STOCKS....Brinker comments: "Obviously lots of volatility in the stock market this week. We had two up days, and we had two down days, following the holiday on Monday...….For the week the S&P was up 0.5% and the Dow was down 0.5%. Obviously, the investors are trying to evaluate a number of things going out there that are very important. One of them is the enormous increase in yields that we have seen in the sovereign debt of Italy this week. Also investors evaluating the imposition of the steel and aluminum tariffs by the U.S. against the EU, Canada and Mexico....."
Honey EC: Brinker has made no changes to his position of fully invested in equities, and recommends dollar-cost-averaging new money.
FOMC RECONVENE ON JUNE 12th and 13th...… Brinker comments: "....a two-day pajama party…..that will finish with a media conference by Fed Chair Jerome Powell. And we are expecting another rate increase to be announced on the 13th...."
INTEREST RATES GOING UP....Brinker believes that the Fed will raise rates again June 13th.
BOND DURATION IN MARKETIMER....Brinker said that the duration of Marketimer bond fund holding is less then one year. He does not recommend holding bond funds with durations longer than that because of rising interest rates.
Honey EC: Brinker only has two bond funds in Marketimer now because he sold Metrowest (MWCRX) back in February 2018, and put that money into Vanguard Prime Money Market Fund.
BRINKER ADMITS INVESTING GIANT VANGUARD DISAGREES WITH HIM.....Caller Karen from San Francisco said that Vanguard had recently put a large percentage of her investments in Vanguard Total Bond Market Index and in Vanguard Total Bond Index Funds. She said: "After listening to you, all of these are way too long duration...…."
Brinker replied to Karen: "There is a fundamental difference of opinion between Vanguard and yours truly about the issue of interest rate risk. Vanguard has its own opinion of this, and they function with that opinion, which they are entitled to do. I have my own opinion and I function with that opinion as I am entitled to do. And my opinion is that in a rising interest rate environment, I do not want to take an undue amount of interest rate risk in a fixed income portfolio. What that means is, in my investment letter, I have reduced the risk to an average duration of less than one year, and that is as far as I'm willing to go on an average duration basis because of the rising interest rate trends that we are seeing."
Honey EC: Brinker NEVER tells the whole truth about his "opinion" of rising interest rates. He made the big call to short duration back in 2013! At that time, he made huge (and costly) changes in Marketimer for his subscribers and talked about it on the air. That included selling all Vanguard Ginnie Mae Fund and all Nasdaq holdings. So now FIVE YEARS later, he is claiming to be "right." (What is that saying about a stopped-clock?)
HEADS UP ON THIS ONE.....Brinker comments: "The low employment figures that we now have. This 3.8 number, they do have a strong correlation with the later stages of an economic cycle. This 3.8 number is really way down there on a historical basis.....The last that U.S. unemployment was 3.8%, the 10-year Treasury yield was around 6 1/2%.....The 10-year Treasury right now is about 2 7/8%......It has not been up to that level of 6 1/2 anytime since year-2000. You may recall the stock market peaked back in the first quarter of year-2000 and the Dow topped in January, and the rest of the market topped out in March 2000....."
ECONOMY…..Brinker said: "We are now in an economy where we are seeing moderate growth. The second quarter looks better than the first quarter. The first quarter is currently at 2.2 in real GDP...I'm expecting a higher number when it is released in late July."
Honey EC: Brinker used to often give the racial demographics of unemployment. It always showed that Black and Hispanic unemployment was much higher than Whites. Well, the great news now is that Black unemployment has been declining and is now below 6% - AN HISTORICALLY LOW NUMBER.
HOUSING MARKET...Continues to grow at a moderate pace.
BRINKER'S NEGATIVE SYNOPSIS ABOUT TRUMP'S PUSH TOWARD FAIR TRADE FOR THE UNITED STATES....dRahme's AUDIO CLIP (Honeybee sez: That is one side of the subject and is peppered heavily with Brinker's unchallenged biases.)
DON'T BE A SHARK-VICTIM OF ANNUITY SALESMEN.....Brinker recommended checking out these three things before buying an annuity: 1. Surrender charges. 2. Expenses. 3. Commissions for selling it to you. After you know those things, then go to Vanguard and take a look at what they offer - much less cost to you!
THE WEEK AHEAD IN THE CANYONS OF WALL STREET: dRahme AUDIO CLIP
FRANKJ'S MONEYTALK GUEST-AUTHOR SUMMARY
Bob’s guest on this first
weekend of June 2018 was Wall Street Journal reporter John Carreyou, author of the book, "Bad Blood: Secrets and Lies in a Silicon Valley Startup" Mr. Carreyou is a two-time Pulitzer prize
winning reporter.
The topic of the book is
the company Theranos and the founder, Elizabeth Holmes. Holmes dropped out of Stanford University in 2003
to start a company that would specialize in new technology for blood
testing. Her idea was to use
proprietary equipment that would only require tiny amounts of blood to analyze
blood. (Tiny as in 1/100th
to 1/1000th the normal amount).
Blood testing by diagnostic labs is a $70 billion industry in the
U.S.
Theranos raised $700
million from private investors after they announced in 2013 that their
equipment and technology would be available in Walgreens’ stores. Among the financially well-off who invested
were Carlos Slim (Mexican billionaire and owner of the New York Times); one of the Murdochs, (owners of the Wall Street
Journal); Betsy DeVos; the Walton family (WalMart).
