David Korn, who writes a weekly newsletter that includes summaries of Moneyalk, summarized Barbara's important points. Posted with David's permission:
1. The deadline is not April 15th, but rather April 17th this year. That’s the deadline to file or request an extension.
2. You can get an automatic 6 month extension without giving a reason — just for asking. You still have to pay as much as you owe to avoid interest and penalties.
3. Don’t look for some of the provisions that were available on 2010 such as the making work pay credit the credit for buying a hybrid vehicle or the first time home buyer credit for most purchasers. Those expired.
4. There are some new forms – Form 8949 to report sales of capital assets such as if you sold stock or mutual fund shares. That form is summarized and carried over to schedule D. There is also 8938 which tells the IRS that you have certain foreign assets.
5. There has been a major tightening up of the scrutiny of capital gains of the IRS.
6. Brokerage firms starting in 2011 were required to report the basis of stocks that were bought and sold and starting in 2012 the basis for mutual fund shares will be reported. This way people can not just make up the basis as the IRS suspects many have in the past.
7. Common mistakes by people who do their own tax forms include: (1) putting in the wrong social security number; (2) failing to report the income that gets reported to them on the 1099 forms. The IRS cross-checks the income that has been reported to them on 1099 against taxpayer returns.
8. If you use a tax preparer to do your tax forms, they now have to file electronically. Now 80% of taxpayers file electronically.
9. The tax code has got more and more complicated. Barbara said this is the 75th year of their publication and each year it gets bigger due to the changes in the law.
10. Barbara said at the end of 2011 more than 50 tax breaks expired and there hasn’t been any action on extending them so we don’t even know if some of those will apply this year such as the higher exemption amounts of the alternative minimum tax. We also don’t know what will happen at the end of 2012 relative to the Bush tax cuts.
11. Starting 2013, individuals with income over $200,000 or couples making over $250,000 will have additional Medicare taxes if the health care law is not declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.Here are some more tax changes in 2012: Palisades Hudson Financial Group
And here is a link to the J.K. Lasser web site which has good tax information and all the books published by J.K. Lasser http://www.jklasser.com/http://www.jklasser.com
David Korn's Stock Market Commentary, Interpretation of Moneytalk (Bob Brinker Host), Financial Education, Helpful Links, Guest Editorials, and Special Alert E-Mail Service. Copyright David Korn, L.L.C. 2012Honey here: If you are interested in getting complimentary issues of David Korn's weekly newsletter, and The Retirement Advisor, published by David and Kirk Lindstrom, go here (Look for David's link in the right hand column under "Related Links.") Please see my summary of the first two hours of the show below.
22 comments:
Mark Hulbert has an entire article today on Bob Brinker's Junior's newsletter. It's very informative and has some good suggestions.
Are you just going to publish Korn and Kirk's plug and ignore what is really happening today?
It's easy to see which side you are on.
I've been to the desert and saw you are still allowed to post here with no name.
Why are you so jealous of David, Kirk and ECRI that you stalk the websites that admire their work and harass them non stop?
Kirk posted on the Marketwatch comments you referenced the following info:
According to my copy of the 2009 Hulbert Financial Digest summary of 2008 results
Brinker's fixed income advisor model portfolio #1 lost 21.7% in 2008.
Brinker's fixed income advisor model portfolio #2 lost 11.5% in 2008.
Brinker's fixed income advisor model portfolio #3 lost 5.2% in 2008.
The Retirement Advisors are not afraid to post their numbers HERE.
Why can't I find that data on Brinker's own site?
What are you afraid of? Why not use your real name to post here?
Mark Hulbert has an entire article today on Bob Brinker's Junior's newsletter. It's very informative and has some good suggestions.
Pardon me for aksing, but who the hell cares?
It's easy to see which side you are on.
Get your empty head out of the clouds and tell us which side you are on...............
GEESH whatta nitwit.....................NOONE can make this crap up...............NOONE..............
This says Brinker is in first place among 200 advisers tracked by Hulbert. I don't see anything for Korn or Kirk.
"Robert Brinker, editor of Brinker’s Fixed Income Advisor, therefore thinks the spread will narrow even more in coming months. Brinker’s service is in first place for risk-adjusted performance over the last five years among the nearly 200 advisers tracked by the Hulbert Financial Digest.
Brinker’s preferred vehicle for investing in junk bonds is Vanguard’s High-Yield Corporate Fund VWEHX +0.17% , which Morningstar reports to have a current yield of 6.83%. In fact, the fund is tied for most popular among all mutual funds in a ranking of the most recommended funds among advisers who’ve beaten the market over the last decade."
