Sunday, July 10, 2011

July 10, 2011, Bob Brinker's Moneytalk: Summary, Excerpts and Commentary,

Posted July 10, 2011....Bob Brinker hosted Moneytalk today. 

Bob Brinker's comments paraphrased, summarized or excerpted:

STOCK MARKET: Brinker said:  "The stock market measured by the S&P 500 at 1363.61 on its high for the year on April 29th had a minor pullback in May and June, bottoming June 15 at 1265.72, for a minor pullback of 7%. Bernadette asked me this  week how do you calculate the size of a correction.....You take the closing high, which was on April 29th at 1363.61, then you take the closing low at 1265.72  and subtract it from the closing high, then you divide the closing high to get the correction....The total return correction was 7% and it lasted for a period of six weeks......Generally, we call a correction a loss in excess of 10% but less than 20%. This was a 7% event. That would certainly qualify as a minor pullback for the market.....The S&P 500 has subsequently traded up to the current level of 1343 and a fraction, and now stands about 1 1/2% below its closing high for the year." 

BOND MARKET: Brinker did not mention bonds or interest rates today.  

UNEMPLOYMENT/JOBS REPORT:  Recent trend continues, some jobs added in private sector, but jobs lost in the  public sector....In the month of July, 39,000 government jobs were lost...Private sector added 57,000.....That's a net increase of 18,000. Unemployment rate up to 9.2%...underemployment rate up to 16.2%....big numbers that may affect the 2012 election.  (Brinker got his info here: BLS)


ECONOMY:  GDP grew at 1.9% annual in first quarter....Later this month the second quarter is expected to be about 2%....

NON-EXISTENT SOCIAL SECURITY  TRUST FUND:  Brinker said:  "When they went  to  the unified budget many years ago, the Social Security trust fund  and all of that malarkey, it went out the window.....There is just one pot of money, so there is no trust fund, so forget about it.....There is no trust fund....The trust fund is a joke."

HOW THEY PAY SOCIAL SECURITY WHEN THERE IS NO MONEY: Brinker said: "The Treasury is running enormous deficits. Something in the area of 1 1/2 trillion dollar annual deficits we've been running in recent years and that's the reason that we've piled up close to 14 1/2 trillion dollars in our national debt. That means that they don't have any money unless they sell Treasuries to raise money, which of course is what they do every week.....So in order to pay Social Security, and I believe they will pay Social Security to the extent that they decide they want to pay it.......But the only way they'll be able to make them in the long term.....is to sell additional US Treasuries to pay out." 

DEBT CEILING HIKE: Brinker said: "Regarding this debt ceiling bruhaha that's going on in Washington. I would like to suggest to you that this is not the real issue facing the country......They must, those in power in Washington, must raise the debt ceiling. They have no choice. They either do it before a government shutdown, in which case, things go on as they are.  Or they do it after a shutdown, like they did back in 1994 -- short government shutdown and then they re-open. In either case, they must raise the debt ceiling....There is no alternative of no debt ceiling increase....It must be raised."

FIXED INCOME ADVISOR MISINFORMATION: Caller Carl from Buffalo Grove, Illinois said: "I'm a loyal subscriber to your Fixed Income Advisor."  Brinker replied: "Thank you." 
Birdbrain said: "Heard a caller during the first hour saying he subscribed to "your Fixed Income Advsor" to which Mr B uttered a quick thank you, without stating that supposedly his son is the publisher of said rag."
 Honey EC:  Obviously, this was one more (of  many) callers who mistakenly believes that the "Bob Brinker" who publishes the Fixed Income Advisor is the host of Moneytalk. This is only made possible by the fact that the real publisher/editor of the newsletter  (Brinker's middle-aged son) no longer makes any  effort to differentiate himself from his father. He used to be very careful to make sure that he was not mistaken for his father, but that changed 5 or 6 years ago, about the same time that  he started selling newsletters.

Some might conclude that Bob Brinker, the talk show host, is deliberately aiding in the deception. That's my conclusion. Readers should decide for themselves. It may also be a clue as to why he doesn't retire when he is well past retirement age, and no doubt reached "The Land of Critical Mass" decades ago.

REAL FISCAL ISSUES FACING THE COUNTRY: Brinker said: "The real issues facing the country in terms of fiscal are the annual deficits that we're running are in the 1 1/2 trillion mega, mega, mega-zone, and the growth of the national debt, which are simply not sustainable. It's already approaching 14 1/2 trillion dollars. Inaction, doing nothing is not option......There has to be some tax reform and spending reform agreement reached in order to move things forward. Tough decisions have to be made. We need leaders. We don't need whiners. The government's own bi-partisan deficit-reduction commission has already given the formula. You cut spending $3, you raise taxes $1. If you cut spending $3 trillion, you raise taxes $1 trillion....They have a formula, at least as a starting point." 

