Sunday, December 23, 2012

December 23, 2012, Bob Brinker's Moneytalk: Summary, Excerpts and Commentary

December 23, 2012....Bob Brinker hosted Moneytalk today.....(comments welcome)

STOCK MARKET: It's been months now since Brinker has talked about the stock market. Of course, he is still fully invested and is still forecasting an S&P 500 Index target range of "upper 1400s to lower 1500's."

YOU CAN STILL SELL STOCK THIS YEAR TO PAY LOWER CAPITAL GAINS RATE....Brinker said: "If you have a long-term capital gain, and you're in the top bracket....up until the 31st inclusive, you are able to take that capital gain at the current federal 15% maximum rate.....Under current law, that rate is going up in January. And the top bracket, including the new health care tax, it will be 23.8 federal. That is a 56% increase in the long-term capital gains federal rate.....why pay it?....There are no wash sale rules on capital gains....You can buy it back the next second."

MARKETIMER INCOME PORTFOLIO NOT THE SAME AS FDIC CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT: Caller Larry from Arizona asked about moving money out of CD's into Brinker's fixed-income portfolio.

Brinker reminded Larry that they are very different investments because CD's have FDIC insurance guaranteed to get principal back. Then he said: "Our page seven income portfolio has had an absolutely great year. With only a few days to go, our total return is over 8% year to date. That is outstanding and we're very proud of it, but it very different from CDs....You're right, until something changes in the economy, it's very unlikely that you are going to see a run up in rates."

Honey EC: "Danger, Will Robinson!" Here's a warning to Larry and everyone: Brinker's income portfolio "on page seven" may have done well like most bond funds this past year, but it has been changed drastically over the past three months. Brinker sold all Vanguard High-Yield Fund, Vanguard Short-Term Investment Grade and Vanguard Wellesley Income Fund holdings in that portfolio. I believe that those three funds (that had made up 50% of that portfolio) were much more conservative than the new funds that he has added. (DoubleLine Total Return Fund; Metro West; Dodge and Cox Income Fund (DODIX). 

INTEREST RATES ARE WAY DOWN BUT WON'T STAY THERE FOREVER....Brinker said: "A lot of rates are down. Things like the prime rate is down....That includes the rates that are paid by the Treasury on the sovereign debt. Those are way down....They are so low it's kinda ridiculous.....The good side is that people can borrow money, not pay a lot of interest, buy a car, get a mortgage. But there's a dark side to this.....Who wants to issue a 15 year mortgage at 2.66 -- that's the national average. Here's the problem and I think the big-time spenders in Washington have taken advantage of this. The fact that the Treasury is able to raise this money with these trillion dollar annual deficits, and to finance the sixteen plus trillion dollar national debt that we've accumulated at very low rates. And they say this isn't so bad, look at these low rates we're getting. Here's the flaw that these fools that believe in that don't get. There's no guarantee that rates will stay here forever....

They don't want to hear about fiscal responsibility, moving to a balanced budget.....If rates ever normalize, this national debt is going to cost us a lot. And it's going to hurt our growth, and it's going to hurt our country.....There is no way of knowing what this debt will cost us over the long-term....I'd be surprised if two-year Treasury Notes can be marketed forever at one quarter of one percent a year...That's dangerous thinking. These people that are addicted to the big-time spending habits are going to have to get real, and until they do, it's a good idea to call attention to the importance of moving to a balanced budget."

WILL MUNI-BONDS BE TAXED IN 2013? Brinker said: "We don't know what any of the tax policies will actually be, but I would  speculate that they will not pass a law to make municipal bonds taxable in 2013. That's just an opinion...I own municipal bonds so I care about this also."

REQUIRED MINIMUM  (IRA) DISTRIBUTIONS....Be sure make required withdrawals before the end of the year. If you miss the deadline, the penalty is 50% of the amount you needed to take out.

WHEN SHOULD YOU TAKE RMDs....You can take them anytime, lump sum or monthly.

BALANCE OUT TAX GAINS AND LOSSES....It's possible to take up to $3000 deduction against income. If you have more than that, you can carry it forward.

GIFTING MONEY TAX FREE....This year you can give up to $13,000 to an unlimited number of individuals. They don't have to be relatives and pay no gift tax. That will go to $14,000 next year.

