justifies a 2 – 2.5%
fed funds rate which justifies a 3 – 3.5% 10 year Treasury.
The Fed believes that
monetary policy drives inflation. Too
much money and you get inflation so the antidote is to tighten by raising
interest rates. The guest said that
hasn’t been the case for the last 8 years – that is, loose purse strings
haven’t triggered inflation. He said our
population is aging and older societies are not as inflation prone. (Less consumption.)
Jim from IL, who we believe
is a repeat caller, but a good one, asked a question that stumped the guest. When he visited China he found regular stuff
like toothpaste to cost about the same as in the US. When he went to buy shoes, he found they were
a lot more expensive. In contrast, he
has had Chinese friends come here who want to hit the mall, buy a suitcase and start filling it with
stuff that is more expensive back home. What’s
the deal? As noted the guest didn’t have
a solid answer but speculated that the less expensive but still good quality
products get exported to the US and this is what Jim’s Chinese friends might be
after.
Tom, listening on KKOH in
Reno started off by complimenting Bob for the best guest so far this year. I don’t
know what his question was, I was distracted by 3 deer wandering through the
front yard. The guest said it was
unusual to cut taxes in a good performing economy, thus risking overheating the
economy. He mentioned Larry Kudlow,
recently named as top economic advisor to President Trump. He said they know each other and expressed
some admiration for Mr. Kudlow.
Dr. Yardeni is a fiscal
conservative. He would like to see more
restraint, not the kind of thing we witnessed this past week with the passage
of a 2200 page spending bill filled with all kinds of stuff. We’ve been getting away with deficit spending
and increasing debt for a long time now without the higher interest we’ll have
to pay on the debt if inflation kicks up.
If it does, we’ll be in trouble.
On the market, he thinks it
will go higher after we get through these tariff issues.
The take away: don’t let politics get in the way of making
money with your investments. Stick to the
facts. Be long term. You can make money in bonds …. If you bought
them at the right price, otherwise you’re going to suffer.
In signing off, Bob echoed
Dr. Yardeni’s comments saying for 32 years on the program he’s said not to let
politics get in the way of investing.
Listen Live: 710Knus
86 comments:
A new radio show indeed this week but Bob's comments regarding trade remains the same. Maybe the old (current) government policy of allowing other countries to continue imposing unfair trade policies should remain intact. What does it matter if the trade unbalances continue going forward.
Assuming Bob deigns to show up and grace us with his ebullient presence and a new show today, I doubt that he will spend much (if any) time on tariffs, the budget, or anything of a topical nature.
Why you ask?
Well, he rarely talks about the market these days, right? So, I think we must assume that he now focuses on general investing topics (and millionaire "plants") so that any/all new shows can be repurposed and rerun at a future time with minimal editing.
I think it is fair to say that (in essence) Bob has retired.
JC
PS: Of course, I "could" be wrong.
.
You are not wrong, JC. The whole monologue about the evils of tariffs.
.
Right John W....After all, China only screws the US out of $375 billion every year. What's a buck or two to keep the Commies happy.
Well, I was wrong. I thought he would attack the budget deal but he did end up attacking the tariffs. If he thinks tariffs always turn out badly and are driving down the market why doesn't he just put a sell on the market? Anyone remember if he was this upset at George W. Bush when he did the same thing in 2002?
Honeybee
With all due respect , JC in his just prior prognosticating comments is completely wrong as compared to what Bob is actually saying today.
.
Okay, I can hear radios clicking off all over the land.
It's politics as usual on Moneytalk - on steroids today.
I'll take the punishment for you all and keep listening and report to you.
.
Drs....LOL! You are correct. I didn't read JC's post correctly. :)
Agree with JC's assessment of calls / callers.
JC stated what I have been thinking about for a while .... i.e. BB wants generic calls on generic topics without specific dates or events referenced so he & Junior can "...cut & paste..." for future "Editions" so they can spend time at their mega mansion on 10th Street in Del Mar, CA. After all, it's only steps to the beach.