IF THE UNTHINKABLE HAPPENS: Brinker said: "If the United States were to refuse to raise the debt ceiling -- remember, I don't believe that's an option and I don't expect that to happen -- then the credit quality of US Treasuries would be degraded....because of political posturing."  

A TEMPORARY SOLUTION: "Brinker said: "If they want to come up with a temporary hike in the debt ceiling to push this thing out, turn it over to the voters in 2012. Let's have a plebiscite as part of the general election. Well, the candidates will be the answer.  They'll take positions....Let the voters decide which way they want to go." 

POLITICAL BLOCKHEADS PLAYING POLITICAL THEATER: Brinker talked at length about the debt  problems in the European countries -- Greece, Portugal, Italy, Ireland and Spain.  He emphatically explained that the  "sovereign debt" of those countries  is not risk-free. Brinker said: "If any sovereign debt out there is supposed to be risk free, it's  the USA. But wait a minute. We have political blockhead -- and I'm being very kind, I'm in a good mood today, and that's the only reason I'm being very kind -- we have political blockheads in Washington who are running the risk of a default of the United States triple-A rated paper so that they can play their game of political theater. I'm Bob Brinker. This is Moneytalk."  

In his hot-off-the-press weekly newsletter which includes a summary of Moneytalk,  David Korn wrote about caller Maria from El Paso:
REDUCING SUPPLY ON FOREIGN OIL Caller:  This caller said we have millions of tons of natural gas in our country and thinks we should use it to reduce our reliance on foreign oil. Bob said for two years, he and Dr. Wattenburg have been preaching this. Bob noted that Dr. Bill used his own money to purchase an ad in the Washington Post right after the election where he discussed these very things.  The problem is that Bob has seen no results of the ad.  Bob agreed we should be using natural gas in our transit system in a big way.

(Korn) EC:  The ad Dr. Bill placed was in the Washington Post on February 25, 2009 and paid for by Dr. Bill.  It appears on page A2 at the bottom left hand corner.  Dr. Bill actually mentions Bob Brinker in the ad.  Using unpatented and highly non-proprietary DavidK search technology, I found the ad.  Check it out at this url:  Bill Wattenburg Writes Open Letter to Barack Obama, mentions Bob Brinker
 Brinker's guest-speaker was Steven M. Davidoff:   "Gods at War: Shotgun Takeovers, Government by Deal and the Private Equity Implosion"

Moneytalk on demand and to go with Bob Brinker, is available for FREE audio/podcasting at KGO810 radio for seven days after broadcast.  I download and save all three hours, including the third hour guest-speaker. (The program is archived in the 1-4pm time-slots.) If you don't download it from KGO within seven day, it's available at bobbrinker.com by paid subscription. KGO Radio Sunday Archives 

SJ_Al sent these beautiful pictures with these comments:

"Pictures of the Stanislaus River at Sour Grass Crossing, off of Hwy 4 near Dorrington Ca, taken July 2. Sour Grass is about 20 miles downstream of Lake Alpine."


"The river area..... is normally a swimming hole. Not this year. High water like this is typical late April through early June, not in July. The dams upstream are all running over their spillways. In a normal year, the rapids shown in Pic 4318, which is just above the swimming hole, would be inner tube and plastic raft safe."



72 comments:

Anonymous said...

Hi HB,

how many times has BB covered "the fall of Lehman"? will he ever get over "the fall of Lehman"? there is something obsessive here.

it's too bad BB doesn't get it re: govt debt and spending. BB has allowed his Keynesian (sp) leanings to alter his definition of fiscal reality IMO. I would bet BB voted for Obama and will do so again in '12.

HN

Anonymous said...

Comments on a few aspects of Da Brink’s show.

Re: The debt ceiling ands what he references as blockheads playing political theater.

It fascinates me that Da Brink rallies about this as political theater and not about what it is really about: removing a despotic dictator and saving private property rights.

Brinker seems to have negligible sympathy for the bond holders and shareholders of companies like GM or the actual people who invested their capital and started a bank only to have the terms of their LAWFUL loans rewritten by the whims of the despotic dictator known as Barack Obama.

That is what this is about Brinker, no one gives a damn about the financial markets etc, because they are TOTALLY and absolutely MEANINGLESS if you cannot keep the Federal Government from seizing it. What is interesting is he peripherally acknowledges it happened but seems to ignore or simply does not grasp the significance.

I find it laughable that he sits their pontificating about security this and security that when the damnable Federal government, under the leader of the King of the Socialist, has demonstrably shown it can and will seize private property and alter private contracts.