POLITICS/FISCAL CLIFF/TAXES (Brinker's opinions quoted or synopsized): "Who let the dogs out? It's definitely X-rated governance or lack thereof." ......A couple of things the president really wants to get done by the end of the year -- holding the tax rates where they are for 98% of taxpayers....and an extension of unemployment benefits for the 2 million that will lose them....Obama is also trying to "avoid a 2% pay cut for everybody in the country" on New Year's Day.....Congress is a ship of masquerading fools....The tax increase turned down by the House this week would have protected 99.8% of taxpayers. X-rated government.

Honey EC: The fiscal cliff, politics and taxes were the main topic of the day. Most of it was repetition from earlier shows. 

OPPOSING BRINKER'S POLITICAL VIEWS....Caller Bob from Indiana said: "With all due respect, I understand you can't be partisan....but I can be as a listener. When one side in congress believes that wealth comes from borrowing money, taking from producers and printing money, and the other side says, we have to stop the bleeding, we have to stop the spending, I'm grateful.  Because if one side backed down, the other side would willy-nilly take money, borrow money and spend money, and take from productive people, destroy our economy even worse than it's already been destroyed. I'm happy for the fight  and I'm happy that there's an opposition to that side. If I walk up on two people and they're fighting, I don't automatically assume they are both wrong."

Brinker replied: "I'm glad you had a chance to step on that soapbox and tell America what you think. As you see, I gave you an opportunity to do so....I don't think it's that much one-sided. I can be as partisan as I wish to be. On this issue, I'd much rather be reasonable."

Honey EC:  Later on, Brinker slammed Bob by calling him an "absolutist," while denying that he was criticizing him.  Well, I'm not being critical either,  Brinker, but why do you completely ignore the fact that the president and fellow democrats have refused to make any meaningful spending cuts in exchange for John Boehner's offer to allow tax increases for the top 2%?

DEBT CEILING....Brinker said: "We are getting close. The Treasury Secretary is going to alert congress that he has run out of borrowing capacity, because borrowing capacity is roughly $16.4 trillion......The rating agencies are watching all of this stuff like a hawk."

BRINKER'S FAVORITE CHARITY = UNICEF (United Nations Children's Fund): Brinker has a link on his website for making donations here.  Several times today, Brinker praised this charity and said he was proud to contribute to it.  However, there was a caller who claimed that the CEO of UNICEF was paid  a million dollars a year. Later Brinker said that was not true, that he only made a half million dollars a year.

 Honey EC: That's the first time I've ever seen a link to a charity on Brinker's website. I did a quick search and it looks like the CEO of Unicef does make about a half million a year. Bear in mind that the leader of the Salvation Army makes $13,000 a year.  AND they are not part of the United Nations....

Guest-writer, FrankJ's third hour summary:


Bob’s 3rd hour guest on Sunday’s MoneyTalk program was Barbara Weltman, a contributing editor to J.K. Lasser’s, Your Income Tax.   Barbara has been a guest on MoneyTalk in past years, and Bob described her as a walking compendium of the tax code, which indeed, she is.

Bob lamented that because of Congress’s inaction, we won’t know what tax policy will be in 2013 (for taxes payable in 2014).  Barbara “saw his bet and raised him”  by pointing out that 50 or so provisions expired at the end of 2011 and we still don’t know for 2012, which of these, if any might be brought back to life, retroactively, for the 2012 tax returns. 

One expired provision that needs revisiting is the annual “patch” for the Alternative Minimum Tax.  Without a fix, this extra tax could snag 26 million taxpayers, whereas normally “only” 3-4 million taxpayers get hit.  Barbara described a few of the things that trigger the need to calculate one’s liability for the AMT:    a large number of personal and dependency exemptions; and large deductions for state income taxes and/or medical deductions. 

This reference discusses some of the expired tax provisions Barbara alluded to.  


 People in states that do not have a state income tax have been able to deduct their state sales tax.  This provision went away in 2012 and unless Congress restores it, they are out of luck.  At one point in the program, Washington state was mentioned and Bob commented on its beauty.  (A good question for the MoneyTalk final exam might be what city did Bob live in when he lived in Washington?  -- Hint, it ain’t Seattle.)  Washington is also one of the few states without a state income tax, so unless Congress reinstates the sales tax deduction, Washingtonians who itemize will get hosed.  

