Bob Brinker never mentioned the stock market today, and no caller was put on the air to ask about it. The S&P 500 Index closed Friday at 1131 -- very close to 1129 again -- where it was when Brinker issued a special Marketimer online bulletin on September 22nd.
There have now been five straight months of losses for the stock market. Last week the Dow dropped 6% and the S&P dropped 7.2%. The S&P declined 14.3% for the quarter -- its worst quarter in 2 years! The S&P closed out 2010 at 1257.64 and has corrected as much as 20%, but is still down 10%.
Bob started the voyage of the Starship Moneytalk by reporting financial data that came out last week:Honey EC: Perhaps if the market turns up again, Brinker will find some reason to talk about it. In the meantime, I'd guess he's remaining silent because he doesn't want the information about the special online bulletin on the air -- yet.I called the program today. The call screener asked me what question I wanted to ask Bob. I told him I wanted to ask Bob's opinion of the stock market last week. Mr. Screener seemed to catch his breath and told me that it was getting too late in the hour to take calls and hung up on me.
* New home sales: at historic lows - 295,000 units annual = 25,000 sales per month.
* S&P Case-Schiller Home Price Index: monthly gain in large markets of 0.9%.
* Consumer Confidence Index: Slight uptick from 45.4 from 45.2 = some stability.
* Durable Goods: Decline 0.1% month on month.
* Core Inflation Index: 1.6% year-over-year, same this month as last month.
* University of Michigan Wolverine Confidence Index: up-ticked to 59.4 from 59.7 the prior month.
* Gross Domestic Product: Revised upward to 1.3% annual rate of growth in Q2.
Bob said: "Now there have been some private economists out there talking about the likelihood of another recession in the United States.....The most obvious historical definition of a recession is two consecutive quarters of negative GDP, two in a row.....One of the popular notions going around is a recession is whatever you say it is, whatever you think. That's not true. If you want consistency, you have to go with the long-held definition."* Initial Jobless Claims: Weekly came in at 391,000. Prior week 428,000 (revised) = decline 37,000 weekly. Four week moving average is 417,000.
Bob said: "When you are looking in the four hundred thousands, you're in a situation where the economy is growing very slowly, not creating the number of jobs you want created."First hour calls (all of them):
* Ryan in Spokane disagreed with Bob about the definition of a recession. Bob said that you can't just define a recession as whatever you want it to be.
* Eric in Santa Cruz said he was offered a re-financed loan at a lower percentage rate with no appraisal, no fees and no questions asked. Bob said he'd call that bank mismanagement -- perhaps it was "Robo-signed" contract.
* Judy from East Bay said she needed to begin taking minimum distributions from her IRA. She had been investing in laddered CDs and wondered what to do now. Bob told her she was doing the right thing.
* Dan from Central Valley said he was age 53 and asked for early retirement advice. Bob used up the rest of the first hour asking Dan questions. Bob advised him to be sure that retiring early would make both him and his wife happy.
Second hour calls (all of them):
* Scott from Cape Cod said he fully supported the protestors on Wall Street and then ranted about "international Jewish bankers." Bob cut him off and said that kind of ethnic slurs would not be allowed on the program.
* Joyce from Indiana wanted to raise capital gains rates incrementally on higher-incomes. Bob responded that "Fairness is in the eye of the beholder."
* Rodney in Georgia disagreed with Bob about the huge exit packages for CEOs of large corporations -- he thought that in many cases they were well-deserved. Bob reminded him about the "genius at Yahoo!" who turned down the $31+ offer a few years back.
* Larry from Cape Girardeau wanted to talk about Keynesian economics. Bob repeated his opinion that the government has been doing "the opposite of what John Maynard Keynes recommended."
*Andy from Redwood City talked about Keynesian economics...Bob said he was "sick and tired" of the "distortions" of Keynes -- that Keynes recommended saving money in the good times to prepare for the bad times.
