Thursday, June 16, 2011

June 17, 2011, Bob Brinker's Individual Issues Stock Picks

Posted June 17, 2011.............................................. (Post or Read Comments)

Bob Brinker's short list of individual stock picks goes back over 23 years with very little change.  The two oldest stocks on this list of off-the-books picks  are Microsoft and Vodafone.  The two latest additions are Suncor and GLD (gold ETF). Both were added in May 2009. 

Let's review how well those who have followed Bob Brinker's  advice on Microsoft have done.

I do not know Brinker's  original buy price for Microsoft.  I am told by some that they  remember one of Brinker's appearances on  Nightly Business Report in 1998 when Kirk Lindstrom called in and asked Brinker a question about his Microsoft pick.  (I cannot find documentation of that call.)

June 17th, IN EDIT: Good news! The resident Bob Brinker Super-Sleuth, Jeffchristie,  sent the location of this transcript.

Guest Appearance - The Nightly Business Report, July 23, 1999

KANGAS: My guest market monitor this week is Bob Brinker, editor of "Bob Brinker's Marketimer" letter, and Bob of course is also the popular host of ABC radio's weekend program "Money Talk." Welcome back, Bob. 

BOB BRINKER, EDITOR, "BOB BRINKER'S MARKETIMER": Thanks, Paul. Great to be here.
KANGAS: You know, you have been one of the most unwavering bulls of this entire decade as far as your market letter is concerned, but am I noticing a little addition of a more a cautionary tone to your recent letters? 

BRINKER: Well, Paul, it's been a tremendous run, as you know, for nine years. We're up about 400 percent in the major indexes since 1990, and valuations have skyrocketed. We're up around 27, 28 times S&P earnings for 1999. This has been the "mother of all bull markets." 

KANGAS: So, overvaluation is a problem with you? 

BRINKER: Valuation is something we have a great deal of respect for. There are a number of factors we're looking at right now, the Federal Reserve, in our view, has been tightening monetary policy in recent months. There is a possibility we could be looking at a synchronized global economic recovery going forward. That could give rise to inflation concerns at the Federal Reserve. They're already preoccupied at the Fed, as you know, about the very tight labor markets. So, we're watching that. Obviously, interest rates have backed up in the last nine months, and investor complacency is amazing today. It seems as though many investors think 20, 30 percent a year is a national birth right. 

KANGAS: So, what do you see ahead now, Bob? 

BRINKER: We're watching all of these factors very carefully, and we're not making a change at this point. But if we have to change our investment policy, we will change it. 

KANGAS: Well, we've gotten to 11,200 on the Dow, and do you see maybe that's about it for a while? 

BRINKER: Well, I think that the 11,000s could be real difficult to climb through. I think there's a lot of stock for sale in the 11,000s. 

KANGAS: All right. Now, in tonight's "ask the market monitor" segment for our viewers, Kirk Lindstrom of Los Altos, California, who watches us on KQED, asks, "why have you had Microsoft as a 'hold' for so may years in your newsletter rather that a 'buy on pullbacks?'" You recommended (msft) on this program in the early 90's. 

BRINKER: Well, we certainly should thank the viewer for reminding us of Microsoft. You're right, Paul. Right here on the NIGHTLY BUSINESS REPORT, also in "Marketimer" we initially recommended purchase of Microsoft in 1990 at a split adjusted $2 a share. And in the newsletter we called it the technology stock for the 90's. Now we're up over 4,500 percent on that recommendation. 

KANGAS: So, are you taking money off the table now, Bob? 

BRINKER: Well, we're holding the stock. We did maintain, to answer the viewer, we did maintain "buy" points for several years. But now we're at 60 times next year's earnings on Microsoft, so we're going to stay with a "hold" for now. That's a rich stock."
[See the comments section for the remainder of this Kangas/Brinker transcript.]
Honey here: Now that we know Brinker's original buy price and know for certain he never sold the stock to take his sizable profits, let's just go back five years to when we have proof that Brinker issued a new buy price on Microsoft, and see if history repeated itself:
April 5, 2003, Marketimer, Bob Brinker said: "On March 11, we upgraded Microsoft to "buy" at a price of $23, and we upgraded Vodafone to "buy" at a price of $17 on that date."
So how has Microsoft done for those subscribers who bought five years ago at $23 and held it ever since on Brinker's recommendation? Let's check it out:

*  Firstly, there have been no Microsoft stock splits in the last five years (the last split was in February 2003).