Two other “above the line” deductions that Barbara mentioned are education related.  These are reductions to gross income, and a taxpayer does not need to itemize on Schedule A to take advantage of these.  One is the educator expenses deduction whereby a teacher can deduct up to $250 for classroom materials they bought out of their own pocket.  ($500 if both spouses are teachers.) 

The other one is the “tuition and fees” deduction of up to $4000, thus reducing the amount of your income subject to tax by this amount.  This deduction is available to people who may be pursuing higher education but not enrolled in a degree program.   For example, it can impact people taking a course here and there to improve job skills.  From the J.K. Lasser website:

On 2010 returns filed in 2011, millions of taxpayers claimed various tax breaks:
  • More than 12 million claimed education credits worth $12.5 billion ($6 billion of which was refundable).
  • More than 2 million claimed the tuition and fees deduction worth $4 billion.
  • More than 10.2 million claimed a deduction for student loan interest worth $9.3 billion.
Source: Statistics of Income Bulletin, Winter 2012

Another topic that came up on the program had to do with proof of having made a charitable contribution.  The IRS has some specific, but easily understood rules on this.  The caller asked about contributions above $250.   Barbara’s answer was that you need some backup, regardless of the size of the contribution.   This backup comes into play if you itemize deductions using Schedule A.   Only if you “itemize” do you get to make charitable deductions.

In brief,  the rules say that a canceled check showing the name of the organization, date and amount is adequate backup.   A bank statement, credit union statement also work.  Payroll deductions are documented with pay stubs or a W-2.  And, a receipt from the charity will work, too. 

When you get to $250 or more, you need something in writing from the charity. 
 
As to when you actually make the contribution, the IRS looks at when it was “unconditionally delivered” to the charity.   So, a check you mail to the charity is considered  “delivered” on the date you mailed it.   A charge to your credit card is “delivered” and deductible in the year you made the charge.  A pay-by-phone charge is deductible in the year the financial institution actually pays the amount. 

Non Cash contributions have their own set of rules, which were not discussed on the show.

 Barbara also mentioned a few things that people might do in the waning days of 2012. 

·       Reset a basis.  Sell a security and repurchase it and thereby establish a higher basis.  If there is a capital gain, it will be at current rates, which are scheduled to go up from 15% now, to 20% in 2013.
·       There was the usual advice about booking capital losses.  Capital losses offset capital gains dollar for dollar.  If your capital losses exceed your gains, they do not go to waste, you can use up to $3000 to offset ordinary income, and if you still have capital losses, you can carry them forward to the next tax year. 

·       Bob pointed out there are 5 trading days left in the year. 

(FrankJ) Editorial Comment:  I like listening to Barbara because she is so knowledgeable in a complex field of endeavor, the US tax code, and she can explain things well.  Barbara is to taxes as Charlie Maxwell is to energy.  However, given that some listeners might actually act on the advice she renders, I think it would  have been more useful for her to on the program earlier than Dec 23.  

Jeffchristie's Moneytalk Final Exam Question:

Bob Brinker's special quest today was Barbara Weltman from the J K Lasser tax service.  J K Lasser was the father in law of which Hollywood star?

A) Jane Fonda

B) Woody Allen

C) Wesley Snipes

D) Lindsey Lohan

Answer:

San Francisco, Ca. KSFO 560: 1-4pm (KSFO archives Moneytalk Free on Demand for seven days after broadcast. You can download and listen on the go.)  


22 comments:

Honeybee said...

birdbrain said...

The following is written with apologies to Clement Clarke Moore:

Twas the day of the Starship
When all through the show
No mention of the market
Not even a portfolio

Politics and opinion
Dominated the day
Which caused frustrated listeners
To cry out in dismay

Do you see a downturn in stocks?
Sell now and lock in cap gains to pay?
Did you adjust the timing model?
They were all screened away.

Yet the host whose main goal
Is a newsletter to hawk
Says with a straight face
This is Moneytalk

Happy Christmas to all, and to all a good night.

john said...

thanks for the update honeybee. I was surprised bob was on sunday he usually takes holidays off. I guess he needs the revenue and I suppose he was pushing his newsletter through out the show. I hope you and all the honey bee posters have a great Christmas and a happy new year John

Honeybee said...

