HOW FAST TO DOLLAR-COST-AVERAGE INTO STOCK MARKET NOW
Caller Mike from Los Angeles said: "You are not on live on KABC in LA....(BB claimed that it is live "sometimes" - he is wrong.) I have a large amount of funds ($350K) I want to invest in portfolio III. When you talk about dollar-cost-averaging...you typically suggest, four, five, six pieces. A little background. We just passed this last week the longest bull market run backing up the '90's. I'm anticipating, based on your newsletter (Marketimer) which was helpful - in your October letter a year ago, you said to anticipate a mid-term set-back this year so I took advantage of that. Thank you very much. That helped pay for the letter many times over. Anticipating the market topping say in the next year, year and half, how many pieces should I be breaking my money into?"
Honey EC: Brinker didn't mention that when stocks had the 10% correction in February that he sent out a bulletin stating that he was looking for a retest of those lows before issuing a new "buy-signal." That is all water under the bridge and he has moved back to old buy signals - leaving out the repeated mistakes in 2008-2009. Jim eloquently explained in the comment section today:
Jim Wrote:
"If caller Mike took advantage of the mid-term "setback" this year then he wasn't paying attention to Brinker who advised to wait for a retest. It seemed Brinker didn't want to talk about the current year correction but instead chose to mention prior year buying opportunities that he was able to identify. I wonder why. LOL"
MARKETIMER'S FIXED INCOME HOLDINGS....Brinker's reply to Mike: "I would say on model three on the fixed income side, I don't regard a need for DCA....We have largely inoculated that fixed income side by selecting short-duration portfolio assets. In fact, our average duration is less than one year....and the current income on that portfolio stands at a little less than 3%...…"
INTO EQUITIES.... Brinker's continued reply to Mike: "On the equity side, that comes down to your tolerance for risk....The fact is, if you are going to DCA money in, you want to do it in a way where if something goes awry in the market, you are not going to panic and do something that's going to be counter-productive. So I'd move it in on a schedule that you are comfortable with in terms your tolerance for risk - and that would be the key."
IT MUST BE FUN TO BE A PAYING CUSTOMER SO YOU CAN SHARE SECRETS WITH NATIONAL RADIO TALK SHOW HOST.....Honey EC: IMO, it is really scummy to leave out the vast majority of the audience while sharing long calls with subscribers about Marketimer portfolios - in hopes of pulling in a buck or two on the dangled carrot. Let me clarify: Brinker's model III portfolio is roughly half equities and half fixed income. He holds only two bond mutual funds, and as he has repeatedly said, Vanguard Prime Money Market on the fixed income side. Today Brinker described the duration and income from portfolio III fixed income holdings. The ONLY reason, he is getting 3% income on those two bond funds is because they contain high-yield junk bonds! Where else would he get 3% on one year duration?
CORRECTION IN 2018 LASTED NINE DAYS.... Brinker comments: The January/February 10% correction last a total of nine days.....We are looking at a market that is basically the longest cyclical bull market ever - we are at 9 1/2 years. ==> dRahme's Audio Clip: Brinker's stock market history comments, "Secondary Buy Signal"
BRINKER'S NEW INVENTION: "SECONDARY BUY-SIGNAL"...==> dRahme's Audio Clip: Brinker EXPLAINS new term for giving buy-signals while fully invested.
Honey EC: While I understand his embarrassment at the illogical and obvious scam of selling "buy-signals" while he has all followers, and model portfolios, fully invested, this only makes him look more foolish and desperate (in my opinion). Brinker's newly-minted "Secondary Buy-Signal," which he explained means to invest new money while already fully-invested, makes almost no logical sense to anyone who thinks rationally.
INTEREST RATES-INFLATION.....BB comments: Fed Chair Powell not concerned about inflation, but will gradually keep raising interest rates. PCE Index is now at acceptable almost 2%...Fed fears deflation....deflation is the "worst thing that can happen."
FED DUAL TRACK...BB comments: With the Fed on dual track right now, this has never occurred before: raising interest rates and Quantitative Tightening.
BRINKER READS FROM MARKETIMER: THE INVERTED YIELD CURVE.....Caller Marty from Kansas City asked Brinker to explain why he used the Fed Funds to diagnose a possible inverted yield curve. Marty cited the August issue of Marketimer. Brinker explained and read a WHOLE PARAGRAPH FROM MARKETIMER. ==>dRahme Audio Clip.....
NEW HOME SALES.... BB comments: "We have seen some sluggishness come in to the ….new home sales market still okay==>dRahme Audio Clip: New home sales, inventories rose, existing supply steady; median new home sales price decline 1%; Year-over-year GDP 2.8%.
KUDOS TO BRINKER FOR AN ACCURATE GDP REPORT….BB said: "The initial quarterly increase for second quarter GDP which was reported at 4.1%. The consensus revision is 4.0, and the range is 3.8 to 4.2. "Right now, year-over-year rate of real growth in GDP is 2.8%. If this number comes in close to 4%, there shouldn't be any change in that critical year-over-year number, which is the actual annual growth rate of the economy - adjusted for inflation. Now standing at 2.8%. That will come out on Wednesday morning."
