Friday, December 9, 2011

December 9, 2011, Bob Brinker and Lakshman Achuthan Headed for Recession Showdown

December 9, 2011.....................................................................(comments)

Bob Brinker has said that he's positive the economy is NOT  headed for another recession.  On Moneytalk, Brinker has repeatedly denigrated those who are predicting a recession and he's focused like a laser on ECRI's Lakshman Achuthan, who said in September that the economy is "tipping into recession." Now Achuthan says we won't know one way or the other until this time next year.

Yesterday, Achuthan made a guest appearance on Bloomberg. He has not changed his mind about his recession forecast and he explains why. He also talks about the stock market as a recession indicator.  Here is a summary and excerpts from the video interview:
Dec. 8 (Bloomberg) -- Lakshman Achuthan, chief operations officer of the Economic Cycle Research Institute, talks about the U.S. economy. He speaks with Tom Keene on Bloomberg Television's "Surveillance Midday."
Tom: "You had a recession call, what happened?

Achuthan: "It's happening."

Tom: "I saw too many economists talking 3% GDP."

Achuthan: "I talked to you  right here September 30th. That was two months ago. A lot of economists, as they always do, are focusing on incoming data, a lot of which is coincident or short-leading. And there is, indeed, has been stronger coincident and short-leading data over the last couple of months,  since I saw you. So we learn from that....the recession very likely did not begin in Q3. I don't know about Q4 or the next couple of quarters......Well, in late September, we thought we were tipping into recession. We just don't know when it started."

Tom: "Explain this, this is really important.....There are two ways you look at a call. You look at the vector of the call -- the direction of the call,  and you look at the timing of the call. Amateurs look at the timing of the call. Oh, Laksman, you are in the time-out chair. You got it wrong. Pros look at the vector, or direction of the call. So you maintain the direction of your call."

Achuthan: "Yeah, we haven't switched  our call....If there's no recession in Q4 or the first half, then we're wrong. You're not going to know whether or not we're wrong until a year from now. Just to be very clear, jobs data comes in stronger...That means there's no recession, right? Wrong. In the last recession, which began in December of '07, jobs data didn't go negative for another couple of months. It was positive into the recession.  I'll give you an even freakier example, which is the 1973-75 recession. It took nine months inside the recession before jobs went negative....If you look at this kind of stuff....it's not a precise science."

Achuthan continues: "A recession is a contraction in production, employment....income and sales.....In the 2001 recession, we lost 3 million jobs.....Here, we've lost 8-something  million.....We've gained back 2-something....Here's the point, in the 2001 recession, for example, for those who were waiting for two negative quarters of GDP, you may not even get that.....In 2001, you never had two quarters straight of negative GDP, but yet you had 3 millions jobs lost.  So it was a real, bonafide, nasty recession. In the 2008 recession, all the way in August, a month before Lehman -- we were 8 months inside the recession. But if you're looking backwards, you don't see any negative GDP."

Achuthan said this about the following chart: "The downturn we have now is very different from the downturn in 2010 which did not persist. This downturn is persisting. That is a forward-looking indicator. So far, we've been talking about coincident data, production, jobs.... now casting backwards.....That forward looking data in the same period since I saw you two months is getting weaker. It's not turning up....

....So to my fellow forecasters out there. I'd say they're roughly in two camps. There are those that say the economy will continue to firm into next year. We reject that. There's nothing here that suggests that at all. I think there's a larger camp that says we are going to muddle through. We're going to get this kind of slow growth.....I'm going to point out that that has never happened. We never muddled through.... A market economy does not want to have a static state. It either accelerates or it decelerates, and these forward-looking cycle indicators say decelerates."



Tom:  "This chart shows personal disposable income -- inflation adjusted. Clearly an ugly chart that captures so much of our anxiety. What does the recent data show?"

Achuthan:   "There's the other half of the GDP report. Everybody got excited because GDP rose a couple of percent in Q3. Just before Thanksgiving, you got the other half of that report. A revision called the Gross Domestic Income.  Conceptually, it's the same thing. It just adds it up from the other side. It adds up all the income instead of all the purchases. In theory, they should match. They never do....