There is no full faith and credit with this government, they have already demonstrated that there is none. The key is to get this socialist bastard out of office and drum out every single one of the people who supported his reign of terror. Get it through your heads folks your entire portfolios are at risk as long as the Government is allowed to seize private companies and liquidate them and contract law means nothing as long as Obama is in power.

tfb

Anonymous said...

Is this a forum for polictial right wing raning and raving?

Obama is doing the best he can and wll be reelected for

FOUR MORE YEARS!!!

Anonymous said...

Is this a forum for polictial right wing raning and raving?

When it is relevant to what Da Brink says - yes. And my rant is. He is ignoring the essential problem and balking about symptoms.


Obama is doing the best he can


Who cares what his best is. He has no relevant experience or ability and at his best he has the functional skill level of 12 year old. The kid selling lemonade down the street from me knows mroe about the economy and capitalism than Barack Obama. So Obama's best, as an economically illiterate, divisive partisan hack is irrelevant to his role as Chief Executive Officer.

He is in so far over his head he is making his country suffer by his arrogance of assuming he was ready to step into the role.

tfb

Anonymous said...

HN: I agree that the subject has been covered thoroughly during these third hour sessions. When people stop writing books, the interviews may stop, but until then my guess is, it is easy to book these people.

It is also a relatively easy interview to conduct because BB knows how things played out and simply has to ask questions that rehash the past.

Stay tuned to see if BB gets an interview with either author of Reckless Endangerment. This recent book has been mentioned a lot lately including a recent column by George Will. Apparently it pulls no punches at laying the blame at the feet of Fannie Mae and its onetime head, James Johnson. Maybe it is a little too political for BB or maybe they simply won't return his calls.

-- Frankj

birdbrain said...

Heard a caller during the first hour saying he subscribed to "your Fixed Income Advsor" to which Mr B uttered a quick thank you, without stating that supposedly his son is the publisher of said rag.

Side note to Honey: Sad to hear about Yoda. Two such episodes within a few months must be tough.
Mrs b and I have had three cats depart us over the years, but after a short grieving time we choose to re-adopt from the local shelter, as we find certain traits from our former friends are found in our new cat. This "nine lives" theory may have some merit.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
jeffchristie said...


I still can't believe Brinker is falling for this nonsense that if they don't raise the debt limit we are going to default on paying interest on bonds. Today about 40% of spending comes from borrowing money by issuing bonds. The other 60% comes from tax revenue. Once we hit the limit we won't be able to issue any new bonds but the tax revenue will still be flowing into the treasury. It is like a working couple and one of them loses their job. The family income is now down 40%. Does this mean they stop paying their mortgage and lose their home or do they cut back in other areas?

Pig said...

Anon says: "Unsubstantiated, name calling partisan hogwash. Four more years...get over it, pizzaboy


RIght out of HEr partisan mouth, sheer hogwash (actually more like Pigchit), with more unsubstantiated name calling.

I say........NOOPE.....YOU CAN'T MAKE THIS STUFF UP!

Anonymous said...

Americans can avoid the risk of outliving their assets by saving more, working longer, investing wisely, delaying Social Security and buying a life annuity, according the Government Accountability Office (GAO).

Got that? Just work longer, save more and forget about Social Security.

Oh, and don't forget to invest wisely.

Any more questions?

jeffchristie said...

In the last hour Bob took a call from Andy in Redwood city. That sounded familiar to me. A little research showed that Andy has racked up quite a few frequent flier miles here on the starship moneytalk.

December 19 2010

Caller Andy from Redwood City disagreed with Brinker that the tax cut extension will create jobs and he was for tariffs to protect union jobs. Brinker told him that he had recited all of the Democrat talking points very well and suggested that he contact Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont who spent 8 1/2 hours filibustering against the bill. Brinker also pointed out that "globalization had already happened and was here to stay."

March 13 2011

Andy called in from Redwood city. He said he didn't agree with Bob's position on nuclear power but he didn't want to go into it. Then he quoted some statistics on tax revenues and felt they justified increasing taxes. Bob didn't agree. He said that the problems caused by Sacramento were the result of run away spending and mismanagement. Andy went on to blame prop 13.

May 1 2011

Andy in Redwood city called in the last hour. He talked about an effort to reinstate the Glass-Steagal Act. He claimed that some democrats supported it but NO republicans did. According to the Huffington Post John McCain was one of the sponsors of the bill. I don't know if Andy is just ignorant on this or if he is a liar with a political agenda.

Anonymous said...

Looks as if Brinker spotted "Andy" early on for the political stooge he is....

"Brinker told him that he had recited all of the Democrat talking points...

It's not easy to pull something off on Brinker, that's for sure.

Honeybee said...