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/low-risk-way-to-capture-junks-yields-2012-04-03?link=home_carousel
Mark Hulbert has ZERO credibility.
tfb
"Mark Hulbert has ZERO credibility....tfb"
I think Mark Hulbert is widely followed and writes a regular column that I enjoy reading.
And who are you again, if you don't mind my asking? Why should I listen to you?
I think Mark Hulbert is widely followed and writes a regular column that I enjoy reading.
So,many people also follow idiots and liars. Brinker has subscribers and the majority of people voted for Obama. Do you really want to try and prop up your rhetoric with the "many people do it" argument.
And some people would say a person who is not trying to sell you something has a far more credibility.
As for enjoyment, I enjoy listening to Brinker while I work in my garden. That has nothing to do with the fact he is disingenuous charlatan foisting hocus pocus on the naive.
tfb
I can't understand how anybody gets enjoyment from listening to a "disingenuous charlatan foisting hocus pocus on the naive."
I believe that says more about you than it does about Brinker.
But if you ever get to be rich, famous and widely followed then I will be sure to pay no attention to what you say.
Thank you.
The troll know as AC writes:
I can't understand...
Yes, I concur. It is probably that way for you on most topics of life. Maybe you should subscribe to more newsletters.
tfb
"Please note: In late 2000, Brinker forecasted a several-month bear market rally and recommended an investment in the NASDAQ 100 Index, a trade that turned out quite unprofitably. However, because Brinker at the time of making this forecast chose not to make this trade part of his model portfolios (Not true. See note 1), his HFD record has not suffered as a result."
__ Mark Hulbert on Pg 16 of the January 2012 issue of "The Hulbert Financial Digest - Long Term Performance Ratings" under Footnote 10:
Note 1: Brinker did not tell his subscribers this advice was "official" until weeks after the rally failed to materialize. Hulbert even admitted he bought QQQ for his portfolios then sold them for a loss when they didn't show up in Brinker's model portfolios while Brinker was saying to buy more in his newsletters as the fell from the $80s. (See "Bugging Bob Brinker" for proof.)
The guy doesn't even lie well. Why trust him when his own paper trail is full of errors and complaints?
Two points:
Hulbert failed to acknowledge that Robert is not Bob, since Bob is on his "honor roll." More deception from the newsletter community.
Poster @ 9:54 am today:
Thought of the late comedian Sam Kinison's
take about America's song Horse With No Name
"You're in the middle of the desert with nothing else to do. Name the damn horse."
"Please note: In late 2000, Brinker forecasted a several-month bear market rally and recommended an investment in the NASDAQ 100 Index, a trade that turned out quite unprofitably. However, because Brinker at the time of making this forecast chose not to make this trade part of his model portfolios (Not true. See note 1), his HFD record has not suffered as a result."
__ Mark Hulbert on Pg 16 of the January 2012 issue of "The Hulbert Financial Digest - Long Term Performance Ratings" under Footnote 10:
Note 1: Brinker did not tell his subscribers this advice was "official" until weeks after the rally failed to materialize. Hulbert even admitted he bought QQQ for his portfolios then sold them for a loss when they didn't show up in Brinker's model portfolios while Brinker was saying to buy more in his newsletters as the fell from the $80s. (See "Bugging Bob Brinker" for proof.)
Yeah that Hulbert guy is certainly a bastion of credibility.
tfb
Maybe this interesting article by Hulbert will change TFB's mind since TFB is not a fan of "market timing".
I will try to post it in hyperlink form, but no guarantees. If it doesn't work, maybe HB can re-do it.
HULBERT
Dan G, you lost me.
You might recall I am very strongly in favor of asset allocation strategies which are a defacto type of market timing.
I also believe technical analysis MAY be very useful when making an initial purchase in a singular security. However that is a subject of much current debate and it is hard to get proper metrics. However so fr the data seems to show that no harm is down by using technical analysis to find an INITIAL entry point for a lump sum purchase.
However it is radically different than the hocus-pocus Tom foolery witchcraft BS that Brinker alleges to practice. His own record demonstrates he is a dismal failure. And every proper academic study I have seen on market timing, outside of asset allocation with rebalance, indicates it cannot be substantiated.
I'll elaborate a bit more, and this ties back to other comments I have made.
You have to question the foundational premise many investors operate under. And the question to ask is, is the stock market as a whole truly a proper mechanism for generating wealth or is more appropriate for preserving wealth?
Kindest regards,
tfb
TFB,
I guess re-balancing can be considered a form of market timing, but I'm pretty sure when most folks talk about it, they mean trying to time the market using TA.