What's Behind the Muni Bond Selloff

Boca Pete said...

A caller to todays Moneytalk Program suggested to Bob ( and he agreed by calling the suggestion "a no-brainer") that part of a compromise bill to avert the so-called "fiscal cliff" should include "MEANS TESTING SOCIAL SECURITY".

As far as I know, SOCIAL SECURITY IS ALREADY "MEANS TESTED" in the tax code as follows:

1.) Social Security starts out being 50% excluded from gross income. When a taxpayer's total adjusted gross income exceeds the low $34,000 and $44,000 levels (as of 2007) for Single and Joint Married couples respectively, only 15% os social security gets excluded and 85% gets included in adjusted gross income.

2.) Then there's the increasing taxation of recognized social security through the progressive tax rate schedules applied to compute tax on taxable income. They start at taxing social security included in taxable income at 10%, then 15%, then 25%, then 28%, then 33%, and currently top out at 35% for year 2012 and rise under current law for 2013 and beyond.

3.) And then there's the progressive State Income Tax tables...

YES, SOCIAL SECURITY IS ALREADY MEANS TESTED in the tax code!!!

ANYONE SUGGESTING "FURTHER 'MEANS TESTING' OF SOCIAL SECURITY" should be ashamed of themselves for displaying such ignorance in my opinion!

P

Anonymous said...

"YES, SOCIAL SECURITY IS ALREADY MEANS TESTED in the tax code!!!"

That's not means testing by any stretch of the imagination. That's simply a determination of the tax rate you pay on Social Security benefits. Boca somehow assumes that your Social Security is the last dollar you earned and therefore in the highest tax bracket.

Real means testing is whether a person gets any Social Security benefits AT ALL...depending on how rich they are.

Wealthy, high earners like Warren Buffett certainly don't need Social Security and therefore should not get if if they are "entitled" to it.

Most Social Security recipients get back far more than they every contributed and this is part of the problem

SS Ben

Runner26 said...

You wrote: 'WILL MUNI-BONDS BE TAXED IN 2013? Brinker said: "We don't know what any of the tax policies will actually be, but I would speculate that they will pass a law to make municipal bonds taxable in 2013. That's just an opinion...I own municipal bonds so I care about this also."'

I was supprised by this posting. This is not correct. Bob said they would NOT pass a law making municipal bonds taxable. Relisten to this statement at about 39:20 into the first hour.

Honeybee said...

Hi Runner26,

Very nice to hear from an old Suite 101 friend.

You are absolutely correct. That was a typo -- a very important one, and I am VERY grateful that you caught it.

Thank you!

Jim said...

I thought I heard a caller ask Brinker on Sunday if he would have any objection to the government raising taxes for those making over $400K/yr. Brinker told the caller he would be fine with that.

Brinker, who falls in that catagory, is always looking to AVOID taxes by investing in Muni-bonds and living in states with no income taxes. I find it surprising he said that. Well Bob, then maybe they SHOULD tax your Munis.

Anonymous said...

Merry Christmas all.

tfb

john said...

Regarding social security and medicare. These entitlements should be means tested in so far as people are living longer due to improving medical discoveries. Its not to far fetched to see one married partner living into the nineties. If you retired at age 65 that's a long time to be collecting benefits.I believe that the age for these benefits will be increased so as to adjust to the reality of the situation. Just my opinion... John

Anonymous said...

Off topic and appalling but important. HoneyBeebadger, feel free to delete.

I do not want Christians, or Jews, Or Islamics forcing anyone to adhere to their religion, by the same principle however I defend their right to practice the dictates of their religion. This order of reasoning is appalling. Hobby Lobby should be allowed to do whatever their faith commands them to do in regard to employee benefits.

More Freedom From religion?

tfb

Honeybee said...

Happy day after Christmas, America! Obama's Santa Claus spending is coming home to roost (with full credit to Jeremiah Wright).

Secretary Geithner Sends Debt Limit Letter to Congress

By: Matt Anderson 12/26/2012
Today, Secretary Geithner sent the following letter to Congress regarding the debt limit.