.....The problem here is that GDI tends to be the more accurate measure. GDP tends to get revised toward GDI, at least in recent years. The Fed has been focused on this. And GDI, in the last reading, was 0.3%....That's a far cry from two handle. That's a big gap......I read a Fed paper that suggests the revisions will go lower....The Fed points out, when you look at a two quarter annualized growth rate of GDI, if it gets to 2% or lower, that's a recessionary stall speed. Now that's been trending down for six quarters....The last reading is 0.28% on GDI."

Tom: "What does the ECRI work say about the stock market?" 

Achuthan: "Here's the one thing that I think a lot of  people sometimes forget, it's that the stock market is not the economy....We get caught up.....The stock market is a short leading indicator. It's imperfect. It makes mistakes on recession forecast......But if you look closer, the stock market gets the acceleration and deceleration of the economy pretty good....And I think if you step back from the last few weeks or couple of months and look at the big picture, the stock market has very clearly reacted to our growth rate slowdown call from last April."

Tom: "Here's a chart from the Congressional Budget Office.  It's on the edge of ECRI work....There's the current cycle, the white line, normalize to the middle of the chart. So you go past to the left, forward to the right. The yellow's normal. The glide path of that white line to the right ain't so pretty."


Achuthan: "There's a huge problem there.....Back in '08, in the middle of the last recession, we were able finally in hard data, not a forecast, present how the pace of each expansion since the 1970's has been getting lower and lower.....Plus I think we all agree the cycle of volatility has gone up. The economy hasn't gotten mellower......Volatility plus low trend equals more recessions. It's in that context that we are making this recession call."


Moneytalk, November 6th, Bob Brinker said: "My estimate is that we will see growth again in the fourth quarter, which means, where's the recession? You know, we have these private forecasters out there going around beating the drums of recession. Warning everybody that the US is going back into recession. Batten down the hatches and get in the bomb shelter because we are in a lot of economic trouble. That is what they say, but that's not what we see. So far, we see an economy that continues to grow slowly.......One of things that amazes me about the private firms that are forecasting a  recession in here is their conviction. I mean they talk about it like it's a fait accompli. They talk about it like it's for sure -- take it to the bank. Well I'm not taking it to the bank. What do you think about that? I think these forecasters are wrong, but I'll look forward to their apology....this is Moneytalk." 

So it looks like Bob Brinker and Lakshman Achuthan are headed for a showdown. Will Bob eat crow, or will Achuthan apologize? Please see my original coverage of this subject: October 20, 2011: "Lakshman and Bob in the Thunderdome. Two men enter, one man leaves"  LINK

7 comments:

jeffchristie said...

Lakshman pointed out that the last recession began in December 2007. In May 2008 Bob Brinker gave his now famous Cassandra rant on Moneytalk. Here is part of what he said:


RECESSION CASSANDRAS.... Brinker said: “What we have right in here now is evidence that the Cassandras, who earlier this year, were telling us we were in recession – right now they’ve basically – well I’ll be kind, basically, they look like fools right now. Because all that they’ve accomplished with their talk about recession…………all that they have to show for their efforts is that they scared the people who listened to them out of the stock market this past winter……….”

CORRECTION LOW AND TESTS.... Brinker said: “……..And probably a lot of those people got scared out near the correction lows....... The initial correction low in January, which was successfully tested in mid-March, before the market reversed and resumed its uptrend. And basically, if you were to total up all of the accomplishments of the Cassandras, that would be it – that they scared people out of the market during a stock market correction in the first quarter………..Because they have been unable to present any evidence of a recession."

LOST JOBS.... Brinker said: “And your questions to the Cassandras should be where are the millions of lost jobs that we would expect to see in a recession? In fact, in this economic slowdown, so far, we’ve only lost a few hundred thousand jobs total – dating back to the beginning of this year…………”

STOCK MARKET BEARS.... Brinker said: “So what we have here basically, is an example of false prophets and it’s sad. And the reason it’s sad is the damage done. Think of the people that are looking today at the market, S&P at 1400 and they’ve been scared out of the market in the first quarter by these bears………It’s just amazing and yet these people are out there, and these people are not happy, I’m sure, to find themselves out of a rising market since March. To find themselves looking for ever lower prices when in fact we’ve had the opposite.