* Tony said he was declaring bankruptcy and wanted advice on how to protect his IRA from creditors. Bob told him to check his state law, that each state has different bankruptcy laws. For example, in Florida personal residences are protected.
Several times today, Bob talked about Warren Buffett and how Buffett called for increased taxes on "the rich" even though he has very little income in wages. Most of Buffetts income comes from capital gains, capital growth and dividends. Bob said that Buffett is now claiming that he didn't say that the rich should be taxed more. However, Bob said that is simply not true because he heard Buffett say it in a Liz Clayman interview. Bob also pointed out that Buffett is donating a great deal of money to the Obama re-election campaign.
Honey EC: Oh my, how Warren Buffett has come down from the pedestal Bob once had him on. Who knows, maybe someday Bob will see how disgusting it is that the man goes around whining because he doesn't pay enough taxes while he shelters billions by giving it to organizations that promote his liberal agendas -- when he could just send a check to the IRS.
Brinker's guest-speaker was John Sylvia, Managing Director and Chief Economist for Wells Fargo. Sylvia wrote: "Dynamic Economic Decision Making"
RECESSION COMING? WHO IS RIGHT, ECRI OR BRINKER AND HIS GUEST?
As of August and September, Bob is forecasting 1-2% economic growth for year 2011, and "gradual growth" in 2012. That would preclude a recession based on his definition of recession. John Sylvia also sees slow growth. However, Lakshman Achuthan of ECRI has said that the economy is "tipping into recession." Excerpts from Business Cycle, September 30th:
"Here’s what ECRI’s recession call really says: if you think this is a bad economy, you haven’t seen anything yet. And that has profound implications for both Main Street and Wall Street."In the third hour, caller Nick from Texas said: "A prominent professional,Lakshman Achuthan of Economic Cycle Research Institute is now predicting an imminent recession and the downward cycle of everything that's going to feed on itself -- the slowdown in China, the situation in Europe, it's sort of tipped over. And that being a pretty conservative forecaster and very careful in their deliberations, I'm wondering how you see the next six months panning out with everything that's going on.?"
John Sylvia replied: "I think you are very fortunate to be in Texas and you are doing pretty will with energy prices and the nature of the diversified economy in Texas.....But I do see overall just slow economic growth in the U.S. We're still going through transitions in terms of the housing market, the de-leveraging in the American consumer, and continued challenges in employment. I think yes, Europe is having a challenge because it's coming to grips with a very large state enterprise, particularly in countries like Greece and Portugal that are not able to meet their budget needs with the current pace of economic growth. They have to re-trench and that suggest a transition period that's very tough for people as well as countries and it's a longer work off period, but it is what we are going through, Nick."
In his newsletter summary of yesterday's program, David Korn wrote these comments about Bob's formerly high opinion of ECRI:
"I was doing some research in my old newsletters, and Bob quite often during the bull market of 1982-2000 spoke highly of ECRI and even suggested he used their work as at least part of his market timing decisions. The thing is that Bob has been pretty vocal that a recession is not in the cards and Bob has, shall we say, some "issues" with eating crow and quickly admitting he is wrong. That usually comes long after it is quite apparent he has been wrong like after he had predicted no recession in May, 2008. Now he may not be wrong this time. We shall only know in the fullness of time as he would like to say, but I am keeping a much more open mind than he is about this."Be aware that on May 31, 2008, just as the megabear market was picking up speed, Bob said this on Moneytalk: “What we have right in here now is evidence that the Cassandras, who earlier this year, were telling us we were in recession – right now they’ve basically – well I’ll be kind, basically, they look like fools right now. Because all that they’ve accomplished with their talk about recession…………all that they have to show for their efforts is that they scared the people who listened to them out of the stock market this past winter....."
Bob was completely wrong then and had issued buy signals at the same time. Now here in 2011 with the market falling, he is not predicting a recession and is issuing buy-signals. Think it over. A flipped coin comes up heads 50% of the time. Is he right this time?