Kirk Lindstrom:

Highest Paid CEOS List 2010

.

jeffchristie said...

Anonymous said...
Looks as if Brinker spotted "Andy" early on for the political stooge he is....

"Brinker told him that he had recited all of the Democrat talking points...

It's not easy to pull something off on Brinker, that's for sure.

GREAT POINT. Andy couldn't fool Brinker but he has sure fooled the call screener. Brinker nailed him back on 19 Dec 2010 but he got past the screener on 13 Mar 2011, 1 May 2011 and yesterday 10 Jul 2011. If Brinker reads this Blog, as some of us think, yesterday just might be the last time he gets on the air.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Kirk Lindstrom said...

Brinker: "If the United States were to refuse to raise the debt ceiling -- remember, I don't believe that's an option and I don't expect that to happen -- then the credit quality of US Treasuries would be degraded....because of political posturing."

I believe one option to avoid default is to issue IOUs to ALL government Employees and use tax collections to service debt. We could do this for a very long time. Of course, nobody would get reelected as government employees are, unfortunately, a very large voting block.

You'd think someone with a national radio show would have mentioned this option.

Kirk Lindstrom said...

I should add, you would have to issue the "IOUs" in a very special way by saying they will ONLY be paid if the debt ceiling is raised. You would tell the employees they are working for free otherwise...

Another option is to furlough all nonessential government workers until there is a debt ceiling agreement. Tell the workers they are not going to be paid and will not get benefits until an agreement is reached. This would make them VERY ANGRY and push the politicians to reach an agreement.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Morons of The World Unite said...

"It's not an option but a cockamamie scheme by some armchair economist."

Actually, I believe it was used in Sacramento Kalifornia to keep paying their over paid public employees when they didn't have legal authority to pay salary via a budget.

Honeybee said...

HN asked: "how many times has BB covered "the fall of Lehman"? will he ever get over "the fall of Lehman"? there is something obsessive here."

That's the million dollar question. He truly seems hell-bent on hammering the subject ad infinitum.

Perhaps he is trying to convince himself that he had no way of seeing it coming and when he called bottoms throughout 2008, he was not a complete joke.

.

Honeybee said...

In addition to several OUTSTANDING points, TFB wrote: "There is no full faith and credit with this government, they have already demonstrated that there is none. The key is to get this socialist bastard out of office and drum out every single one of the people who supported his reign of terror. Get it through your heads folks your entire portfolios are at risk as long as the Government is allowed to seize private companies and liquidate them and contract law means nothing as long as Obama is in power."

TFB,

As I listened to Obama talking this morning, I heard a man who has a deeply held belief in the government's right to take whatever they want from whomever they want and do with it whatever they want.

He used the term "if you are progressive" several times. Progressive is a word that means Socialist/Marxist and possibly even Communist.

I agree with you that as long as he is in office, this country will continue to be systematically brought down. And everything we have is at risk.

.

Honeybee said...

It should be known that TFB has met Barack Obama personally....I believe on more than one occasion. So he may have a better perspective of the man than most.

.

Honeybee said...

Birdbrain said: "Side note to Honey: Sad to hear about Yoda. Two such episodes within a few months must be tough.
Mrs b and I have had three cats depart us over the years, but after a short grieving time we choose to re-adopt from the local shelter, as we find certain traits from our former friends are found in our new cat. This "nine lives" theory may have some merit."



Birdbrain,

Thank you so much for your kind comments.

What is breaking my heart now is that Lama (the last of the siblings from the same litter) is obviously missing his brother and sister. He cries a lot and "talks" to me almost like he is asking me where they are.

I'm spending more time holding him and carrying him around, but otherwise, I am helpless do comfort him.

.

Honeybee said...

Jeffchristie said: "I still can't believe Brinker is falling for this nonsense that if they don't raise the debt limit we are going to default on paying interest on bonds. Today about 40% of spending comes from borrowing money by issuing bonds. The other 60% comes from tax revenue. Once we hit the limit we won't be able to issue any new bonds but the tax revenue will still be flowing into the treasury."

Jeff,

GREAT points!

And Brinker keeps saying that it's almost certain that they will raise taxes on high income earners.

Yesterday, he said it would probably be for people earning as low as six-figure incomes.

So no doubt that will include both Bob Brinkers.

.

Honeybee said...

FrankJ said: "Stay tuned to see if BB gets an interview with either author of Reckless Endangerment."

I was just suuure that book would be the subject of the guest spot yesterday.

Maybe next week.... :)

.

Honeybee said...

Jeffchristie said: "In the last hour Bob took a call from Andy in Redwood city. That sounded familiar to me. A little research showed that Andy has racked up quite a few frequent flier miles here on the starship moneytalk."