.......
We’ve had the market rising since mid-March. It’s rather significant when you stop to think about it. If you go back to mid-March and you take a look at the S&P 500 Index since mid-March, right now you have a total return, including cash dividends of about 10 1/2%...........................So it’s fair for you to say to the Cassandras, where is that recession, where are those millions of lost jobs, where are the two quarters of negative real GDP growth? Where’s the bear market? …………The answer is, they blew it! That is the answer, they blew it. They got caught up in their own negativity and they pronounced that it was all over, it was going to spiral downward and there was no end in sight – and they got it completely backwards.. Truly amazing to see, and sad to see the people that are harmed by such unjustified negativity.”


WHERE'S THE BEAR MARKET? It was just over the horizon Bob. It was the biggest bear market in your career and you blew it.

Anonymous said...

In 2001, you never had two quarters straight of negative GDP, but yet you had 3 millions jobs lost. So it was a real, bonafide, nasty recession. In the 2008 recession, all the way in August, a month before Lehman -- we were 8 months inside the recession. But if you're looking backwards, you don't see any negative GDP."

So ECRI says we might not even know we're in a recession for a year or more.

Even then they seem to make up their own definition of what constitutes a recession and this is where I agree with Brinker.

ECRI seems to be saying we can have a recession yet not have two quarters of negative GDP.

Plus ECRI has a proprietary magic black box and refuse to let anybody, including subscriber, take a peek. Baloney!

GDP

birdbrain said...

Many investors are still waiting for Mr B to apologize for steering them fully invested into the worst bear market of their lives.

Bob Brinker calling others false prophets? Pot, I'd like you to meet kettle. Kettle, this is pot.

jeffchristie said...

Anonymous Gronieel

In the United States,the Business Cycle Dating Committee of the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) is generally seen as the authority for dating US recessions. The NBER defines an economic recession as: "a significant decline in economic activity spread across the economy, lasting more than a few months, normally visible in real GDP, real income, employment, industrial production, and wholesale-retail sales." Almost universally, academics, economists, policy makers, and businesses defer to the determination by the NBER for the precise dating of a recession's onset and end.

The NBER determines if we are in a recession not some arbitrary definition for some third rate radio talk show host.

As for black boxes Brinker's timing model failed to call the biggest bear market of his career. ECRI's got it right the last time.

Anonymous said...

Walter:

Definition

A period of general economic decline; typically defined as a decline in GDP for two or more consecutive quarters. A recession is typically accompanied by a drop in the stock market, an increase in unemployment, and a decline in the housing market. A recession is generally considered less severe than a depression, and if a recession continues long enough it is often then classified as a depression. There is no one obvious cause of a recession, although overall blame generally falls on the federal leadership, often either the President himself, the head of the Federal Reserve, or the entire administration.

http://www.investorwords.com/4086/recession.html

Honeybee said...

Jeff....Thanks for reminding us how utterly WRONG Bob Brinker was in 2008. His arrogance toward the recession "Cassandras" was almost equal to his arrogance about the current recession bears. :)

In one of his October 2011 newsletters, David Korn wrote these comments about Bob's formerly high opinion of ECRI:

"I was doing some research in my old newsletters, and Bob quite often during the bull market of 1982-2000 spoke highly of ECRI and even suggested he used their work as at least part of his market timing decisions. The thing is that Bob has been pretty vocal that a recession is not in the cards and Bob has, shall we say, some "issues" with eating crow and quickly admitting he is wrong. That usually comes long after it is quite apparent he has been wrong like after he had predicted no recession in May, 2008. Now he may not be wrong this time. We shall only know in the fullness of time as he would like to say, but I am keeping a much more open mind than he is about this."

Honeybee said...

Birdbrain,

Here are some comments that the whistling tea- "pot" made to the shouting "kettles" in October.

Bob said: "Here's my opinion of those private economists that are yelling recession. I think they're fire in a crowded theater. A lot of people are nervous. A lot of people are apprehensive. A lot of people are unemployed. And I think if you're a private economist and you're yelling recession out there at a time like this, it's just the same as fire in a crowded theater. And inevitably, you know what happens when that happens, people panic. I think we saw some of that recently in the marketplace -- not in October. We are looking so far, at one of the greatest October stock market rallies of all time. We're actually already up over 9% in the month of October, which is amazing -- especially given that backdrop of people out there scaring investors with the R-word."

Of course, the S&P gave back another 80 points in November....