Don't pay to listen On Demand to the Charlie Maxwell interview from last Sunday, read the summary for free on this Blog [LINK].
48 comments:
I called Moneytalk at 2:45 today and they ANSWERED THE PHONE AND ASKED, "What is your question."
I told them I wanted to ask what Bob Brinker thought about the stock market last week.
They said: "Okaaayy...uh....We are running out of time for open calls but thanks for calling."
Click! Dial tone....
If they were indeed running out of time for calls, why answer the phone and inquire about your topic?
After being administered with truth serum the screener would have replied:
"I'm sorry but I am under strict instructions by the host to not allow any calls concerning the stock market, market timing in general or questions concerning Mr Brinker's past recommendations.
Anything else you would like to talk about? Bob's favorite color?"
Birdbrain,
That was my opinion exactly. Why would they even answer the phone for the remainder of the hour if they weren't taking any more calls? And why would he ask me what was my question?
I guess the way to get on the air with a stock market question is to lie about your topic.
I intend to do this every week from now on just to see how long before they let me ask Bob what he thought about the stock market the prior week.
One more thing: This was the first time that I didn't get a busy signal when I've called.
They didn't take HB's call, but Andy from Redwood City got his nose under the tent, again.
And they took a call from a whack job on Cape Cod, who, I believe has been on before with the same rant, and who BB dealt with today, as he dealt with him before.
-- Frankj
Hey, tell the screener you want to talk about the economy and if a recession is coming. Or what a recession is! Then broadside him with a stock market question instead! And listen to him stumble and grumble!
If the screener can't be honest, why should the callers be?
- Dan
Should of told the screener you wanted to ask Bob why he calls his newsletter "Market Timer".
or if you wanted to get on live
How happy you are with his newsletter and his crystal clear on demand service that you listen to while you are counting your millions that Bob help you earn through his outstanding porfolios.
Joey
Question I would love to hear:
How can you issue an all in buy signal when you are all ready 100% invested?
Joey
Well, it's "official" now. The long term MACD indicator has given a sell signal just as it did in late 2007, early 2008.
While no indicator is perfect, this has a pretty good record.
Add to that the H&S continuation pattern in the major averages, as well as the sharply downtrending 50-day moving average, and you might have some serious concerns about the health of this market. At least I sure do!
How to get on and get a question in past the delete button.
Tell the screener you are impressed with Brinker's advice for GNMAs and want to ask a question.
When you are on, say you have been impressed with his advice for GNMAs since 2007 when you started to listen. Ask if he knows the total return since then.
Then ask why didn't he put these into his model portfolios 1 and 2 rather than have them all in stocks with a gift horse buy in the mid 1400s when the market was in the mid 1500s?
Someone who started to follow his advice to be fully invested in the 1500s now sees the market in the low 1100s. He had a gift horse buy in the 1460s if you started to follow him when the market was in the 1500s. At 1120, you are down 340 pts from that buy signal.
Nothing wrong with being wrong on market timing, but why pretend he was accurate with these phoney-balogna buy signals nobody can follow who took his advice the past few years?
In the United States, the Business Cycle Dating Committee of the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) is generally seen as the authority for dating US recessions. The NBER defines an economic recession as: "a significant decline in economic activity spread across the economy, lasting more than a few months, normally visible in real GDP, real income, employment, industrial production, and wholesale-retail sales." Almost universally, academics, economists, policy makers, and businesses defer to the determination by the NBER for the precise dating of a recession's onset and end. This is the point the first caller Ryan was making.
Bob Brinker doesn't seem to like the idea of the NBER calling recessions. Maybe that is because he went on his famous Cassandra rant in May 2008 saying we were not headed towards a recession. A few months latter the NBER announced that a recession had stared in December 2007. Someone needs to call Bob and ask him what start and end dates he puts on the last recession.