Oops ..... I also heard a few more "radio clicks"
DRS: Thank you, I thought I was losing my mind! That's okay Honey, we all love ya still.
Surprise: Budget deal, he actually (rightly) trashed Congress instead of the Prez.
Yes...yes...yes...OK...
However, I did say:
PS: Of course, I "could" be wrong.
Hence, I wasn't "completely wrong"...only 95% or so wrong.
JC
I'm tilting my PC camera up toward the ceiling and placing black tape on the lens. I think it's been compromised by a "Peeking Bob".
JC
Honeybee, Do you promise to sit thru the Super Beta P3 Advanced ads and the gold promos too? You must really be a glutton for punishment!
.
Here's my excuse and I'm sticking to it:
Those first 15 minutes of the show, I'm doing multi-tasking. :)
Right, Bluce. I appreciated Brinker's answer to Val in CA. about Congress being in charge of the budget.
Congress hasnt made a hard choice in 70 years. Why choose when you can have it all. Can't please everyone? Wanna bet?
Holy shit! Bob's guest is praising the President.
That had to be painful for Brinker to hear Yardeni say that Trump's policy with China may actually work.
Honeybee - Thanks for taking one for the team!
What ever Trump makes work congress is shure to somehow screw it up. They have lots of experience destroying brilliant ideas.
Could it be that Brinker knew Yardeni's pro-Trump position and did it as a way to offset the negative effects of his anti-Trump guest a couple weeks ago (don't remember his name and don't want to).
I'm curious to see if Brinker puts out a buy recommendation since this week's show is now over and after Yerdeni's positive market outlook. I thought there was a good post last week from someone pointing out that if Brinker was so negative about what was going on with Trump, tariff's and spending....why didn't he issue a "sell" signal. pretty telling IMHO.
Thanks Honey
Wasn't Brinker highly critical of Yardini in the 1990s?
.
I don't know, J.Wales.
What do you remember?
KC: Interesting point about Bobby's guest today.
I thought Yardini was one of Brinkers perma bears. He had pet names for certain people. The Geogia Peach bear & a few others.
Looks like stocks will go up tomorrow. Like someone here said they would. Seems eady to predict using volume & such. Why pay someone to tell you to buy or sell when your fully invested? I guess if you were just getting started investing maybe it would help.
HB: I'm sure Brinker said the Vanguard Prime Money Market is yielding 1 and 5/8% (=1.63%) (not 1.58%). Not an important difference but I thought I would mention for the sake of accuracy.
Yardeni's blog can be found here:
http://blog.yardeni.com/
Doesn't sound like a perma-bear. Some excerpts from Yardeni's March 21 blog:
"The Tax Cut and Jobs Act’s (TCJA) cut in the corporate statutory tax rate at the end of 2017 will send earnings hurtling beyond the Earth’s gravitational pull this year into outer space."
"...the meltdown in the stock market in early February was a flash-crash correction that would be short-lived given the meltup in actual and expected earnings."
J Wales: Stocks are easy to predict?
Do you know anybody who can do it consistently, and will beat a buy and hold broad index over the long term?
My apologies to all for the late posting of the 3rd hour summary. I wrote it and had it ready to send then got distracted. Just sent it to HB at 8:10 pm west coast time.
.
Frankj.....All's well that ends well. No worries. Your great summary is there now - thanks.
.
Note to all: Today's guest author was great, as you can see by reading Frankj's Summary.
Also, dRahme made an audio clip for us - and I want to thank him, since I wanted to hear the interview again:
Yardeni Interview
Finally a non-futurist communist as a guest. He was good.
Bill B asks ..........
Honeybee, if BB issues a special bulletin (all in buy recommendation) in early/mid week would you insert/add it to your current show report to give us a heads up before your next show report comes due ? Thanks.
frankj: No problem Frank, thanks!
Thanks to you too, Honey.
The 3rd hour guest gave some market movement thoughts. Can anyone find a track record of his market calls.