SOCIAL SECURITY SUGGESTIONS... Caller Marty from Naperville has a suggestion for shoring up Social Security. BB reminds him of George Bush's suggestion to put some funds in the stock market - which clearly would have been profitable...…==>dRahme's Audio Clip (scroll half way).
NEXT WEEK IN THE CANYONS OF WALL STREET: ==> dRahme's Audio Clip
FRANKJ'S MONEYTALK GUEST-AUTHOR SUMMARY
Bob’s third hour guest on
August 26, 2018 was Professor Adam Tooze.
He is a professor at Columbia University but today he weighed in from
Berlin. The prof has written a number of
books and his latest is titled: “Crashed: How A Decade of Financial Crises
Changes the World.”
Oh boy … regular readers know what comes next. All together now, “ANOTHER BOOK ABOUT THE
2008 FINANCIAL MELTDOWN??” Yes,
unfortunately. Adam Tooze joins the very
long Conga line of third hour guests on this overworked, overanalyzed
topic. Who chooses these guests? Does Bob think this topic is still of
interest after nearly 10 years?
Thankfully they didn’t spend the whole interview
rehashing the financial crisis.
Bob said the Bear Stearns
bailout in March of 2008 should have been a warning shot, but it did not
accomplish any substantial protective measures. No kidding.
Someone (who was that?) saw no major consequences for the stock market
and kept recommending adding money as it declined. There was some discussion of Lehman
Bros. The guest speculated that the head
of Lehman might have seen the Bear Stearns bailout as a good omen but the rug
was pulled out when the powers-that-be in government said “fuggetaboudit.”
Bob asked if the Fed fulfill
their role as the lender of last resort.
The prof said yes, the Fed lent trillions to US banks and to foreign
ones as well. These loans were
collateralized.
So, why is the Fed
demonized, asked Bob. Answer: all this
lending revealed a disconcerting fact:
Money has no tangible underpinning, i.e. gold backing, it can be created
out of thin air as illustrated by the Fed granting credit where needed.
The only caller was Dan
from Des Moines who (I think) asked a question but it was hard to discern. Fortunately the guest untangled it for
us. The Fed is focused on inflation,
but in today’s economy where the internet and all the business associated with
it enhance our ability to find out prices – inflationary pressures are eased. The answer went on to describe how deflation
hurts debtors, and the consequences of deflation on any equity one might have
in their home.
There was some talk of
reparations following World War I. (This
was the subject of a different book the guest wrote). The US had loaned money to the UK and France,
and they needed payback from Germany to pay the US. The consequences were foretold by John
Maynard Keynes who was an observer at the Versailles conference. He wrote afterward that the harsh reparations
would sow the seeds of another major conflict.
Bob brought up tariffs by
saying “My aim is not to get political in any way …” The guest played off this and said he is
surprised the current administration went after so many countries all at once. There was good reason to try and deal with
China, but not a good idea to “lash out” at everyone.
How many more authors are out there in the weeds
with a manuscript on the 2008 meltdown?
How many will get published and find themselves guests in the third
hour? We will know in the fullness of
time. As for me – what the heck, these summaries all pay the same.
Bob wrapped up at
3:51.
Honey here: Thanks Frankj. For me, the words "lashing out" used by so much of the Trump-hating media, told me all I needed to know about that guest. As for Brinker claiming he wasn't "aiming to be political," how stupid does he think his audience really is? (Rhetorical question!)
As always, I bristle when I hear Brinker singing the praises of John Maynard Keynes - but that subject has been discussed in the past when he used to do it almost weekly.
CHARLES SCHWAB MARKETS REPORTS AT CLOSE FRIDAY:
U.S. stocks finished the week in strong fashion as market participants seemingly had a dovish take on Fed Chairman Jerome Powell's Jackson Hole speech and as business spending reportedly rose for the fourth-straight month. Treasury yields ticked to the downside, gold and crude oil prices advanced and the U.S. dollar declined...….
The Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) advanced 133 points (0.5%) to 25,790, the S&P 500 Index increased 18 points (0.6%) to 2,875, and the Nasdaq Composite gained 68 points (0.9%) to 7,946. In moderate volume, 611 million shares were traded on the NYSE and 1.9 billion shares changed hands on the Nasdaq. WTI crude oil ticked $0.89 higher to $68.72 per barrel and wholesale gasoline was up $0.01 at $2.07 per gallon. Elsewhere, the Bloomberg gold spot price added $19.79 to $1,205.35 per ounce, and the Dollar Index—a comparison of the U.S. dollar to six major world currencies—was nearly 0.6% lower at 95.13.
Markets were higher for the week, as the DJIA increased 0.5%, the S&P 500 Index advanced 0.9%, and the Nasdaq Composite jumped 1.7%.
Listen Talk Radio:
TALKOFCONNECTICUT