So Dan G says it looks like it is time to get out of the market and Bob B. bulletin says it's time to jump into the market.
Everybody else is just sitting there.
Scotty
Andy in Redwood City has racked up quite a few frequent flier miles here on the starship moneytalk. Honey has documented six calls in the last ten months. He was also on 11 February 2011 when Lynn was hosting. He said the government has failed us when it comes to solving the unemployment problem. Lynn got upset with him. He often gets argumentative with Bob defending DNC talking points.
Andy should consider writing a book and he could get Bob to have him on as a guest for the entire third hour.
December 19 2010
Caller Andy from Redwood City disagreed with Brinker that the tax cut extension will create jobs and he was for tariffs to protect union jobs. Brinker told him that he had recited all of the Democrat talking points very well and suggested that he contact Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont who spent 8 1/2 hours filibustering against the bill. Brinker also pointed out that "globalization had already happened and was here to stay."
March 13 2011
Andy called in from Redwood city. He said he didn't agree with Bob's position on nuclear power but he didn't want to go into it. Then he quoted some statistics on tax revenues and felt they justified increasing taxes. Bob didn't agree. He said that the problems caused by Sacramento were the result of run away spending and mismanagement. Andy went on to blame prop 13.
May 1 2011
Andy in Redwood city called in the last hour. He talked about an effort to reinstate the Glass-Steagal Act. He claimed that some democrats supported it but NO republicans did. According to the Huffington Post John McCain was one of the sponsors of the bill. I don't know if Andy is just ignorant on this or if he is a liar with a political agenda.
Sunday, June 5, 2011
BI-PARTISAN EFFORT TO SELL U.S. DOWN THE RIVER...Caller Andy from Redwood City said he agreed with Brinker's monologue about the Commodity Futures Modernization Act. Brinker said: "I know I'm correct.....This is what drives me nuts, so many people out there are missing the point I made earlier. This is a bi-partisan effort to sell the United States down the river. It's not one party or the other. It's both of them."
Andy continued: "They are both against us. Phil Graham, Robert Rubin, Bill Clinton and Alan Greenspan did us in." Brinker replied: "There you go, you have two Democrats and two Republicans right there."
September 18 2011
Andy from Redwood City said that he totally disagreed with Bob on Warren Buffett. He said that when this country went to war in the past (he mentioned Lincoln, Civil War; Roosevelt, Spanish-American War; Wilson, WWI), the rich came up with the money to pay the debt -- but that this didn't happen with Iraq and Afghanistan. He said the bottom line is that during the Eisenhower Administration in the 1950's, the top tax bracket was 91% after the first $100,000. And it was 70% before Reagan got in, and the 35% is way too low.
Bob managed to talk him down and asked him what he thought was a fair amount of tax for high-earners. Andy said 50%. Bob reminded him that in California it's already there. Bob ended by saying, "Andy, you are so misinformed on this subject, it is sad."
02 October 2011
*Andy from Redwood City talked about Keynesian economics...Bob said he was "sick and tired" of the "distortions" of Keynes -- that Keynes recommended saving money in the good times to prepare for the bad times.
Dan G said...
Well, it's "official" now. The long term MACD indicator has given a sell signal just as it did in late 2007, early 2008.
While no indicator is perfect, this has a pretty good record.
Add to that the H&S continuation pattern in the major averages, as well as the sharply downtrending 50-day moving average, and you might have some serious concerns about the health of this market. At least I sure do!
Do we tell you enough how much "we" appreciate your commentaries and contribution in this forum? Well it is appreciated....
tfb
So Dan G says it looks like it is time to get out of the market and Bob B. bulletin says it's time to jump into the market.
Everybody else is just sitting there.
Scotty
It depends on how you view it. I have some money to work into the market...I am looking for the entry point and I side with Dan...that is why I have not been buying in yet this year...also the stocks I like are holding up very well, so they are not the bargains I would like.