***

December 26, 2012

The Honorable Harry Reid

Majority Leader

United States Senate

Washington, DC 20510

Dear Mr. Leader:

I am writing to inform you that the statutory debt limit will be reached on December 31, 2012, and to notify you that the Treasury Department will shortly begin taking certain extraordinary measures authorized by law to temporarily postpone the date that the United States would otherwise default on its legal obligations.

These extraordinary measures, which are explained in detail in an appendix​ to this letter, can create approximately $200 billion in headroom under the debt limit. Under normal circumstances, that amount of headroom would last approximately two months. However, given the significant uncertainty that now exists with regard to unresolved tax and spending policies for 2013, it is not possible to predict the effective duration of these measures. At this time, the extent to which the upcoming tax filing season will be delayed as a result of these unresolved policy questions is also uncertain. If left unresolved, the expiring tax provisions and automatic spending cuts, as well as the attendant delays in filing of tax returns, would have the effect of adding some additional time to the duration of the extraordinary measures. Treasury will provide more guidance regarding the expected duration of these measures when the policy outlook becomes clearer.

Sincerely,

Timothy F. Geithner


Debt Limit Letter To

The Honorable John A. Boehner, Speaker of the House

The Honorable Nancy Pelosi, House Democratic Leader

The Honorable Mitch McConnell, Senate Republican Leader

cc: The Honorable Dave Camp, Chairman, House Committee on Ways and Means

The Honorable Sander M. Levin, Ranking Member, House Committee on Ways and Means

The Honorable Max Baucus, Chairman, Senate Committee on Finance

The Honorable Orrin Hatch, Ranking Member, Senate Committee on Finance

All other Members of the 112th Congress

Anonymous said...

The debt ceiling is another game Congress plays EVERY year. They all point fingers at each other and then they increase the debt limit.

Every year...you can take it to the bank.

Sri

Honeybee said...

There's a old saying: "Those who has gets."

Well, those in power has, and we gets the shaft while they revel in Obama's executive order giving them more money. For what?

President Barack Obama issued an executive order to end the pay freeze on federal employees, in effect giving some federal workers a raise. One federal worker now to receive a pay increase is Vice President Joe Biden.

According to disclosure forms, Biden made a cool $225,521 last year. After the pay increase, he'll now make $231,900 per year.

Members of Congress, from the House and Senate, also will receive a little bump, as their annual salary will go from $174,000 to 174,900. Leadership in Congress, including the speaker of the House, will likewise get an increase.

"A new executive order has been issued providing for a new pay schedule beginning 'on the first day of the first applicable pay period beginning after March 27, 2013,'" reports FedSmith.com.


See the list of new Obama raises for congress and the all judges HERE

Honeybee said...

So now we are at the debt ceiling, the deficit is over a trillion a year, and the national debt is quickly closing in on $16.5 trillion.

If someone was deliberately trying to turn us into Greece, what would they do differently than what is being done in Washington now?

Check the little debt clock in the right column of this blog.

Honeybee said...

Well, I'm just a regular bundle of joy today. Sorry.

But here's another dose of reality you won't hear discussed in Washington any time soon. Excerpt:

The actual liabilities of the federal government—including Social Security, Medicare, and federal employees' future retirement benefits—already exceed $86.8 trillion, or 550% of GDP. For the year ending Dec. 31, 2011, the annual accrued expense of Medicare and Social Security was $7 trillion. Nothing like that figure is used in calculating the deficit. In reality, the reported budget deficit is less than one-fifth of the more accurate figure.

Why haven't Americans heard about the titanic $86.8 trillion liability from these programs? One reason: The actual figures do not appear in black and white on any balance sheet. But it is possible to discover them. Included in the annual Medicare Trustees' report are separate actuarial estimates of the unfunded liability for Medicare Part A (the hospital portion), Part B (medical insurance) and Part D (prescription drug coverage).


Read more HERE

Anonymous said...

Is it a coincidence that this Exec Order was issued on what must be one of the slower news weekends of the year?

Why not really show some disdain for taxpayers and hold off on the order until, say, April 14, 2013, the day before taxes are due. Then the admin can say, "oh by the way, it is retroactive to Jan 1 2013."

My two cents,

-- Frankj

Anonymous said...