Wowee-zowee! That Andy-guy does get around doesn't he? I wish he would find this blog and tell us his secret for getting tickets to ride the Starship or as someone once called it, the Spaceship-Moneytalk. :)

.

Honeybee said...

Kirk said: "I believe one option to avoid default is to issue IOUs to ALL government Employees and use tax collections to service debt. We could do this for a very long time. Of course, nobody would get reelected as government employees are, unfortunately, a very large voting block."

Kirk,

Sounds like a good plan, but as you said, government employees (at all levels) are a very large voting block, so it isn't likely to happen.

I have never known a government employee or a retired government employee, who didn't believe in voting to raise taxes on EVERY opportunity.

.

Anonymous said...

"Yesterday, he said it would probably be for people earning as low as six-figure incomes."

Oh no! All the way down to $999,000.00?

Anonymous said...

"I have never known a government employee or a retired government employee, who didn't believe in voting to raise taxes on EVERY opportunity."

You must not know many government employees!

The vast majority of government employees are honest, hard working ordinary people just trying to make a living like everybody else.

I have never met a SINGLE government employee and certainly not a SINGLE retiree who was in favor of higher taxes.

Anonymous said...

It should be known that TFB has

Whiter teeth, fresh breath, gorgeous eyes and strong arms that just wrap around a girl and make her feel all safe and secure. But then I am biased.

Proudly,

TFB's wench

Honeybee said...

TFB's wench,

Are you the same lucky female that TFB refers to as his "woman?" LOL!!!

.

Pig said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Pig said...

I have never met a SINGLE government employee and certainly not a SINGLE retiree who was in favor of higher taxes.

Have you ever met a married one?

Anonymous said...

Are you the same lucky female that TFB refers to as his "woman?" LOL!!!


Yes, I thought he called me his "Wench" though in public.

Honeybee said...

"Yes, I thought he called me his "Wench" though in public."

No, he reserves that for more private conversations... ROFLOL!!!

.

Anonymous said...

I can't believe my woman posted without asking my permission.

Sigh...this is what happens when they don't have enough chores to do.

tfb

Honeybee said...

Looks like I have a new friend. So nice to meet you, TFB's Wench. :)

.

Al in SJ said...

With all the posturing going on in Washington over the deficit limits....


**************************************

The Cannibal Restaurant

A cannibal was walking through the jungle
and came upon a restaurant operated by a
fellow cannibal.

Feeling somewhat hungry, he went in, sat down

And looked over the menu....

+Tourist: $5.00

+Broiled Missionary: $10..00

+Fried Explorer: $15..00


+Politicians: Democrat or Republican $100.00
Grilled or Baked


The cannibal called the waiter over and asked,
"Why such a high price for the Politicians?

Are they hard to catch?"

The cook replied, "Nah, They generally are bumbling

around and easy to catch. But have you ever tried to

clean one? They're so full of shit, it takes all morning

to clean them."

Anonymous said...

Annaly Capital Management Announces Pricing of Public Offering of Common Stock

NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Jul. 11, 2011-- Annaly Capital Management, Inc. (NYSE: NLY) today
announced the pricing of an underwritten public offering of 120,000,000 shares of its common stock at a price per share of $17.70 for expected gross proceeds of approximately $2.1 billion before expenses.

Annaly has also granted the underwriters a thirty-day option to purchase up to an additional 18,000,000 shares of common stock solely to cover overallotments.

Honeybee said...

It's probably a long-term good move for Annaly -- putting all that extra capital to work at bargain prices...

.

birdbrain said...

Nancy Pelosi, speaking yesterday against entitlement cuts:

"Do not consider Social Security a piggy bank for giving tax cuts to the wealthy."

Questions for the Minority Leader:

Since your start in Congress in 1987, you and your colleagues have annually borrowed (stolen) from the Social Security surplus to fund discretionary spending, a total of over two trillion dollars.
Is this practice not also using SS
as a piggy bank?

Wouldn't the program be self-sustaining for decades if you had not participated in this borrowing
(theft)?

When does Congress plan on repaying
Social Security for these "loans"?

Honeybee said...

Latest from Lakshmann Achuthan (ECRI):

Endurance is the Key

National Public Radio
July 12, 2011

(NPR) - "During the first three months of the year, the U.S. economy grew by just 1.9 percent while China grew 9.7 percent. Lakshman Achuthan of the Economic Cycle Research Institute says the weak U.S. growth rate is part of a disturbing pattern.

"Ever since the mid-1970s the pace of expansion has been stairstepping down in every expansion so that the last expansion was the weakest expansion on record on every count, including GDP and jobs," he says...