*Microsoft has been as high as  $37 in 2008 (what a great time that would have been to sell). It then dropped to $15 in March 2009.  So in one year investors lost  nearly 70% of their money.

* Today, it closed at $24.  So after  a roller coaster ride up and then down, the NAV is currently up ONE DOLLAR  since Brinker upgraded it to "buy" in 2003.  

* Right now, Microsoft  is currently  paying a moderate dividend of 2.60%, so basically the only value added in the past five years was the  dividends received. 

* Why does Brinker, a "market-timer,"  continue to hold this stock?  Perhaps he simply doesn't care what it does because he never has to report on this list of  stock picks unless they make him look good.   And none of them are included in his official performance record or reported on by Mark Hulbert of Hulberts Financial Digest.

Jim nailed it couple of years ago when he wrote:

Jim said......
I think Brinker said many times that an investor should not fall in love with a stock. Too bad he fell in love with Microsoft.
January 23, 2009 9:50 PM

As for Brinker's other picks, it looks like Vodafone may have done  slightly better than Microsoft and right now is paying a 7% dividend. Suncor is up from Brinker's latest buy price of  $33, but has taken a hit recently with the drop in oil prices.

The gold ETF (GLD) is up from the price it was in May 2009 when Brinker added it to the list of picks, but Brinker has never indicated a buy price on it.

Brinker has always said that  "individual stock holdings should be limited to 4% of equities in order to manage stock risk,"  but he has never said  whether or not  this  rule  applies to GLD even though it is an ETF.

Matter of fact, Brinker has never given any reason why he added GLD to Marketimer, but it might have something to do with having bragging rights, as he has often done on Moneytalk since gold has done well the last couple of years.   At the same time,  he has the option of saying nothing if it doesn't do well.  That's what's called being in the "Cat Bird Seat."  :)

Microsoft,  five years:

15 comments:

Geane452 said...

"Matter of fact, Brinker has never given any reason why he added GLD to Marketimer, but it might have something to do with having bragging rights, as he has often done on Moneytalk since gold has done well the last couple of years. At the same time, he has the option of saying nothing if it doesn't do well. That's what's called being in the "Cat Bird Seat."

Bingo, I don't even know why Brinker has ANY of those stock picks in his newsletter.

Nobody ever pays any attention to them and he never mentions them as far as I know.

I think they are just so much fluff filler stuff to fill up his rag.

And BTW I think I heard him years ago that he held MSFT with a per share cost of 4 bucks or something like that.

All useless filler IMO.

Honeybee said...

Good morning, Doubledip,

There are a lot of things that Bob Brinker has in his investment letter that, in my opinion, are simply filler.

Page after page of "recommended mutual funds" that almost never change. A few minutes of online research for low-cost funds at big name houses and you have your own list for free.

As for the commentary that usually takes up the first three pages, most of it is simply taken off the internet (leading indicators, jobs, payroll, productivity, CPI, inflation, housing, Fed, etc.).

They rearrange the words a bit and it's call "Stock Market Timing Update." It's comical.

But not too much talk about his timing model these days. LOL!

.

Honeybee said...

Doubledip,

In edit, I posted what Bob Brinker said on NBR about Microsoft back in 1999 in the summary.

.

birdbrain said...

Good to see again the 1999 NBR interview. When Mr B said we've been in the "mother of all bull markets" I was reminded when he would say to have cash reserves for an upcoming "mother of all buying opportunities."

Those unfortunates who acted on his last buy, for over the last three years, have participated in the "mother of all I will be eternally grateful to simply get back to even" markets.

Act now. That last paragraph will be trademarked within a week.

Honeybee said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Honeybee said...

Birdbrain said: "I was reminded when he would say to have cash reserves for an upcoming "mother of all buying opportunities."

Those unfortunates who acted on his last buy, for over the last three years, have participated in the "mother of all I will be eternally grateful to simply get back to even" markets.

Act now. That last paragraph will be trademarked within a week."


Birdbrain,

Yes, I remember that era of "MOABO"....LOL! Funny how it seemed to just disappear into cyberspace. I don't recall Brinker ever actually saying it arrived. Do you?

I think the closest he came was with his "gift-horse buying opportunities." He actually called S&P Index mid-1400s a gift-horse buying opportunity shortly before it started descending to 677. Can't make this stuff up.

So if you copyright "mother of all I will be eternally grateful just to get back to even," will you grant me exclusive rights to use it on this blog only? I would be willing to negotiate a fair commission. :)

.

Geane452 said...

"We're in a bottoming process."