Terry Stembridge said...
Finally a non-futurist communist as a guest. He was good.
Yes, I agree Terry. A complete 180 from the looney tunes, Trump hating, liberal "professor" from a couple Sundays ago.
Stocks go up on trade tension ease? Thats fake news.
.
Nice bounce back today. Hope we get more:
The Dow recorded its biggest point gain since 2008 on Monday, as reports of trade talks between the U.S. and China reduced fears of a possible trade war.
More on this story: https://www.foxbusiness.com/markets/dow-posts-biggest-one-day-point-gain-since-2008
I took a stroll through an Ikea yesterday. Yes there are products sold there that were produced in China. But I also saw products produced in India, Pakistan, Vietnam and Mexico.
We don't need China; leastways not to the degree many people think we do. There are literally scores of other countries we can partner with for cheap goods. And we need to begin diversifying to our advantage. After all, isn't that what financial talking heads like Brinker are always pounding on their pulpits about; minimizing risk and maximizing returns through diversity?
If China wants a trade war fine. It will force us to be strong as we should be. And it will be a lot less costly in the long run than a real war which is what will happen if we keep letting them rip off our technology and other intellectual properties and dictate to us and other countries where we can and can't sail in international waters.
We are nations with two different political views that are irreconcilable. Xi is a Maoist who grew up feeding on the Red Book and lives it. He is NOT our buddy!
Sorry, forgot to sign that last comment:
MK
Yep. Behind the scenes talks with China gave us this super rally.
Thank you for the update.
So did Bob miss the buy signal last Friday, or is there more downside to come? Just curious what the bloggers think his mindset is.
Yardeni made some good points but IMO so did Brinker in his opening Monologue today.
From Yardeni he reinforced the concept of not making investment decisions based on your political views. Paraphrasing here: better to Judge policy impacts based on whether you think they are bullish or bearish. Using your Good ol common sense noodle works.
Bob I think is closer to the mark on the outcome of tariffs. We have tried this before and it does not work despite what Yardeni said about Mnuchin's comments. I did not hear Mnuchin re: concessions from SoKO, Canada or wherever else. Define insanity. Nobody on the world stage is dumb enough to fall for a bluff especially when they own a hefty portion of US treasuries. So there is no bargaining chip advantage there. The low cost quality producer is hard to compete against. But then again good ol' American ingenuity is hard to beat. Tariffs do not work.
The market exploded up today on easing of trade war tensions.
I think I have cracked the code on GDP and it relates to this trade issue. GDP growth occurs based on population growth and productivity. If this is true then I believe the population growth is essence is US exporting to foreign high number population countries. With that said if we do wind up with MO Larry and Curly trade wars then we cut off or curtail this opportunity for GDP growth.
Watch the YOY GDP numbers they will lead you to the correct answer.
smile
testing testing 123... gotta probe that 200 DMA to make sure market is not on quicksand.
my guess is with a little more negative news we break the 200 DMA and try to retest that 3/9/18 intraday low @ 2532.69
volume today on S&P about 2.49B not as great as fri 3/23 but a little more than yesterday's up mkt day.
smile
.
Well Smile, no offense to that little Socialist (for all except himself) Zuckerberg, but Facebook started this whole tech slide and is bringing down the S&P along with it.
Vanguard may be losing it's gold star reputation.
from Vanguard today
"Your money market settlement balance may be displaying inaccurately"
Every since the separation (split) of Vang and Vang Brokerage there have been glitches,IMO.
HB, Yup and the hits keep coming as it spreads to Twitter on the privacy issue as if no one using those platforms knew their info. was being shared and that abuses would occur. AI related (Tesla NVDIA etc.) takes a hit on the crashes of self driving cars (gee who knew that software designed by humans would be flawed).
3rd revision on 4th Q GDP will be out tomorrow.
