Sunday, November 20, 2011

November 20, 2011, Bob Brinker's Moneytalk: Summary, Commentary, Excerpts and Discussion

November 20, 2011...........................................................(comments)

Bob Brinker hosted Moneytalk today.  Both of those 800-pound gorillas that were on the Starship last week have grown considerably this week -- the two important topics that Moneytalk travelers are most interested in hearing Bob's opinion about. Namely: the stock market and recession forecasts. Bob did not mention either subject today.

[IN EDIT] Perhaps Bob Brinker didn't want to talk about the stock market yesterday because he is sweating about the fact that last week,  the Dow declined 2.9%, the S&P 500 declined 3.8% and the Nasdaq declined 4.0%.   Now here  on Monday morning (Nov 21st), the Dow and S&P are down another 2%.  The S&P is back to 1189.25. 

On September 22nd, Bob issued a special bulletin, calling the stock market "attractive for purchase" at S&P 1129.  In the November 2011 issue of Marketimer, Bob reminded readers of that bulletin even though the S&P was at 1253.30 on the November issue date.  It was simply bragging, and now starts to look silly. In November, Bob wrote:  
"....we anticipate that the market will transition into a renewed uptrend based on our corporate earnings outlook. In our view, this transition has occurred and we look for S&P 500 Index gains into the low-to-mid 1400s range in 2012."  
There was one caller who asked Bob how the stock market might react if  the Super committee fails to reach an agreement:

SUPER COMMITTEE AFFECT THE STOCK MARKET?  Tom from Nevada told Bob that he was a long-time Marketimer subscriber and ask: "(I'd like to know) how to handle the stock market if this (super) committee decides not to sign anything. Whether that is going to have an effect on our own stock market come tomorrow or Wednesday." 

Bob replied: "Well, ask yourself this Tom. We have triggers, December 23rd, that go into affect  in 2013 for automatic, average, 120 billion annual cuts. That's where we are right now. So whether the committee agrees on anything or they don't agree, you still get the cuts spread over ten years under the current set-up. So either way, it's essentially the same result."

Honey EC: I laughed out loud when I heard Bob's answer to Tom's question. What did he say? Can anybody decipher Bob's  non-answer for me? :)

SUPER COMMITTEE DEADLINE....Bob opined that unless the committee comes up with a last minute deal, they should be re-named the "Loser Committee" -- that they are a national joke.  The deadline for a deal is tomorrow (November 21st) and it's not looking good.  Some of the committee don't want to increase taxes and want to make the George W. Bush tax cuts permanent. Some want to cut entitlement  programs, some don't.

Bob said: "The good news is that even if the Loser Committee continues to fail in coming up with a deal, the triggers take affect December 23rd and they actually go into the budget in January of 2013. Which gives them a whole other year to renege even on that. The bottom line here is that they are supposed to come up with 1.2 trillion dollars in deficit reduction....The cuts would average 120 billion dollars a year starting in 2013, running for ten years through 2022 inclusive."

Honey EC: Amazing creativity and talent for name-calling.

SEQUESTRATION: Bob said that we will be hearing this new word more frequently in the future because it "revolves around the potential failure by the super committee to come up with a plan by Wednesday of this week" and has to do with the automatic trigger.

Honey EC: It's possible that Bob read this article:

Federal Government Spending:
The Super Committee and Sequestration
With Washington’s deadline to cut a targeted $1.5 trillion – but a minimum of $1.2 trillion – in federal spending quickly approaching, many commentators are beginning to doubt the Super Committee will have the political fortitude to make lasting change. What are the consequences of failure, and are these targeted cuts enough to get our nation’s fiscal house in order. Read article at this   LINK
 ANNUAL DEFICIT: Bob said:  "We continue to run 10-digit annual deficits. That means annual deficits of over a trillion dollars......therefore cutting an average of 120 billion dollars from the budget on an annual basis would be a relatively small contribution to the solution." 

Honey EC: This topic was kicked around quite a lot today, but I didn't hear anything that hasn't been discussed before. 

I-BONDS:  Today, there were two calls about I-Bonds.   Gary from Gilroy said he bought some ten years ago with a base rate of about  3%  (according to Bob).  Gary asked if he should hang on to them or cash them in.  Bob advised hanging  on to them because of the great base rate, which Bob said,  "robbed Uncle Sam blind."   I-bonds pay the base rate plus the Consumer Price Index.

