Sunday, June 19, 2011

June 19, 2011, Bob Brinker's Moneytalk: Summary, Commentary and Excerpts

Posted June 19, 2011..........................[Post and Read Comments]

Brinker hosted Moneytalk today.  Bob Brinker did not host the program last week, June 12th.  Lynn Jimenez filled in last week..... 

STOCK MARKET: Bob Brinker did not mention the stock market today. The last time Brinker commented on the stock market was May 1st,  which was the last week  before the six week drop began.   At that time,  he reported that the Dow Jones Industrial Average had  closed the previous Friday at its 2011 high of 12,810, and that the  S&P 500 was  at its 2011 high of 1363.63 and was up 9% for the year.

Since then, the Dow has lost 810 points and the S&P 500 has lost close to 100 points and Brinker has said nothing about it.

BOND MARKET: No mention of  bond markets  today.     

FED MEETING THIS WEEK:  Brinker does not expect any change in interest rates. He expects the Fed Fund rate to remain zero to 0.25%. 

HOUSING MARKET:  Brinker thinks the best we can hope for is some leveling out. There needs to be a reduction in foreclosures and lower unemployment rates before there can be much improvement

WILL THE GOVERNMENT RAISE THE DEBT CEILING?  Brinker says they will because they do not have any choice. The only question is whether or not they will  have a temporary shut-down. It happened in 1994 and nobody lost any money on Treasuries.

* Caller Mark from Santa Cruz asked Brinker if there was any way to measure the lost opportunity cost of a failed investment. Brinker said that it could be measured against the "risk-free" 90-day Treasury Bill.  

Caller Mark from Santa Cruz followed up with this question:  "To be specific when you recommended buy the market in late 2007 before the financial collapse, I've held on since then and I'm still down about 14%. What's most frustrating to me, in this instance was  the inability to buy the market at S&P 900-950 as it went down there."  

Honey EC: Mark is absolutely right that Brinker recommended "buying the market" in  late 2007. He also recommended buying the market throughout the whole year of 2008!

Mark's "lost opportunity" based on his following Bob Brinker's advice is ENORMOUS. Mark made his point well that he was frustrated because he  did not have money available to buy after the market dropped because he had invested at the top on  Brinker's recommendations. 

Mr. Brinker may  have  a steady stream of "new money"  coming in,   but  that doesn't mean everyone does.  Mark clearly did not!  Brinker's  master word-smithing and clever double-talk behind that microphone can  certainly  fool most of the people most of the time,  but hopefully, some of the audience are informed enough to know the truth.   In my opinion, only a  two-bit snake oil salesman would insult Mark with this  answer instead of giving him an apology: 

Brinker's answer to Mark:  "The key here Mark, that in a situation like that, and certainly your buy level was most unfortunate, in a situation like that where you're making one buy and then  the market is 14% lower, you should have collected cash dividends along the way, I would say of about 7 or 8% along the way against that change in principle value. The key is that you did not make the mistake of selling out after the investment went down in value. Assuming it was a broad based investment, for example, like the S&P 500, there was no mistake by you in selling out. You've held the position it's come back and should be a few percentage points of break even.....So given what happened in 2008, looking at a finacial calamity where people thought the banking system was going under, when you look at the totality of what was going on out there, you held your position and came out of the situation and it's come back a long way, and I think you've done the right thing."


Honey EC: Brinker sold Mark the "investment letter" that contained what Brinker called "your buy level" which was "most unfortunate." Sickening response Mark actually lost over 57% in the bear that Brinker missed,  and now Brinker has the gall to tell him he's only down 14% four years later and should be happy with the dividends?! (Actually,  it's 18% as of Friday's close.)

  Brinker refuses to take any responsibility for the losses subscribers incurred because of his disastrous market-timing advice. And he adds insult to injury with his red-herring garbage about doing  "the right thing" by not selling at the bottom.

* Caller Kevin from Danville said: "Long time subscriber and I'm hoping Bob, that that S&P gets up into the 1450 range that you keep on talking about, but I'm a little concerned with this European crisis.....that this austerity programs that are going take place in Europe that they are going to impact mult-national companies and a lot of them are in the S&P, what do you think about that."   Brinker ignored Kevin's comment about the S&P 1450 range, and repeated his take on the Greece crisis, saying that its effect on the US will be small.  He thinks a Spain and Italy crisis would be much more important.

Honey EC: Kevin was right that for several months now, Brinker  has been predicting the S&P 500 Index will reach the 1400-1450 range, but he has changed the time frame each month -- moving it out. As of June, the time frame could be infinity.  See my quotes below.

And what irony that S&P mid-1400s is the exact number that Brinker called a gift-horse buying opportunity in 2007 and January 2008 (that Mark bought at then).......You can't make this stuff up. :)
February, 2011, Marketimer, Brinker said: "Since we expect the S&P 500 Index to trade into the 1350 to 1400 range later this year, all of our stock market model portfolios remain fully invested." 

In May, 2011, Marketimer, Brinker slightly revised that prediction to read "....low-to-mid 1400's range over the next 12 months."  

In June, Brinker did not mention any time frame, but instead said ".....1400s range as part of the ongoing cyclical bull marker trend."
WHAT IS ALAN GREENSPAN SMOKING?  Brinker said: "Let me say something about Alan Greenspan who was up late this week on his soapbox arguing that a default in Greece, which he seems thinks is pretty much inevitable, has the potential to cause a recession in the United States......When Alan Greenspan has occasionally done  something right, we've tried to give him credit for it. That doesn't happen much anymore because he has been blamed widely for contributing to the financial crisis of 2008 by keeping interest rates too low for too long......but when he got on his soapbox and started talking about a default in Greece causing a recession in the US, I really started to wonder what he is smoking."  