I think it and what is happening for 1st Q 2018 GDP will help build the case for Powell to take a rest on raising rates. It's that interplay with trade that will reduce US. GDP IMO. In a growing world as long as we get a slice we grow, when you impede that well the hit is to GDP.
Trade wars are no good for anyone. Bush learned this lesson for sure in 2003 and I presume Obama learned this lesson too in 2012.
smile
p.s I used the wrong date on my prior post - intraday low should have been 2/9/18 not 3/9
sn: yeah. An acquaintance got a message that there was not enough in their account to complete a transaction. The $$ was supposed to come out of the settlement account. A correction message came out 9 hours later, in effect, "never mind, hope it didn't cause you any ... "
Info war drug war cold war civil war cyber war global war nuclear war conventional war race war & on & on. Whats another war between friends? Trade is just another attempt to get one up. I'm a child of the 60s. Wars come & go. Delete this if you want Honey. Just rambling
smile,
Software designed by humans would be flawed. ?? And humans are not ?? I see the results of car crashes initiated every single day by 'flaw-less' human drivers....No software necessary.
Major Tom: I read smile's comment, in my own words, as: "Humans are flawed, therefore human-designed software will be flawed."
So whats the verdict Smile? Will we have a retest of the retest? Or will we hit new lows?
Vanguard also has some problems with its 403b split for new management. On a side note I miss Gabe, I hope he and his horses are kicken ass.
.
Ruyfa...I have requested that comments to or about Gabe not be written here, but you mixed yours in with what I thought was an important investment comment.
Please no more Gabe. It was 100% his decision to leave, which I simply accepted.
He has my email if he changes his mind.
J Wales
It looks a little shaky this am. It really depends on the data coming out.
I'm watching comparative volume if we retest.
GDP 3rd revision of 2017Q4 chain weighted bumped up 14 Billion which nudged the YOY GDP growth up fractionally to 2.58%. Headline number of 2.9% should be ignored. The real GDP growth YOY is 2.5819% up from the 2.4989% 2nd revision of 2017Q4.
Trade deficit I heard this am is in the -70 billion dollar range largest since fall of 2008 which I think helped GDP. Heard inventories were up.
I heard Rick Santelli say 1st qtr 2018 GDP shaping up to not even hit 2 handle.
Also heard an interview by Jeff Currie of GS who appears to be saying the initial tariffs were draconian and difficult to implement and that has deescalated. Politicians rolling over and backing off due to impact of inflation concerns.
Pending home sales month over month +3.1% but as we do with GDP the YOY number is -4.4%
S&P 200 DMA is 2587.25. We are very far away from death cross so that is good, but we need to keep an eye on this. The S&P 50 DMA = 2736.38. It would take alot of downside to pull this 50 DMA below the 200 DMA for the death cross.
Flattening yield curve. Need to keep an eye on this.
Lots for investors to ponder.
smile
.
Fourth Quarter 2017, GDP revised higher to 2.9.
.
Report from DShort:
Home Price Surge Continues in January
by Jill Mislinski, Mar 27
With today's release of the January S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Index, we learned that seasonally adjusted home prices for the benchmark 20-city index were up 0.75% month over month. The seasonally adjusted national index year-over-year change has hovered between 4.2% and 6.3% for the last two-plus years. Today's S&P/Case-Shiller National Home Price Index (nominal) reached another new high.
Ok Smile thanks. I understood the little shaky part. My eyes glazed over after that. A little shaky is how I get when my bloid sugar drops too low. Pretty easy to fix. But it can turn to something worse if not addressed promptly. Do you think the fed is getting ahead of itself? I read where the fed is trying to establish a higher level of rates so they have more room to drop rates when the time comes. Judging from your comments inflation really isn't a problem so far. Is that your view?
J Wales,
Believe me I understand, economic stats can cause the ol' eye balls to glaze over and even roll back.
Short answer to your question is yes IMO inflation is not a problem.
The fed needs to stop raising rates - allow for a bigger pause (6 months at least) to see what the economy does - there is no real inflation past their targeted 2%. They may even want to slow down on their QT.