HOW TO BUY GOLD: Bob said:  "I would stay away from numismatic coins like the plague. Now if you want to buy gold content coins like the America n Eagle which is priced to its gold content plus a tiny premium.....Or something like a Krugerrand or a Canadian Maple Leaf, that coin is going to be priced almost identically to the gold value of one ounce....The other way to buy it is to buy the Exchange Traded Fund, GLD....You are holding a fund that holds bullion." 

Honey EC: I don't recall ever before hearing Bob mention American Eagle, Krugerrand or Canadian Maple Leaf coins as an okay way to buy gold.

GOLD HEDGE AND POSSIBLE EUROPEAN UNION BREAK-UP:  Bob in Virginia Beach said he "got out of the market" and  asked Brinker if he thought the European Union will break up and if so, what will it do to gold.

Bob Brinker replied:  "My guess is that Europe will muddle through....I think it's possible that Greece will be forced to print up its drachma and go back as an independent currency country.....The country is insolvent....I think that gold does benefit the failure of fiat currencies. But I don't think that Greece going back to the drachma...... is that big of an international event...There's no doubt about it, the failure of paper currency is a good thing for gold. Some people have a hedge in gold for that reason."

US DOLLAR IN DANGER? Caller Dawn from Reno asked Bob if the US dollar was in danger of becoming worth nothing. Bob emphatically answered that the dollar was not in danger.

ARE TARIFFS THE ANSWER?  Caller Victor from Washington made quite a lengthy presentation promoting ending free trade and installing tariffs. Bob sent him to the Starship brig for the remainder of hour two. Bob said: "Victor, where did you learn this economic nonsense that you are preaching?"  Bob cited the Smoot-Hawley Tariffs of the 1930's, the depression and other dire consequence.

INHERITED IRAS....Warren from Michigan, who recently inherited a regular IRA (not a Roth) from his mother, asked Bob if he should take minimum distributions based on his lifetime or his mothers.

Bob replied: "If you inherited this from another family member, not a spouse, then you have to take distributions starting the following year....My understanding is that you are prohibited from rolling it into another plan or making contributions....The schedule you use is the IRS single-life expectancy table.....That would be based on whatever is in the table...."

Honey EC: Fidelity offers an easy-to-read explanation of inherited IRAS at this LINK.

GRANDFATHER BOB BRINKER: Caller Bob from Indiana said: "I hate to disagree with you because you're so likeable. You make me think of my grandfather, so I speak to you respectfully, when I disagree with you......My philosophy on that committee is like an analogy if I was to walk up on two teenagers that were fighting, and it was a slug-fest fight, I don't think that I can automatically conclude that they are both wrong. For all I know, one of those teenagers  jumped the other one from behind when he wasn't looking and he is fighting for his life because he was assaulted. For that reason, I don't believe that just because they (the super committee) are not coming to agreement with each other, does not necessarily mean that they are all wrong...I believe it's possible that six of those committee members are doing the right thing and the other six don't want to do the right thing and that's the reason they can't agree. Before 2008, we had a budget that did not pass a budget which to me screams out fiscal and financial irresponsibility. And six of these people that didn't see fit to pass a budget on on this committee."

 Bob replied: "Well if you are right and everybody else is wrong, why do you think that 84% of Americans think Congress is dysfunctional." 

Honey EC: Bob's political pontification went on for several minutes and then after the break, he continued hammering poor defenseless, Bob from Indiana.  Brinker finished hammering the caller by announcing that he showed his partisanship.  LOL! Duh...Mr. Brinker and what do you do throughout every program? 

Bob spent a lot of time today talking about Europe, but in my opinion, none of his opinions are new. And basically all he did was report what is available in the news or internet.

WHAT'S HAPPENING NEXT WEEK...Monday: Existing Home Sales;  Tuesday: GDP: Wednesday: Durable Goods Orders and Personal Income;  The stock market is closed on  Thursday for Thanksgiving Day and early on Friday.   Here is a LINK  to the full economic calendar,  and a LINK to Bloomberg Major World Stock Futures.

Bob's guest-speaker today was Richard Brandt, who writes about Silicon Valley, "The Google Guys" and "One Click: The Rise of Jeff Bezos and Amazon. com"

36 comments:

Anonymous said...

Bob replied: "Well, ask yourself this Tom. We have triggers, December 23rd, that go into affect in 2013 for automatic, average, 120 billion annual cuts. That's where we are right now. So whether the committee agrees on anything or they don't agree, you still get the cuts spread over ten years under the current set-up. So either way, it's essentially the same result."