In the interview, Mr.
Carreyou described how he got interested in this story after coming in contact
with a group that was watching developments at the company and had their
doubts. He spoke with a lab director who
had left the company and initially, was very leery of talking to a
reporter.
This scheme unraveled
starting in 2015 when Mr. Carreyou’s investigative findings on the company were
reported in the Wall Street Journal despite heavy pushback and intimidation
from lawyers representing Theranos. The
lead lawyer for the company is David Boies, who is a high-profile guy and head
of his own firm.
The state of Arizona
figured prominently in the story. I’m
guessing that Theranos installed their equipment in Walgreens’ and other places
in the state. The guest said that 80,000
patients in AZ had questionable results and 900,000 tests had to be voided or
corrected in AZ.
Elizabeth Holmes went from
being the youngest woman billionaire in the US to being on the outs. She settled with the Security and Exchange
Commission for $500,000 and gave up stock in the privately held company as well
as voting control. The government is not
finished however, there is a criminal investigation underway and the guest
implied there would be something resulting from that pretty soon. Today the company is virtually worthless and
the people who put up big bucks have only cold comfort of very large capital
losses to write off.
Ken from IL called and
asked “How did the FDA drop the ball?”
The author explained that Theranos, with its so-called proprietary
equipment squeezed between the cracks, that is, they fit into what he called a
“regulatory no-man’s land” between the Food and Drug Administration and the
Center for Medicare Services. What he
called “lab developed tests” were exempt from oversight by both agencies.
Over the past few years I recall seeing many
articles on Theranos in the Wall Street Journal but I confess I didn’t pay much
attention—probably because the company was not publicly traded. This
interview was interesting I think, and I will probably read the book if it
shows up at our local library. If anyone is interested in reading about
Holmes, here is a link to Business Insider:
Honey here; Great summary, Frankj! And a fascinating topic. Brinker mentioned that this kind of scam is fairly rare. He mentioned "Equity Funding" in 1970, and "Enron." But this one seems more egregious to me because it could have cost many lives - or so it appears.
THERANOS SCAM....For those interested in reading a bit more about this get-rich scam, Bloomberg article from March 2018.
TALKOFCONNECTICUT;
770KKOB;
http://710knus.com/;
TALKSTREAMLIVE
17 comments:
Test....
.
NOTE TO ALL
I have no idea what has happened to the comments on this blog.
They have all disappeared completely back to May 27th, so I cannot even republish them.
We know that Google is messing with the comments because we, along with lots of other blogs, stopped getting notifications of when they arrive.
I have posted a note to Google Help Forum, but have little hope of getting any help.
At this point, I can only hope that this is a one time occurrence.
If some of you will send comments so that I can publish and see if they remain posted, I would appreciate it.
Honey, I'm glad you're okay! I was starting to worry!
Happy to be a tester for you.
Well, let me start. Today is the third leg of the triple crown....The Belmont Stakes. I think the horse Justify will win. I wagered a $20 Trifecta with two long shots. Wish me food fortune.
Gabe
.
Thanks to Bluce, Stinky and Gabe for sending your "tests" so fast. Now it remains to be seen what happens.
Believe me, I am not pushing any "blonde" buttons that could cause this. :)
It's either a hacker or Google - and it is NO FUN!
Good to see the blog is functioning again, but puzzling what is going on. If a hacker is behind it is probably someone who knows a lot about computers, a lot about website construction, and someone who doesn't like any negative comments about Bob Brinker. Anyone we know? LOL
The stock market seems to be doing quite well and appears to be on its way to possible records highs, in spite of Brinker's constant talk about how trade wars led to The Great Depression.
Good to have you back Gabe. I hope you win your bet on Justify today. I'm no expert on horse flesh but I'm a bit concerned that Justify had to barely hang on to win the Preakness. I've seen several horses like that end up tiring and losing the Belmont but I hope I'm wrong this time.
LOL, I never knew that you WERE a blonde, Honey. Are you?
I've been away for a few days. I was surprised to see so few comments here until I read Honey's explanation.
Honey, you seem to be a political conservative and a Brinker BS buster. Therefore this blog could have been attacked by either Google or a Brinker sycophant who both have their reasons to hate you. I've seen too much to put it past such people.
Jim: Thank you. You are correct. It is a longer race.....One and a half mile race. There are some "fresh" horses running against him. I wagered $500 on exotic wagering with Justify into the mix with two long shots. We'll see what happens.
Sorry that HB is having these issues.
Gabe
Honeybee,
I noticed it was blank several days ago. I submitted a post (I think it was on Wed. or Thursday).
The post seemingly was accepted, i.e. I didn't get any error messages. Not sure if you received it? It was very short - "Honeybee are you OK", or "Honeybee are you there?" - (Something like that).
JC
PS: Maybe the geniuses up in Mountain View should rename the product "Booger".
.
Bluce….At least I used to be blonde before gray infiltrated. :)
.
MK….EXACTLY!
Honey, well at least you still HAVE hair. :(
Yeah, I'm wondering about all this monkey-business with your blog. Any feedback from other bloggers who've had similar problems?
That “attractive for purchase” opportunity is getting smaller and smaller in Bob’s rear view mirror.
We might see his 2900 sooner.
Keep on Honeybee.
Pavlov’s Cat
Gabe, congrats on your horse winning.
Natasha here
Thank you for your coverage this week
Post a Comment