===
If you want some more glaze for your eyes keep reading or just stop with the above.
The interview I heard this am. w/ J. Currie if what he said was true says that the tariffs are being walked back and therefore no trade war which is a good thing.
Powell will not want to be the cause of a market collapse which may be triggered if short yields break above long yields - there is only about 50 or so bips (basis points) to go before that happens. So I think he is stuck here unless we see some sort of inflationary spiral somewhere.
A couple of the stats I mentioned GDP and housing YOY confirms inflation not a problem. GDP when looked at correctly which is YOY not quarterly annualized says we are still stuck at or near the mid 2.5% growth rate which is goldilox IMO. It may not be fast enough to offset those massive deficits coming which is another problem to keep on the radar.
Earnings parade should start soon hopefully the expectation is not ahead of the reality.
smile
Last man standing:
Yesterday the NAZ was the only major U.S. index still positive YTD.
Same holds true today, except it has declined further. NAZ now +0.66% YTD.
JC
Support and Resistance Levels (MarketEdge)
DJIA:
23360 - Support - The 02/09/2018 low
26616 - Resistance - The 1/26/2018 high
25310 - 50-day simple moving average
23279 - 200-day simple moving average
S&P 500:
2532 - Support - the 02/09/2018 low
2872 - Resistance - 1/26/2018 high
2748 - 50-day simple moving average
2579 - 200-day simple moving average
NASDAQ:
6630 - Support - the 02/09/2018 low
7560 - Resistance - the 03/09/2018 high
7279 - 50-day simple moving average
6701 - 200-day simple moving average
JC
Earnings are what stocks live & die on. Not tabloid scandals & disgruntled people looking for 15 minutes of fame. Not the distractions & drama the media slings 24 7. I watch no tv news. I read until it becomes clear there's very little value in most stories. I enjoy your analysis Mr Smile. :)
JC----Thanks for the support & resistance levels--printed it & will keep it for reference--good info---dj
I have been very lucky with the BUY calls from boB. After the last "BUY NOW" call, I went out and bought a big screen TV and a few six packs.
Did so much better than with the QQQ counter trend rally.
Honeybee, do you recall Bob ever issuing a buy message in his newsletter or has it always been via special message?
Pig,
Is this "big screen TV" to which you refer?
https://youtu.be/hbidY6YTtns
I wonder if our Beloved Bacon Boy will be the . . . ahem . . . "center of attention" at Sunday's Easter Dinner?
I will call my sis and report back.
Anonymous Mad as HELL ! said... Pig,
Is this "big screen TV" to which you refer?
That's pretty funny! I had something similar when we got our first flat screen from Circuit City. I asked the delivery guys if they wanted the big box TV that still worked pretty well. One said "yes" we'll put it in our truck. The other guy said "how are we going to get it to your house, strap it to your hood?" The smarter guy said "NO, we'll swing by my house with the truck". Smart!
Good news for me, not so good news for our Beloved Bacon Boy.
I called my sister and we're having ham on Sunday! YUM YUM!
.
Why Bruce? Is it one of Pig's distant cousins? :)
Honey: Yes, I think it might be. But PLEASE don't tell him!
TIA!
For those still interested in the QQQ trade I would like to share my story.
Since I am retired and had additional time I decided to search for my 1040 schedule D from the year 2001 and see how stocks purchased in the past were doing today (March 29, 2018).
I did indeed locate my 2800 share QQQ trade purchased over a few weeks in the Fall season of 2000 at a cost basis of 75.75 ($212,000).
As of March 29, 2018, the shares have a value of $448,364 for a 111.39% gain or 4.38% annualized. The return does not take into consideration any dividends.
Of course, I sold the shares in 2001.
.
American Radio Design....You gave your purchase amount, but not your sales amount. If you sold in 2001, you must have lost a ton of money. Would you share that with us?
Also, I want you and everyone to know that Bob Brinker did not recommend holding those shares until now.