Honey EC: I laughed out loud when I heard Bob's answer to Tom's question. What did he say? Can anybody decipher Bob's non-answer for me? :)


This may be the first time Bob has actually used the infamous Chewbacca Defense, see links below:




Definition


Chewbacca Defense In Action

But then Honey Badger doesn't care:

Honey Badger

tfb

Anonymous said...

Honey EC: Amazing creativity and talent for name-calling.

Good thing it is not in his nature to criticize.

Joey

john said...

Honey thanks again for the weekly update if you ever start a subscription service let me know I would be interested. I concur with what Bob said today about the committee being a loser committee. I went out and said last week that I thought there would be a deal. I guess I blew that one. Anyways I now rate all politicians as the lowest occupation and can not be trusted or believed.I think all the members of the committee should be earmarked for their next election as people not to vote for..It really is a shame that our country does not have any leaders and I feel this is a good moment for a Ron Paul to step in and take control..This is just a few of my thoughts but obviosly we will get through this. (maybe ross perot will make a comeback)

jeffchristie said...

When Bob mentioned that you get the cuts either way I jumped to the conclusion that it wouldn't have no effect on the stock market. I suspect if I would have called in later in the program and said Bob you told an earlier caller that the stock market would be bothered if the super committee fails because the cuts happen either way, Bob would probably give me his famous phrase "I didn't say that". It is amazing how he can say things that cause the listener to reach a conclusion yet he has plausible deniability.

Anonymous said...

I think this one is beating Brinker.

Christian letter among 2011 top performers

Commentary: But it’s based on established investing theory

NEW YORK (MarketWatch) — Praise the Lord! A new letter is among this year’s top-performers. It’s explicitly Christian.

Over the year to date through October, Christian Value Investor is up 8.8% by Hulbert Financial Digest count versus a gain of just 0.39% for the dividend-reinvested Wilshire 5000 Total Stock Market Index.

That makes Christian Value Investor the third-best performer out of the 180-plus letters followed by the HFD. Read more on HFD.

Tied for first place, with an 11.1% gain: Cody Willard’s Revolution Investing and Roger S. Conrad’s Utility Forecaster. See Oct. 20 column.

Needless to say, this could be a fluke. But you’ve got to start somewhere. And, while for some reason I don’t seem to have written about the other overtly Christian letter in the HFD screen, Sound Mind Investing, it has consistently edged out the market over the last 15 years, albeit slightly underwater in 2011.

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/christian-letter-among-2011-top-performers-2011-11-21?dist=beforebell

ARQ45

Dan G said...

The bad news is the market is going to hell in a hand basket this morning!

The good news is that the Dow has reached an oversold condition and has also reached the uptrendging 50-day moving average and is close to a chart support level of 11,500.

Time to buy? I hope so!

- Dan G

Anonymous said...

"The good news is that the Dow has reached an oversold condition"

What does "oversold" mean? I see people say the market is overbought or oversold but how can that be?

Isn't there always a buyer and a seller depending on the price? That's why the price moves up and down.

Doesn't "oversold" mean there are more people selling than buying and that's why the price is going down? How can it be "over" anything?

Curious

birdbrain said...

As long as the market continues in the range of 1150-1250 (or lower, which I think it will) Mr B will continue ignoring the main topic and regurgitate "don't buy numismatic coins, Congress is a joke", announce govt economic figures, bemoan our debt crisis, etc. And take calls about same, a la 2008-09.

No "knowledge and tools" to be learned.

Honey, are you receiving hazard pay to summarize this mind-numbing
repetition?

Happy Thanksgiving, all.

Dan G said...

Curious,

Here's BigCharts.com definition of the overbought/oversold indicator called "Stochastic".

"The Stochastic oscillator compares where a security's price has closed relative to its price range over a specifically identified period of time. George Lane, who developed this indicator, theorized that in an upwardly-trending market, prices tend to close near their high, and in a downwardly-trending market, prices tend to close near their low. Further, as an upward trend matures, price tends to close further away from its high, and as a downward trend matures, price tends to close away from its low. Lane's theory is that these are the conditions which indicate the beginning of a trend reversal.

The Stochastic indicator is plotted as two lines, the %D line and the %K line, with values ranging from 0 to 100. Readings above 80 are strong and could indicate that price is closing near its high. Readings below 20 are strong and could indicate that price is closing near its low."

Hope that helps. It's all I got!

Anonymous said...

In answer to Curious on "oversold" and "overbought," I equate those terms to simply mean "over reaction" in whichever direction.

-- Frankj

Honeybee said...