In any case, that's what I do...and fairly successfully for the last 40 years or more, I might add. (Don't tell the academics, though!)
No, I don't win 'em all, but I do avoid large losses, and that is what I believe is the key to any trading program. As you surely know, a 50% loss requires a 100% gain to just break even.
If I wasn't a market timer, I'd be an asset allocator/re-balancer, as that surely does work. If market timing ever stops working for me, that is what I will do.
I do believe in anyone doing what works for them and would never try to convince anyone to do things MY way.
"No, I don't win 'em all, but I do avoid large losses, and that is what I believe is the key to any trading program."
Thanks Dan, that's exactly what Brinker says. You can't win'em all but if you manage to sidestep just a bear market or two you are ahead of the game.
I guess tfb will say you are just lucky...but you have been lucky for 40 years now. LOL.
It is refreshing to listen to a successful marketimer without having to take all the insults and nasty comments.
It is refreshing to listen to a successful marketimer without having to take all the insults and nasty comments.
That is because Dan is not:
1) Actually trying to convince other people to use his system
2) Charging people for his system
3) Misleading, and deliberately deceiving people s to the effectiveness of his system.
Brinker does all of the above. When Dan starts hawking a bullshit system and deliberately misleads people then I will intervene. Until then, Dan is gentlemen to be accorded respect who just happens to dabble in the stock market as a hobby. God bless him and I enjoy his insights. On the other hand, IMO, Brinker is a disingenuous scum bag who deliberately deceives people and deserves scorn. Simple as that.
Brinker does not deserve people's respect because he is not being upfront with them.
I would be softer on Brinker and simply measure his performance if he was upfront with people. But he is not.
tfb
Bob's right on there. No one can "win 'em all". Or should I say as a certain Pig says here, NOONE!
Where Bob and I differ is that he is content to let trading losses run...and run...and run! No trader can last long with that approach. And Bob found that out with his cotra-trend "trade" in QQQ.
I took the QQQ trade myself, but was out with a 2-3% loss, and I lived to trade another day. Those who followed Bob's advice to the letter lived to regret it.
I've always believed in keeping trading positions apart from investments. They just can't be treated the same...not successfully anyway. ESPECIALLY in a trade against the MAJOR trend, as the QQQ trade was...going long in a bear market. The odds were against it from the start!
ACuz said..."This says Brinker is in first place among 200 advisers tracked by Hulbert. I don't see anything for Korn or Kirk."
The fact that Hulbert Financial Digest started covering the Brinker Fixed Income Advisor immediately after it was published is all the proof that you need to know to realize that the name carries some big weight with Mark Hulbert.
Kirk Lindstrom and David Korn's Retirement Advisor has a better performance record and is far superior in every way to Jr's. The only difference is neither of them have a daddy named Bob Brinker.
Please read my article about this subject for a real eye-opener.
TFB said: "As for enjoyment, I enjoy listening to Brinker while I work in my garden. That has nothing to do with the fact he is disingenuous charlatan foisting hocus pocus on the naive."
Right Fluffy...I agree....As I put in the title of this blog. Bob Brinker adds a lot of entertainment value for our listening enjoyment. I am a fan of that aspect of Moneytalk.
Maybe I should rename the blog: Honey's Bob Brinker Entertainment Fan Club. :)
I have a good friend whom I review the high points of the program with (on the phone) immediately after it ends and before I begin writing my summaries.
We have a lot of fun comparing notes on how many times Bob was a "disingenuous charlatan foisting hocus pocus on the naive."
And we laugh when he delivers special messages to me and blog-posters. :)
TFB said: "Dan is gentlemen to be accorded respect who just happens to dabble in the stock market as a hobby. God bless him and I enjoy his insights. On the other hand, IMO, Brinker is a disingenuous scum bag who deliberately deceives people and deserves scorn. Simple as that.
Brinker does not deserve people's respect because he is not being upfront with them.
I would be softer on Brinker and simply measure his performance if he was upfront with people. But he is not."
Bingo Fluffy....Perfectly stated on all counts!!!!!
We all appreciate Dan's sharing his technical analysis with us, but he makes it clear he is not offering advice, he is just sharing -- like I sometimes do.
When I read the April issue of Marketimer, it became clear to me once again that there is no level that Bob Brinker will not sink to deceiving his subscribers, as he does his listeners.
TFB said: "Dan is gentlemen to be accorded respect who just happens to dabble in the stock market as a hobby. God bless him and I enjoy his insights.
I agree 101%.
NOONE can argue with those facts, unless he has an agenda, or is STOOPID beyond salvation.
Post a Comment