I think Brinker is wrong in the sense there is more weakness ahead and I think you may get slaughtered if you buy general funds. I want to cherry pick stocks at this point in time.
One thing that makes me skeptical is, if we head into a bear market it may be short lived...i.e. it may seal Obama's fate and then the forward looking market will pick up on the idea he will be out of office and we will have a much livelier economy once the economic retard is out of office.
tfb
Too early for another special member's alert "gift horse, all in buy signal"?
Joey
Joey asked: "Too early for another special member's alert "gift horse, all in buy signal"?"
LOL! Well, it's only been eleven days since the last one which was issued on September 22nd. Cleverly, the bulletin does not name a level, just gives that day's closing price, which was 1129.
Right now the S&P is at 1107. So far, buying at 1129 is not working out too well, but maybe the market will rally before the close. That is all Bob Brinker cares about -- the closing numbers.
How long before this is removed from his website:
Special Subscriber Message is available by clicking on Special Subscriber Message (September 22) at the homepage
I am hearing a bear growl...very close, so close you can feel his breath on the back of your neck...
tfb
"Economic retard"?
Now careful, that's a very un-fuzzy term, Mr. Bunny!
Whether Bob likes only closing numbers, or intraday numbers, it doesn't make much difference today for the S&P, since the low and the closing numbers are one and the same!
AND, the index is at a new closing reaction low. Only by a point, but still a new low.
AND, it's only 10 points away from a 20% drop from the closing high, which would put it in bear market territory.
So all is not roses in Wall Street today...unless you've got a wad of SDS's! (Yes, I do!)
I find it odd that bob never really answered the guy who wanted to retire.
Pete
Coincidentally, the 7/1/1998 correction low for the S&P was 1017.01. Here we are, over 13 yers later, at roughly the same level.
With 3 bear markets during that time (assuming we enter Bear Market #3 in upcoming days), why would J6P ever want to get back into these markets??
DD
Pete,
You're right. Bob Brinker didn't give the caller any kind of clear answer. He just advised him to be sure that it was what he and his wife really wanted to do.
But did you notice how long he dragged out the call. I didn't time it, but it seemed like it went on for several minutes.
"Coincidentally, the 7/1/1998 correction low for the S&P was 1017.01. Here we are, over 13 yers later, at roughly the same level."
THIRTEEN YEARS??? And nothing to show for it.
I used to think that buying and holding on to the broad market index fund would be just like having a savings account for my retirement. Over the years it would always go up.
Savings rates are nothing and the stock market has provided nothing for over thirteen years. Where should I invest my money for a safe return?
Emily
Found at Investorshub. An explanation of Brinker's online bulletin:
Buying opportunity? Both John Bollinger and Bob Brinker (Marketimer) have sent out bullish hotlines tonight, Thursday, September 22. Bollinger says "The point here is that though we find ourselves retesting the lows we are in a very bullish monetary environment. I note also that today we had way less 52-week new lows than we did when we initially revisited this level on August 8th. It may seem crazy to be bullish at these levels, but to me it seems crazy not to be."
Bob Brinker says that an attractive buying opportunity has developed and he upgrades his stock market view to attractive for purchase.
Both Bollinger and Brinker have been bullish, but it is nice seeing them confirm their views.
Investors Business Daily, however switched their current outlook to "market in correction," and recommended cutting losses. In this market, a disciplined investor's bias should be to cut losses and sell winners before they cycle into a loss. "As Thursday's action shows, there are few places safer than cash."
HB: yeah, the call from the guy who was wondering if he should retire was a strange one, dragging out for so long. I would have told the guy no, based on his assets.
He had at least one sprout yet to go to college. House not fully paid for. Did BB bring up the topic of paying for health coverage if he no longer had employer provided after retiring? I was listening for it but didn't hear it.
Emily: high dividend paying stocks is one place to invest, using an ETF or buying individual securities. I'm talking about stocks that have a solid history of dividend payments going back years.