Obama is demanding that Mitch McConnell allow a straight up-or-down vote on Harry Reid’s fallback proposal, if the two sides cannot reach a deal. If no deal is reached, Obama is daring McConnell to filibuster a continued tax cut for the middle class and daring Boehner not to hold a vote on it.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2012/12/28/obama-to-gop-last-chance/

This is leadership!

Sannje

Honeybee said...

This is not good news for the (about) 50% of us who pay taxes:

$1 Trillion Obamacare Tax Hike Hitting on Jan. 1

On January 1, regardless of the outcome of fiscal cliff negotiations, Americans will be hit with a $1 trillion Obamacare tax hike.


Obamacare contains twenty new or higher taxes. Five of the taxes hit for the first time on January 1. In total, Americans face a net $1 trillion tax hike for the years 2013-2022, according to the Congressional Budget Office.
The five major Obamacare taxes taking effect on January 1 are as follows:

The Obamacare Medical Device Tax: Medical device manufacturers employ 409,000 people in 12,000 plants across the country. Obamacare imposes a new 2.3 percent excise tax on gross sales – even if the company does not earn a profit in a given year. In addition to killing small business jobs and impacting research and development budgets, this will increase the cost of your health care – making everything from pacemakers to artificial hips more expensive.

The Obamacare Flex Account Tax: The 30-35 million Americans who use a pre-tax Flexible Spending Account (FSA) at work to pay for their family’s basic medical needs will face a new government cap of $2500. This will squeeze $13 billion of tax money from Americans over the next ten years. (Currently, the accounts are unlimited under federal law, though employers are allowed to set a cap.)

There is one group of FSA owners for whom this new cap will be particularly cruel and onerous: parents of special needs children. There are several million families with special needs children in the United States, and many of them use FSAs to pay for special needs education. Tuition rates at one leading school that teaches special needs children in Washington, D.C. (National Child Research Center) can easily exceed $14,000 per year. Under tax rules, FSA dollars can be used to pay for this type of special needs education. This Obamacare tax provision will limit the options available to these families.

The Obamacare Surtax on Investment Income: This is a new, 3.8 percentage point surtax on investment income earned in households making at least $250,000 ($200,000 single). This would result in the following top tax rates on investment income:

The Obamacare “Haircut” for Medical Itemized Deductions: Currently, those Americans facing high medical expenses are allowed a deduction to the extent that those expenses exceed 7.5 percent of adjusted gross income (AGI). This tax increase imposes a threshold of 10 percent of AGI. By limiting this deduction, Obamacare widens the net of taxable income for the sickest Americans. This tax provision will most harm near retirees and those with modest incomes but high medical bills.

The Obamacare Medicare Payroll Tax Hike: The Medicare payroll tax is currently 2.9 percent on all wages and self-employment profits. Under this tax hike, wages and profits exceeding $200,000 ($250,000 in the case of married couples) will face a 3.8 percent rate instead. This is a direct marginal income tax hike on small business owners, who are liable for self-employment tax in most cases. The table below compares current law vs. the Obamacare Medicare Payroll Tax Hike:

read more and see graphs

Anonymous said...

"Tuition rates at one leading school that teaches special needs children in Washington, D.C. (National Child Research Center) can easily exceed $14,000 per year."

Who cares? Why should the taxpayer have to subsidize "special needs children" when we have public schools that are crumbling because of lack of funding.

Let the families of these special need kids take care of them.

Phye

Anonymous said...

Actually why should we have public schools at all? The have demonstrably failed to educate and in a globalized economy we can import all the educated workers we want. Globalization has changed the basis for education. By ending public education you would indigenously end up with an uneducated manual labor class so we could stop importing 3rd world immigrants to pick lettuce and mow lawns.

Get rid of public education. If you cannot afford children do not have them, if you don't love your children enough to provide for them, that is your problem for not protecting your genetic investment.

By the way, superior electronic education is available for a fraction of the cost of classroom lead instruction. You can get a superior educational experience for your child for 500-1200 a year.

tfb

Anonymous said...

"Get rid of public education. If you cannot afford children do not have them, if you don't love your children enough to provide for them, that is your problem for not protecting your genetic investment. "

Good in theory.

Would you also go along with total elimination of tax deductions for children?

I heard in Singapore life is good but they don't have a high birth rate so the government encourages the wealthy to breed with tax incentives.

Childless