But none of this is forever. Achuthan says even with moderate growth the U.S. economy will recover eventually, if given enough time… "Two percent's not bad if you can get 10 years of it," he says. "It's really bad if you only get a couple years of it, and that's the challenge here."

But to achieve that kind of stable, long-term growth means avoiding any further recessions. And that won't be easy…"

Read more and Listen live

.

Honeybee said...

Al,

LOL! Yup, I'm surprised it's not even higher than $100. Most of them truly are "full of it." :)

.

Anonymous said...

"It's probably a long-term good move for Annaly -- putting all that extra capital to work at bargain prices..."

NLY sells stock all the time and that's why the upside potential is limited.

Bill Gross said:

"The stock can't go up much because the minute the price gets above book value the company issues stock, as it did in late December. This is a dividend-earning vehicle. You wouldn't look for Annaly to rise from 17.75 to 22.50 in 12 months. But it produces a 14.5% yield."

Honeybee said...

Let me see if I have this right:

1. Democrats have always claimed there is a Social Security trust fund.

2. Obama said today that Social Security checks may not go out in August if they don't get the debt ceiling raised because there will be no money "in the coffers."

Now surely the democrats haven't been lying to us all along about a SS trust fund? Have they????

.

Honeybee said...

Mark Hulbert announces a stock market timing system that has beat all other market-timers over the past 3 decades. That would have to include Bob Brinker's.

Hulbert wrote:

"It is the Seasonality Trading System, which was created by Norman Fosback in the early 1970s. Fosback was president of the Institute for Econometric Research from the early 1970s through the late 1990s, and he currently edits an investment advisory service called Fosback’s Fund Forecaster.

Obama pushes leaders in both parties to deliver the largest possible deficit-reduction deal. "If not now, when?" he asks.

Fosback introduced this timing system in the mid-1970s, calling it one of the best short-term indicators he had ever encountered. The system calls for being 100% in stocks at the turns of each calendar month and prior to exchange holidays. It is in cash at all other times.

Believe it or not, that’s it.

The Seasonality Timing System’s performance has been superb on a risk-adjusted basis. It is well ahead of any of the other market timing systems the Hulbert Financial Digest (HFD) has tracked over the last three decades.

(SNIP)

I know of no other market timing system that was created as many decades ago as this one that has been as successful in real time as this one. If you want to bet on past performance, this is definitely one to consider."

Marketwatch: Maybe the best market-timing system ever

Anonymous said...

BulbTimer e-blast:

BulbTimer recommends subscribers be 100% in incandescent bulbs, until the the government sez you can't buy them anymore in their present form.

First on the chopping block are the 100 watt bulbs, which will not be available after Dec 31 of this year.

In other news, Texas passed a bill repudiating the federal legislation of 2007. Texas will allow the sale of incandescent bulbs if manufactured within the state. The law is probably subject to federal lawsuit, so if you are pursuing Portfolio 7 which calls for building your own factory, you might want to think twice, or three times until the issue is settled.

In DC, the House Republicans did not garner enough votes today, to repeal the 2007 federal legislation which put the kibosh on traditional incandescent bulbs.

-- Frankj

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Honeybee said...

You can't make this stuff up....Unbelievably, the light bulb ban happened during the Bush Administration, now the Democrats strongly oppose doing away with it, even though the currently Republican House majority tried.

They failed because they shot themselves in the foot because it needed a 2/3 vote to repeal. You really can't make this stuff up.

Who is left to preserve American freedom with leaders like this on both sides?

"The legislation to repeal the ban on incandescent light bulbs failed in the House on Tuesday 233 -193. While a majority voted for the repeal of the Republican pushed legislation that would make Thomas Edison's invention okay to buy, sell, and own in the United States, nevertheless, the bill needed at least a 2/3 majority which it fell short of, since the vote happened under suspension.

House Democrats on Monday indicated strong opposition to a controversial bill to repeal federal lightbulb standards, which could lead to the defeat of the measure in an expected Tuesday vote.

The Better Use of Light Bulbs Act, H.R. 2417 would end federal bulb standards passed in 2007 that Republicans have since held up as a prime example of federal overreach. House Republicans brought up the bill under a suspension of the rules, which requires two-thirds of voting members to support it.

That means even though a majority might support it, it is unlikely to be approved Tuesday in light of Democratic opposition.

Some on the right are scratching their heads and wondering why the GOP would put themselves in this position, when a simple majority could pass the light bulb ban. My friend Ed Morrissey at Hot Air writes:

I’m not sure why the bill was introduced under a suspension of the rules. The GOP may have wanted to rush it to the floor, as they have been attracting some heat (pun intended) over their lack of energy (yes, I’m having fun) about overturning the 2007 law. The Hill doesn’t explain the strategy behind that decision, but the Christian Science Monitor reports that it could be added later as a rider to another bill.