Pete wrote:
I find it odd that bob never really answered the guy who wanted to retire.
Yeah, at first I thought Brinker would ask him how much he needs per year to live. Either Brinker does not believe in retiring that early or he was afraid to look into the future that far. Maybe Brinker simply didn't want to become involved in such an important decision in a person's life. Since the guy was 53 he could very well live another 30 years so he needs to use a reputable retirement calculator.
Dan G wrote:
AND, it's only 10 points away from a 20% drop from the closing high, which would put it in bear market territory.
Yes, I wonder if Bob Brinker is staying up all night tonight watching the futures. They are pointing higher right now. If he misses two consecutive bear markets his subscriber base will really take a hit.
Frank said: "Emily: high dividend paying stocks is one place to invest, using an ETF or buying individual securities. I'm talking about stocks that have a solid history of dividend payments going back years."
I agree, Frank. And I was doing just that before the market started to look spookey.
At that point I started short term trading the "short" ETFs.
Now the the market has seemingly given up the ghost, with all TA indicators I follow pointing to a longer term down-trend, I'm hanging on to and adding to those ETFs at opportune moments.
But even bear markets are subject to sharp rallies, so it's not a time for napping, but taking profits at extremely oversold points, adding at overbought ones. That's the plan, anyway!
If a bear roars in the forest and no one hears it on Moneytalk, does it make a sound?
Anonymous said...
So Dan G says it looks like it is time to get out of the market and Bob B. bulletin says it's time to jump into the market.
Everybody else is just sitting there.
Scotty
I thought Dan issued an official sell signal about two months ago. It was about one or two weeks after Bob Brinker said this:
STOCK MARKET....Brinker said: "Isn't it amazing how the stock market has taken all of this in stride. I was looking at the S&P 500. It's actually setting about 5% below its closing high for the year, which is truly amazing.....This is resilience when you look at this kind of political drama out of Washington DC......Remember we had a caller when the market was at 1268 at the end of June who asked whether he should sell out of the market because of the debt ceiling debate......Of course, the market is now at 1292, a couple of percent higher than when that call came in at the end of June. So this is what happens. If that individual would have sold out at 1270 at that time, he would be faced now with either sitting it out or re-entering at a higher level."
Honey EC: In spite of the year-to-date figure that Brinker used to make his point, the stock market has had six straight days of losses -- the Dow falling 581 points or 4 percent. The S&P 500 Index closed at 1292 on Friday, down 3.9% for the week.
Brinker continued: "And certainly we've seen some nice dollar-cost-average opportunities this past week in the market. I must admit on Friday I was taking advantage of some of the bargains that were out there with the market in the 1200's, reacting to this hyper-drama out of Washington DC. I know many of you also have been taking advantage of the dollar-cost-averaging opportunities on short-term weakness - and certainly it's minor. I mean, 5% is really noise when you look at the market over time.......If you've been listening to this broadcast, we have not been part of the panic-brigade here on Moneytalk.
Uh oh... S&P in Bear market territory!
Time for a guest host?!
Bob Brinker's latest all-in buy signal level was given on the 22nd when the S&P 500 Index was at 1129.
But he covered himself for some fluctuation by saying anywhere new the August or September lows was "attractive for purchase."
The S&P is well below those lows.
It's well below those lows now.
If I read the charts right, the August low was on the 8th at 1119.46.
The September low was on the 22nd at 1129.56.
It was a low as 1070 this morning and is at 1099 right now.
Will the market recover from here? No one knows, CERTAINLY not the buy-and-hold market-timer.
It seems like we have "experts" making predictions positive and negative on the market/economy going forward. I guess at this time we should revist the guys/gals that predicted that last downturn in 2008.
John Mauldin was one of those that got it right in 2008 and he came out September 10th "Preparing for the Credit Crisis".