In the October 2012 issue of Marketimer he recommended that those who were "holding QQQ's" sell them. The price at that time was $67.26. Brinker's "Act Immediately" bulletin to buy, in October 2000, the price was $83.00.
So even after holding for TWELVE YEARS, Brinker had his followers sell at a HUGE LOSS, whereas if they held a few more years they could have made money - as you pointed out.
Honeybee said... So even after holding for TWELVE YEARS, Brinker had his followers sell at a HUGE LOSS, whereas if they held a few more years they could have made money - as you pointed out.
Now I'm confused again. Is that the hallmark of a renowned Market Timer with over 30 years experience on National radio or a charlatan that wanted to bury a HUGE mistake?
IMO that's ALMOST as stupid as giving a definite sell point on National radio for subscribers in a counter-trend rally. Who could ever be that dumb?
.
Pig...I was absolutely shocked when I read the sentence which was buried in a paragraph in the October 2012 Marketimer about "those holding QQQ" should sell them.
As you recall, he never mentioned that trade again after he covered it up in March 2003 when he bought the mutual fund that is a proxy for QQQ AND ADDED IT TO HIS MODEL PORTFOLIOS AFTER THE Q'S HAD LOST ABOUT 80%.
So the answer to your question as it pertains to what Brinker did with that QQQ trade: Yes, he acted like a charlatan and wanted to bury not only the buy, but the sell also.
It's very likely that he or the Jr. Bob Brinker got tired of being asked when the trade was going to end, so they provided themselves an easy answer.
But along with the sentence that I mentioned above, there was zero guidance about price or date - just sell them.
Re: QQQ, for comparison . . .
Holding Schwab's total stock index (SWTSX) from inception in 6/1999 til today returned +6.53% annualized.
Larry Kudlow's last radio show, "at least for now."
Honeybee asked: "American Radio Design....You gave your purchase amount, but not your sales amount. If you sold in 2001, you must have lost a ton of money. Would you share that with us?"
The 2800 QQQ shares were sold in Feb., 2001. The total received was $140,974.
.
Thank you American Radio Design!
So you lost $71,026 because of following Bob Brinker's advice.
If you subscribed during that time, or if you read my blog when I was covering the monthly Marketimer recommendations on the QQQ's, you are aware that Brinker made at least three different buy-recommendations as the QQQ's dropped (much like he did with his 2008 buy signals as the market dropped).
Then he put them on "HOLD" and followed up with monthly "hold for recovery" advice until March, 2003.
He never accounted for those trades in any of his official portfolio - so losses like never went against his performance record. Mark Hulbert knows that but ignores it, and rates Brinker so high as to be on his "honor roll" which Brinker brags about.
I think I can find the actual documentation that I put together and posted on Suite 101 (gone now) in my files. Let me know if you (or anyone) want to see it.
I think I can find the actual documentation that I put together and posted on Suite 101 (gone now) in my files. Let me know if you (or anyone) want to see it.
I'd love to see some light shed on the subject.
.
Okay Pig....It might be next week, but I'll track down the information and post at least part of it.
Chances Brinker will be live on Easter?
.
I think there is an excellent chance that Brinker will be live today.
My family plans to celebrate Easter are today, but Frankj's family plans will allow him to do the summary for us today.
Hi Honeybee,
Happy Easter! Question-- I know Brinker sold his shares of Metro West bond fund but I've kept mine.....and so far haven't taken a big hit...I'm curious what others r doing, opinions etc if they sold, or are keeping and watching the market....I've heard other Financial advisers say in the market of raising rates u need an unconstrained bond fund....any feed back is welcome...I'm pretty much following Brinkers fund #3 with a few twists.
Brinker's Annual Easter Parade ...
Recent History of BB's Easter Program:
Easter Broadcasts
Apr 1 2018 ???
Apr 16 2017 LIVE
Mar 27 2016 LIVE
Apr 5 2015 LIVE
Apr 20 2014 LIVE
Post a Comment