Congressman Cliff Stearns, Florida Republican, a member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee may have the answer. I spoke with him earlier today about why the GOP decided to vote on the bulb bill under suspension and he answered:

"I think that most Republicans feel that we’re going to pass it under suspension with 2/3, but in order to that we need all the Republicans plus we’re going to need Democrats. And so the question is how many Republicans do we lose, and I haven’t done the whip, but I assume McCarthy has done the whip count and he’s got the votes or he would have brought it up."

Mr. Stearns also said that if the bill does not get a 2/3 majority today, the GOP will bring it back so it will only require a simple majority. So why not require a simply majority now? Rep. Stearns explained that the bill would have to go the Rules Committee at that point where it would be vulnerable to changes along the way before it even came to the floor. Under suspension, the bill is voted on as is, except a super-majority of 2/3 is needed to pass it.


Washington Times: Light bulb ban repeal bill fails in the House

.

Honeybee said...

"3 High Yield REITS to Buy on Dips"__by Hawkinvest:

We have seen a number of real estate investment trusts raise capital in the past few months. A new Forbes blog post listed Annaly Capital Management (NLY) and American Capital Agency Corp (AGNC) as likely candidates for a secondary offering.

The article states: "History has shown us that companies typically will raise capital when the stock price is at a double-digit premium to book value."

Just hours after the article came out, Annaly announced the sale of about 100 million shares.

Based on the frequent capital raises by some of these real estate investment trusts, it only make sense to invest, and to buy on dips when the capital raises are announced. Here are stocks to consider when they drop from capital raise announcements:

Annaly Capital Management, Inc., (NLY) is a mortgage REIT company, based in New York. Annaly pays a dividend of about $2.60 annually which is equivalent to a yield of around 14%.

Here are some key points for NLY:

Current share price: $17.90
The 52 week range is $16.73 to $18.79.
Earnings estimates for 2011: $2.53 per share
Earnings estimates for 2012: $2.38 per share


The dividend is paid out quarterly at just over 60 cents per share and the next payment should be sometime in September, 2011. These shares look like an attractive long term investment on any dips to $17.70 or less."


Read more at Seeking Alpha

Honey here: Right this minute, NLY is back up to $18.20. People trade this ETF and CLAIM to make money. I'm not so sure. I have successfully traded High Yield ETF and funds, but right now hold NLY for the dividends. I also own some ANH...

Anonymous said...

what a friend we have in Ben Bernanke

love this guy. want the market to move north . call on Ben to make a public comment.

is this guy great or what

Thrash Man

Anonymous said...

With the adding of the NLY SPO and it's 100mil new shares, how and when will those new shares ripple thru the overall financial stats like EPS ?

Is the press release of the SPO the same as the actual avail of the shares... or do they physically become avail at some future point in time ? Just comparing the SPO price of $17.70 vs the current price of $18.xx

ps56k

Honeybee said...

Don't worry, mostly the big boys got those shares at $17.70.

.

Anonymous said...

"Don't worry, mostly the big boys got those shares at $17.70."

I know that. But that doesn't answer my question.

Does anybody have an answer?

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
"Don't worry, mostly the big boys got those shares at $17.70."

I know that. But that doesn't answer my question.

Does anybody have an answer?

Libertypilgrim used to ask questions questions like that. No one seemed to have the answer. I suggest you go to the companies website and ask the folks at investor relations. Hope this helps.

A former 101er.

Anonymous said...

"We are selling to the underwriters the shares of common stock at a price of $17.47 per share, resulting in aggregate net proceeds to us of approximately $2.1 billion before expenses."

http://investor.annaly.com/doc.aspx?IID=...

Dan G said...

"Ben Bernanke...is this guy great or what"

Well, given the present state of the economy, I'm going to vote "or what".

- Dan

Pig said...

Anon says, Libertypilgrim used to ask questions ...

I vaguely remember that name. Wasn't he a good friend of Mark/butter? I remember that he imped me with a filthy take-off of LPS.

He was all spin and never used a spreadsheet for his phony calls.

Anonymous said...

"I vaguely remember that name. Wasn't he a good friend of Mark/butter? I remember that he imped me with a filthy take-off of LPS."

Was he the one that went after Kirk Lindstrom forever? Or was that you.

I know somebody apologized and promised to be good so it's probably not you.

jeffchristie said...

Honey

Watch it. Those democrats in California will tax anything.

By Craig Gustafson
4:35 p.m., July 11, 2011
Performance Audit of the Animal Services Agreement Between the City of San Diego and the County of San Diego. A proposal that would require cat owners in San Diego to vaccinate their feline companions for rabies and pay the city a one-time licensing fee — a plan critics have dubbed a “cat tax” — is on its way to the City Council for consideration.