General: A classic way to describe a stock or market that has fallen a lot and might do anything from here.

Alternates: "Forming a base." "Bumping along the bottom."

When to use it: Any time you don't know what a stock will do but want to imply that it might eventually go up but hedge yourself by saying that it also might go down.

Why it's smart-sounding: It sounds highly informed. The stock is "in a bottoming process." It's "forming a base." It sounds reassuring, without being too precise. Sure, the stock might drop some more, you seem to be saying, but it's generally settling in here--and then it will eventually go up. It sounds like you have command of "technical analysis," which almost always sounds smart (and is almost always meaningless).

Why it's meaningless: Because it describes a price pattern that has happened but does not tell you anything about what will happen. A drop followed by a sideways move does not mean the stock won't drop more. It also does not mean the stock will go up. And it commits to no time frame. It can be used to describe any stock that has moved sideways for a while, without offering the slightest insight into the future.

Geane452 said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said...

Doubledip: that was good.

The Morgenson book, Reckless Endangerment: was mentioned a lot by Rush Limbaugh, this past week. Maybe sooner or later BB will have and interview.

Maybe it was an act, but Limbaugh seemed incredulous about some of the stuff in the book -- like he never realized the involvement of Fannie/Freddie.

On his program he transitions in and out of advertisements, or, I should say, he weaves the advertisement into the program content very skillfully. So maybe he was actually advertising the book.

-- Frankj

Geane452 said...

"The easy money has been made"

When to use it: When you are asked whether investors should buy a market or stock that has already gone up a lot.

Why it's smart-sounding: It implies wise, prudent caution. It implies that you bought or recommended the stock a long time ago, before the easy money was made (and are therefore smart). It suggests that there might be further upside but that there might also be future downside, because the stock is "due for a correction" (another smart-sounding meaningless phrase that you can use all the time). It does not commit you to any specific recommendation or prediction. It protects you from all possible outcomes: If the stock drops, you can say "as I said..." If the stock goes up, you can say "as I said..."

Why it's meaningless: It's a statement of the obvious. It's a description of what has happened, not what will happen. It requires no special insights or powers of analysis. It tells you nothing that you don't already know. Also, it's not true: The money that has been made was likely in no way "easy." Buying stocks that are rising steadily is a lot "easier" than buying stocks that the market has abandoned for dead (because everyone thinks you're stupid t

Honeybee said...

Uh, Doubledip....it would sure be nice (and HONEST) if you didn't just lift stuff and post it here without giving credit to the author, even it if is interesting.

There are 16 items on that list. I actually meant to post the one about "buy on weakness" this morning but had to hit Highway 17 for an appointment in San Jose.

Bob Brinker uses the useless "buy on weakness" ruse frequently. MOF, he used it in the June Marketimer.

He wrote: ".....we currently prefer a dollar-cost-averaging approach for new equity investments, especially during periods of SHORT-TERM WEAKNESS."
(emphasis mine)

From Business Insider:

"Buy on weakness"

When to use it: Any time you don't actually have the balls to say "buy" but want to be able to say later that you told everyone to buy if the stock should happen to go up.

Why it's smart-sounding: It sounds highly informed. It sounds prudent (don't be stupid and chase the stock here). It sounds like common sense. It allows you to take credit for predicting any bullish move in the stock, while also being able to say "I said buy on weakness" if it crashes. It hedges all future outcomes.

Why it's meaningless: It's too vague to be interesting or helpful. It can be applied to almost any stock or market at almost any time. It reveals that the speaker has little or no conviction about what he or she is saying and just wants to have it both ways.


Read more: 16 Meaningless Market Phrases That Make You Sound Smart on CNBC


.

birdbrain said...

Honey:

No trademark restrictions for you.

Thank you for the 16 Meaningless Market Phrases That Make You Sound Smart On Moneytalk.

Geane452 said...

"Uh, Doubledip....it would sure be nice (and HONEST) if you didn't just lift stuff and post it here without giving credit to the author, even it if is interesting."

Oh darn HB, now you've spoiled it. I was going to provide one of those little gems daily and now you've gone and given away the whole bunch all at once. Oh well.

Here's another favorite. You hear/read these little useless gems from all the talking heads or newsletters writers.

"There's lots of cash on the sidelines"


General: A classic way to suggest that the market will eventually go up.

Alternates: "Dry powder."

When to use it: Any time you need to explain a bullish outlook.

Why it's smart-sounding: It sounds like common sense: Wimpy investors are hoarding cash instead of "putting it into the market." When these investors finally grow a pair and use their cash to buy stocks, the market will go up.