TFB,

Bob Chewbacca Brinker. LOL!

Best Regards....Honey Badger

Honeybee said...

Joey,

Yes, it is certainly not in Bob Brinker's nature to criticize. Just ask him. LOL!

Honeybee said...

Thank you for the nice comments about my summary, John.

I feel your frustration with the politicians in Washington. It seems like so many decisions made there are destructive to the country's well-being. Makes one wonder where their loyalty really lies.

Honeybee said...

Dan,

I going to log-in and take a look at buying FAS...GULP

Honeybee said...

Birdbrain asked: "Honey, are you receiving hazard pay to summarize this mind-numbing repetition?"

I'm not sure that there is enough money in the world to compensate for Bob Brinker's "mind-numbing repetition."

It's a labor of love and hate. Love of truth and hatred for unfettered scams.

Call me "Honey fetter-badger Oakes. LOL!!

Dan G said...

Curious,

I wrote an answer to your overbought/oversold question which I believe appeared briefly, but then disappeared for some reason. Sorry about that.

Kirk Lindstrom said...

"Honey EC: I don't recall ever before hearing Bob mention American Eagle, Krugerrand or Canadian Maple Leaf coins as an okay way to buy gold. "

Go back and check the comments some of us posted in your blog. I believe you will find one that suggests you can buy gold for a very small premium and not rely on some fund going under and you losing access to your gold in some Armageddon like disaster. I believe the comment compared small percentage to the percentage Brinker charged to invest $100,000 for his BJ Group.

It is good to know he reads this blog and pays attention. Hopefully he will continue to learn from the regular posters here! >wink, wink<

Honeybee said...

Dan,

I'm really puzzled now. I have published everything you sent today, and certainly never deleted anything.

I even searched through the spam file in case something didn't get forwarded to me.

So I can't imagine how a post could have gotten here and then disappeared.

Yikes! Halloween is past, so shouldn't be any goblins around. :)

I'm betting that the market will rebound a bit tomorrow. What say you?

Honeybee said...

Kirk,

Interesting...I don't recall the post that you are referring to, so could you give me a hint on how to find it. :)

Honeybee said...

Dan...is this the one you think disappeared? It's post #9, you wrote:

"Curious,

Here's BigCharts.com definition of the overbought/oversold indicator called "Stochastic".

"The Stochastic oscillator compares where a security's price has closed relative to its price range over a specifically identified period of time. George Lane, who developed this indicator, theorized that in an upwardly-trending market, prices tend to close near their high, and in a downwardly-trending market, prices tend to close near their low. Further, as an upward trend matures, price tends to close further away from its high, and as a downward trend matures, price tends to close away from its low. Lane's theory is that these are the conditions which indicate the beginning of a trend reversal.

The Stochastic indicator is plotted as two lines, the %D line and the %K line, with values ranging from 0 to 100. Readings above 80 are strong and could indicate that price is closing near its high. Readings below 20 are strong and could indicate that price is closing near its low."

Hope that helps. It's all I got!"

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

I defer to Dan G!!

-- Frankj

Anonymous said...

Call me "Honey fetter-badger Oakes. LOL!!

ROTFLMAO...

tfb

Dan G said...

"Dan...is this the one you think disappeared? It's post #9, you wrote"

That's the one, HB. I don't know what happened to it, but it appears there now...and now twice, in fact! Gremlins!

Anyway, the futures are up a skosh (another old Japanese technical term, meaning "skoshi" or "just a little"!) Will it hold through the night and throughout the day tomorrow? Anybody's guess.

But the two days before a holiday are usually bullish. Not always, but usually. And with the stochastic oscillator now around 20 or so, I'm thinking YES...maybe!

Honeybee said...

Dan...Now I am really spooked. LOL! I only see it once. We must have gremlins.

I with you on thinking we may have a market rebound going into the holiday. Or maybe it's wishful thinking. :)

Anonymous said...

I agree with Brinker's view that it was a Loser Committee. I have preferred to call it the Stupid Committee. However, I think the blame should be with whoever came up with the idea. They clearly did not think about where the process would likely end. The real solution would have been to select the supercommitte and require each member's resignation from Congress on the day before Thanksgiving if they were unable to reach any agreement.

Jorge

Dan G said...

HB, I am afraid it was wishful thinking. The market can't seem to get out of its own way!

Once again the market was all over the place today. Even UP for a microsecond or two! But the Dow did close almost at its support level of 11,500. And it's really, really ovesold now. So...maybe tomorrow? Yeah, maybe!