"I do not want to own anything that looks like an index fund or long-only mutual fund". "I see much more risk for potential reward and I would not be long-money center bank stocks or bonds , not in the US and especially in Europe"
What was Bank of America & Citi trading on 9/10/2011?
Looks like a short-covering rally is under way, so the best place for chickens like me is on the sidelines. And that's where I am now.
The S&P is fighting mightily to keep its head above bear market territory, and seems to be succeeding for now.
With the stochastic oscillator so oversold, a short-term spring-back rally could come at any time. That should provide an opportunity to go short again. Maybe tomorrow, maybe in a couple of days. But not today! Happy trading and investing, but never mix the two!
Man, can that Brinker call the bottom or what? Early in the morning everybody was crying about the new bear market and then it turns into a bull run.
Brinker has shown once again the mark of a true market professional rather than one of those dime-store amateur talking heads. It just doesn't get any better.
Bfan
"Man, can that Brinker call the bottom or what?"
No denying that today was a spectacular one-day reversal. And Bob has probably thrown his arm out of joint, patting himself on the back! But it's too early to tell if his joy will be long-lasting.
So, no bear market, right? Not so fast! One day reversals are amazing to see, but seldom spell the absolute bottom of a correction. Usually more backing and filling is required. (See One Day Reversals in Edwards & Magee's "TA of Stock Trends".
Nevertheless, today was the first day of a rally in a correction, so the next thing to be on the lookout for is a "follow-through" day within the optimum window of 4-7 days from today, including today as day 1.
So the optimum window opens this Friday and will close next Wednesday. It could be the end Bob and others have been looking for. I doubt it, but still it COULD be!
rally was news based not technical IMO just like the other ones when Euronews hit - today's was move to full capitalization of banks in case Greece defaults - or some such nonsense - double dippers are still out there shortin'
Greek default issue will come to a head on 10/13 is what I remember when next traunch is needed to prevent default - contagion issue ala Lehman
I love how his nonsense about testing lows is the same crap he published in 2008. He's been 100% in equities all the time!!!
Honeybee wrote
From 5/31/08: Cassandra Bashing
STOCK MARKET.... Bob Brinker said: “The stock market had a good month in the month of May, finishing at 1400.38 in the S&P 500 Index……….a gain of about 1.48%.........and for the second consecutive month the market showed gains. The Dow finished the month at 12,638, that was up 1.3% for the week……..and the Nasdaq Composite had a big week – up 3.2% to close at 2522.”
RECESSION CASSANDRAS.... Brinker said: “What we have right in here now is evidence that the Cassandras, who earlier this year, were telling us we were in recession – right now they’ve basically – well I’ll be kind, basically, they look like fools right now. Because all that they’ve accomplished with their talk about recession…………all that they have to show for their efforts is that they scared the people who listened to them out of the stock market this past winter……….”
CORRECTION LOW AND TESTS.... Brinker said: “……..And probably a lot of those people got scared out near the correction lows. The initial correction low in January, which was successfully tested in mid-March, before the market reversed and resumed its uptrend. And basically, if you were to total up all of the accomplishments of the Cassandras, that would be it – that they scared people out of the market during a stock market correction in the first quarter………..Because they have been unable to present any evidence of a recession."
STOCK MARKET BEARS.... Brinker said: “So what we have here basically, is an example of false prophets and it’s sad. And the reason it’s sad is the damage done. Think of the people that are looking today at the market, S&P at 1400 and they’ve been scared out of the market in the first quarter by these bears………It’s just amazing and yet these people are out there, and these people are not happy, I’m sure, to find themselves out of a rising market since March. To find themselves looking for ever lower prices when in fact we’ve had the opposite.
Mr. K wrote of Brinker "He loves to talk about the market after a rally after any of his numerous, fully invested buy signals. Probably sells a lot of newsletters. When the market is down, maybe he sells newsletters to people thinking he has a sell....
How many newsletters would he sell if he called it "Buy And Hold Since(S&P500 was at)1565 Timer?"