Why it's meaningless: There is no such thing as cash "going into the market" or "coming out of the market." In every trade--every one--a seller sells stock to a buyer in exchange for cash. Importantly, the cash used to buy the stock does not go "into the market." It goes to the seller. After the trade, the seller now has cash instead of the stock, and the buyer now has the stock instead of cash--and the overall amount of neither cash nor stock has changed. At some times, some investors--mutual funds, for example--might have more cash than usual in their funds (for a variety of reasons), and this cash might eventually be used to buy stocks, but this cash will not go "into the market." It will go to the investors who own the stocks that the mutual funds buy. In short, again, cash does not go "into" and "out of" the market. Someone always holds the cash, and someone always holds the stocks. So, in a literal sense, the cash is always "on the sidelines."

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/meaningless-phrases-that-sound-smart-on-cnbc-2011-6?op=1#ixzz1PjZttSKl

Honeybee said...

Tom Lydon, my favorite financial "reporter," writes about some new leveraged ETFs on Seeking Alpha. Here are some excerpts, but if you are interested in the topic, I recommend reading all of his article:

"Direxion has introduced four new 300% leveraged exchange traded funds that boost its sector lineup, and let investors take bullish and bearish positions on healthcare and basic materials. The asset manager has also listed an ETF that bets against the total U.S. stock market."

Direxion Launches Leveraged ETFs for Healthcare, Materials

.

Honeybee said...

Birdbrain,

Since you voiced an interest, here is the remainder of Bob Brinker's interview on NBR in 1999. The editorial comments are by Kirk Lindstrom:


KANGAS: So, are you taking money off the table now, Bob?

BRINKER: Well, we're holding the stock. We did maintain, to answer the viewer, we did maintain "buy" points for several years. But now we're at 60 times next year's earnings on Microsoft, so we're going to stay with a "hold" for now. That's a rich stock.

[7/23/99 MSFT=45; 12/20/00 MSFT=20.75!!!
As of 5/16/05 MSFT remains a HOLD in Bob Brinker's Marketimer.]

KANGAS: OK. The next question from Jackson Mississippi, Eric Ritter , who watches us on WMPN asks, "why don't you recommend more individual stocks in your 'Marketimer' newsletter?'"

BRINKER: Really the "Marketimer" newsletter's focus is twofold, to be on the right side of the major trends in the market; that's key obviously. And also to pick mutual funds that you can invest in over time to build your wealth. And that's why we publish the recommended list and the model portfolios.

KANGAS: Bob, one of your "buy" recommendations on your last visit with us was Stanford Telecom (STII) at 22. It's now up around 27. Buy more, sell it or hold it?

BRINKER: I would take profits of Stanford Telecom. They are the target of a takeover offer from Newbridge Networks (NN), the Canadian company. I think that this tremendous run-up in the stock in the last few months is a profit-taking opportunity in Stanford Telecom.

KANGAS: We just have a minute left. You also said at that time to by Ultratech Stepper (UTEK) at 29. Now, it's down to about 15. What do you do with that?

BRINKER: Ultratech's been through a difficult period. They have strong financials, close to $10 in tangible book value, mostly in cash. A new product effort under way, and they have a new technology, bump processing for advanced semiconductor manufacture. This is an important technology going forward for high performance low cost chips. So we have a "hold" on that stock.

[UTEK Prices: 7/23/99 UTEK=14.875, 1/11/00 UTEK=$15.19 ]

KANGAS: Bob, it's come to my attention that employees at Ultratech have the option to invest their 401 (k) funds with a management firm in which you are a principal.

BRINKER: Exactly.

KANGAS: So, my question is does your firm recommend individual stocks?

BRINKER: Absolutely not. The BJ Group exclusively invests in no-load mutual funds.

KANGAS: All right. So, you see no conflict there?

BRINKER: Absolutely not.

KANGAS: All right, 15 seconds. Any new recommendations Robert?

BRINKER: I would say stay very, very close to the stock market indicators here. Don't become complacent. Don't listen to this business of the market skyrocketing.

[EC: Lets see what "the market" did in the next year]

[EC: It looks like the S&P500 went up about 10% and the NASDAQ went up 90% in the year following that pronouncement by Brinker.]

KANGAS: Bob, thanks very much for being with us.

BRINKER: Thanks, Paul.

KANGAS: My guest Bob Brinker of "Bob Brinker's Marketimer" letter.

This transcript is archived at Kirk Lindstrom's Bob Brinker Fan Club site

.