City Councilman Carl DeMaio, a mayoral candidate who held a news conference Monday with his Bengal cat Ace, said there is no justification to levy a new tax on cat owners.

“This cat tax is not driven by a legitimate need but instead is a flawed attempt to generate revenue for the city in the middle of its budget crisis,” said DeMaio, a candidate for mayor next year. “We have more pressing issues to tackle than creating a cat tax. I urge the mayor and the City Council to send this flawed idea back to where it belongs — the litter box.”

Pig said...

I know somebody apologized and promised to be good so it's probably not you.

If it was me, I would likely remember, wouldn't I? I think you are getting senile....or worse.

You might be thinking of the guy called LibertyPimple. He wanted to get paid at Sweet Suite 101 for starting a thread named Bob Brinker is worse than Satan, or something dumb like that.

People laughed at him for weeks. I think he then decided to sell all his gold, and join Brinker in never ever mentioning it again.

He liked to brag about calling the stock market crash to the minute, but he was spinning and was off by several months, if I remember correctly.

Did you know him? He was a San Antonio Spurs fan...the only one in the entire world at the time.

I think he got fired from his job in Tcxas and moved to California on the public dole, but I'm only guessing.

birdbrain said...

http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/video/coins-costing-taxpayers-14076274

If Congress can't stop this waste,
what hope is there for significant
reform in govt spending?

Honeybee said...

Birdbrain,

Thanks for the link to the video about how another gross government waste:

US Mint: Dollar Coins costing taxpayers $600,000 A DAY, plus millions for storage, because nobody wants them

By law they have to continue making them until 2016.
.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

One of the tax breaks upon which President Obama has focused is a provision that allows hedge fund managers — who make billions annually — to receive a substantial tax break. This particular tax break, known as the carried-interest loophole, allows hedge fund managers to treat the money they receive from investors as capital gains, subject to a 15 percent tax rate. Though this money is a paycheck received for services, just like a movie star receiving a bonus if her movie does well, it’s treated as investment income.

Since hedge fund managers are some of the richest people in the country, this tax break actually causes a significant loss of revenue. In fact, according to calculation by RJ Eskow, closing this loophole would raise more than $4 billion per year just from the 25 richest hedge fund managers:


The top 25 hedge fund managers in the United States collectively earned $22 billion last year, and yet they have their own cushy set of tax rules. If they operated under the same rules that apply to other people — police officers, for example, or teachers — the country could cut its national deficit by as much as $44 billion in the next ten years.

Honeybee said...

FYI:

I sold all my NLY holdings because of what is brewing over the national debt. I'd rather be cautious than sorry.

I will still qualify for the dividends on July 28th because I held the shares from before the ex-dividend date.

.

Anonymous said...

"I sold all my NLY holdings because of what is brewing over the national debt. I'd rather be cautious than sorry."

If you are concerned about "what is brewing over the national debt" then why would you be in the market at all?

The consensus seems to be that both the stock and the bond market will tank big time if there is an actual default.

I'm not buying it so I am.

Stillholding

Anonymous said...

Stocks discussed on the Lightning Round session of Jim Cramer's Mad Money TV Program, Thursday July 14.


Solar Capital (SLRC), Annaly Capital (NLY): "The blood lines of Solar Capital are so strong, I'm gonig to tell you it is a buy, buy, buy.

We have Mike Farrell in Annaly. He just did a big fundraising, and if we don't get in before, we'll get in after. Those are the winners."

Anonymous said...

Get these stocks into your retirement account

So what's the best IRA investment? Stocks that produce high amounts of income that would be taxed at relatively high rates outside an IRA make great bets for a retirement account.

Let's take a closer look at three categories of investments that fit better in an IRA than elsewhere.

1. Real estate investment trusts
The best example of an investment that takes maximum advantage of an IRA is the high-yield REIT. Mortgage REITs ARMOUR Residential (NYSE: ARR ) , Annaly Capital (NYSE: NLY ) , and Invesco Mortgage Capital (NYSE: IVR ) all have dividend yields of more than 14%. Moreover, although gains on the sale of shares in a taxable account can qualify for lower long-term capital-gains tax rates, their huge dividends usually get taxed at ordinary income rates.

Of course, mortgage REITs aren't without risks. They're highly leveraged and sensitive to interest rates. But if you think rates will stay low for the foreseeable future, thanks to a sluggish economy, then the healthy income they provide could well be worth the risk.

Honeybee said...

I agree with you about mortgage REITS and will be buying NLY again as soon as something shakes loose on the debt ceiling debate.

I am just playing it safe for awhile.

.