Anonymous said...

"And it's really, really ovesold now. So...maybe tomorrow? Yeah, maybe!"

Or maybe it will just get really, really oversold.

Are you sure there is such a thing as oversold and overbought? And what does it mean?

More sellers than buyers means lower prices and that's what we saw again today. How can there be an oversold condition if you have a seller and a buyer?

curious

Dan G said...

Curious, I answered your question as well as possible. Overbought and oversold have nothing to do with volume. It has to do with how fast the market has gone up or down.

And yes, it can continue to go down though oversold. And it seems like it will do exactly that according to the current futures.

But normally, if we're in a bull market, it's more likely that an oversold condition will result in a rally. More likely does not mean "fer sure" however.

That's the best I can do, Curious. TA is not for everybody.

- Dan G

Honeybee said...

This video shows a beautiful side of life. Turn up speakers and have a Kleenex handy:

Blind Kitten Plays With Toy for the First Time

Anonymous said...

THIRTEEN YEARS OF ZERO RETURN!

S&P 500 Index
Tue, Nov 22, 2011
Closing Price: 1,188.04
Open: 1,192.98
High: 1,196.81
Low: 1,181.65

http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/historical/default.asp?symb=spx&closeDate=11%2F22%2F11&x=0&...

Now, let's take a13-year trip back in time, shall we...

S&P 500 Index
Fri, Dec 18, 1998
Closing Price: 1,188.03
Open: 1,179.98
High: 1,188.89
Low: 1,178.2

http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/historical/default.asp?symb=spx&closeDate=12%2F18%2F98&x=0&...

Stocknot

Dan G said...

One more thought to "Curious" who says there must be a seller for every buyer. Not true!

Consider a seller of 1M shares of, say, IBM who offers his shares "at the market". There may be dozens of buyers on the other side of that trade, even though the number of shares bought and sold is equal.

Still this has nothing to do with stochastics. If you really want to understand it, re-read the definition of the overbought/oversold stochastic oscillator as presented above.

Honeybee said...

Stocknot,

I am well aware that you are not the author who put that information together, but it is "public" information, so I published it.

That said, it is quite astounding!

Anonymous said...

"One more thought to "Curious" who says there must be a seller for every buyer. Not true!

Consider a seller of 1M shares of, say, IBM who offers his shares "at the market". There may be dozens of buyers on the other side of that trade, even though the number of shares bought and sold is equal."

Oh Dan, I didn't mean to imply that there ever had to be an EQUAL number of buyers and sellers. I just meant that in a truly free market there should be a buyer and a seller if the price is right.

That's what makes the market. The price will go up or down until a buyer and seller are found.

I see that we must be really, really, really oversold again today. These technical signals are very useful I guess, if you know what you are looking for.

Curious

Anonymous said...

OK, I found this. It says stocks are oversold when they have moved down "too much". It doesn't say anything about very, very, very oversold.


Oversold

Investment Dictionary -> Oversold

When we apply "oversold" as a market indicator, it is supposed to give us indications for the current market stage and whether one should buy or sell at this point of time. The word "oversold" is usually applied with regard to trading practices.

In general, the term "oversold" is used to describe a situation in which the stocks have fluctuated downwards too much.

"Oversold" is defined as the point at which prices have moved down in a quick manner. If the market is considered to be oversold, the financial experts will start buying.

When market indicators show a drop in the price level over a brief time period, moving down excessively and quickly, the market becomes "oversold". This stage of the market indicates the transfer of an extensive number of low price shares from one category of participants to another. This activity requires considerable selling power, which exhausts the actual number of sellers who may agree to keep giving away their shares at the low prices, offered to them. Individuals no longer agree to sell shares and this indicates a critical point for the market: now the expected trend is for an upwards reversal.

http://www.investmentterms.net/Oversold-definition/

Dan G said...

A 20% stochastic oscillator reading is considered "oversold". There is no absolute definition of "very oversold" or "very very oversold", but one can think of a reading well below 20% (maybe 18% or so) as very oversold. Or maybe 15% as very, very oversold. Or whatever number you like. There are no absolute rules.

Remember that this is not an exact science. An "oversold" stochastic oscillator suggests (not demands) a rally should be forthcoming. If combined with support levels, moving averages and other TA, the "suggestions" may become stronger. But they are never "fer sure", but only guidelines.

So in a bull market, it's probably (but not absolutely) better to buy an oversold market than an overbought one. But you are free to do just the opposite, or to ignore those readings completely if you wish.