Bfan_not = Shill_not = Honest
QED
FYI to anyone who needs a refund of the $185 Markettimer subscription price: be persistent. His staff may agree over the phone to refund the money. But somehow it just never gets to your bank account. Don't bother calling his office endlessly and listening to the runaround. Just call your bank and have them back-charge Brinker for the funds.
AMK
Bfan wrote:
Man, can that Brinker call the bottom or what? Early in the morning everybody was crying about the new bear market and then it turns into a bull run.
Brinker has shown once again the mark of a true market professional rather than one of those dime-store amateur talking heads. It just doesn't get any better.
You got to be kidding! Why was Brinker buying the market when the S&P was in the 1200's if he thought it was going lower? The technicals indicate that the correction is not over. The Monday close of 1099 was a double-bottom breakdown. This is a bearish indicator. Since it was almost 3% lower than Brinker's buy area we most likely will have to retest that low if not go lower. If we go lower then we will have to look at the 1030 level that Brinker used as the low for a prior correction.
Anonymous Anonymous said...
FYI to anyone who needs a refund of the $185 Markettimer subscription price: be persistent.
Do you think I could get my money back from 1987?
Yesterday the stock market turnaround was phenomenal! Some think it was the bottom and it's headed up.
Bob Brinker is on record saying the August-September lows will hold and the S&P is headed for low-to-mid 1400s in 2012.
Mark Hulbert's column this morning. He asks: Are we now officially in a bear market?
Mr Hulbert in his article is refering to cyclical bear markets. We are in a secular bear market since 2000.
In the last century we have had secular bear markets from 1929 till 1942 and from 1966 till 1982. Current secular bear market is 11 years of age now.
Bearometer
Strazzullo says keep your powder dry wait for the lower end of the range 950 to 1100 - saying bouncing off fair value @ 1100 is getting weaker.
if the above video doesn't work go CNBC's latest video's and look for this one: Stocks Wrestle with the Bear Market Wed 05 Oct 11 | 10:10 AM
I suspect it will take some kind of event driven issue to take us down this low - it could be the issue of growth or the sovereign debt issue.
Mkt appears to be picking up a little steam on upside, if it fades toward the close - we have more downside work to do.
"We are in a secular bear market since 2000."
Didn't Bob Brinker say the secular bear market ended? Didn't Asp Holeman (or some name like that) on Suite101 use this declaration by "the Bob" as an opportunity to go from cash to stocks, just before the last major bear market?
Hopefully Honeybee has a quote somewhere.
sign me CONFUSED!
Confused asked: "Didn't Bob Brinker say the secular bear market ended?
The short answer is yes he did, but he declared it back on again last year!
Here's what happened:
Bob Brinker originally said a secular bear market began in 2000, then in 2007, he retroactively said the secular bear had ended in 2006. Here is the quote -- note the dates:
* June, 2007 Marketimer, Brinker said: "In our view, the valuation based secular bear market that was established following the March, 2000 closing high reached its conclusion on June 13, 2006"
He didn't mention the secular bear market again for the next three years, until he wrote this in 2010:
April 5, 2010, Marketimer, Brinker said: "The current secular bear megatrend began during the first quarter of Year 2000, and is now entering its eleventh year."
As for your question about "Asp Holeman" at Suite 101, you have a good memory. That is exactly what the person you are referring to did.
But you needed to add that just before he went all-in stocks, he been in all cash during a big market run-up.
I don't have access to his posts because due partly to his actions, all of the Bob Brinker "books" at S101 were "burned."
Bob gave a thumbs down to every GOP candidates tax reform ideas. And he coyly did not use the candidates names, referring to them by "the Governor of Texas" The Governor of the Commonwealth of Mass." And the "former CEO of Godfathers Pizza" This tells me he is a supporter of the Democrat party status quo. Or is he afraid that a true simple tax plan would make his advisory business less valuble?
Post a Comment