Bloomberg: "Greenspan Says Greece Default Almost Certain, May Trigger US Recession"

BOB BRINKER IN EUROPE FOR TWO WEEKS, JUST RETURNED HOME (Jimenez filled in for him on June 12th)  Brinker said: "I just returned from an extended stay in Europe the past couple of weeks and I can tell you, it's the only thing that anybody is talking about over there. It dominates the news coverage. It's dominates the conversation, and that is, the fiscal problems over there." 

BILDERBERG MEETING JUNE 9-12 IN SWITZERLAND:  What are Bilderbergs?  The meetings are conducted in secret. The world is expected to take their word about what is discussed  and even who  really attends. Their website contains a  of list participants, but it is suspected  that it is not complete.  The Guardian  reported that over 300 attended the 2011 meeting this year.

Honey EC: I highly recommend this article from the Guardian.  "Bilderberg 2011: The Tipping Point"Here are some excerpts:  "The global policy concerning the transparency of our social life is being thrashed out in an untransparent forum by people whose "social network" includes people like Henry Kissinger and the chairman of Goldman Sachs International. It also includes people we don't even know are there (this happens every year, names emerge that were never admitted to).

EUROPEAN UNION MEETING SUNDAY ABOUT GREEK DEBT CRISIS....Basically, Greece was  Brinker's  biggest  topic of the day.  (Everything he reported is readily available on the news.) Brinker said:  "Greece has become the poster boy for a welfare state. If you have any doubt about that, just look at those public sector union workers rioting in the streets of Athens as they protest these possible changes in their benefits."

IT'S NOT JUST GREECE:  Brinker said: "Right now it's Greece and certainly they're rioting in the streets in Greece. The workers who don't want to participate in this haircut have been rioting and they're very ugly scenes. But you know it's not just Greece. For example in Great Britain, they are going to have a strike with 750,000 participants. These are public sector workers.....Lot of public sector unions in Europe. That's one of the problems they have. They've developed huge public sector union situation, which gives people the power, basically, to take over the country -- shutting down schools, shutting down transit. You name it...... 

Wall Street Online: "Thousands of UK Public Sector Workers to Strike June 30th"

Brinker's guest-speaker today was Robert Kolb,  "Sovereign Debt: From Safety to Default"

Dixiegeezer has photographed parrots before, but I think this is spectacular. Click to enlarge:




Moneytalk on demand and to go with Bob Brinker, is available for FREE audio/podcasting at KGO810 radio for seven days after broadcast. I download and save all three hours, including the third hour guest-speaker. (The program is archived in the 1-4pm time-slots.) If you don't download it from KGO within seven day, it's available at bobbrinker.com by paid subscription. KGO Radio Sunday Archives


53 comments:

  1. Brinker only talks about the market when it is going up. Warning.

    All the time Brinker kissed Greenspan's butt when he was creating assets bubbles. Now Brinker is not happy when Greenspan is not blowing more hot air.

    Joey

    ReplyDelete
  2. Brinker can't put 2 and 2 together.

    The reason Europe is having financial problems is because they purchased U.S. housing debt that was packaged and sold off as Triple AAA CDOs.

    Now the Fed is buying them back with QE purchases.

    What until he figures out that those problems "over there" are going to land "over here".

    Joey

    ReplyDelete
  3. "The reason Europe is having financial problems is because they purchased U.S. housing debt that was packaged and sold off as Triple AAA CDOs.

    Now the Fed is buying them back with QE purchases."


    Can we see some support for that statement? A link perhaps?

    Oh, BTW I predict that Brinker will stop taking ANY calls from ANYBODY named Mark. I think they are all planted calls designed to embarrass rather than genuine questions.

    -Mark-

    ReplyDelete
  4. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/7521250.stm

    Link to the history of Europeans buying U.S. subprime debt that was rated Triple AAA.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Frankj:

    There was a time when BB could not say the name Greenspan, without adding "Maestro."

    Call screener this week gets a C- from BB, but a B+ from me. Realistically, once you are on the air you can ask anything -- I'm surprised more people don't do it.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anon AMAZINLY makes another excuse for the charlatan, and says I think they are all planted calls designed to embarrass rather than genuine questions.

    A guy loses his ass (still down 14% after 4 years) on a recommendation from Brinker, and asks him about it, and you call that a setup to embarrass?

    What is your rational for such an silly accusation?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous said...
    "The reason Europe is having financial problems is because they purchased U.S. housing debt that was packaged and sold off as Triple AAA CDOs.

    Now the Fed is buying them back with QE purchases."

    Can we see some support for that statement? A link perhaps?

    Mark

    Here are several links. The first is from the tax payer funded NPR.

    http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=89271724

    This one is from the NY Times.

    "BNP Paribas, the large French bank, said it had suspended operations of three funds because the deterioration of the U.S. mortgage market had made it impossible to value their underlying assets. It was the latest in a string of disclosures of losses or potential losses by funds and banks in Germany, France, and the Netherlands. And it confirms that the crisis, which began in the subprime segment of American home-loan market, has spread to the heart of Europe's financial markets."


    http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/09/business/worldbusiness/09iht-subprime.5.7062710.html

    As to QE2 money going to the European banks, here is a link.

    http://www.elliottwavemarketservice.com/2011/06/feds-ongoing-600b-stealth-bailout-of-foreign-banks/

    Mark, hope this helps.

    ReplyDelete
  8. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  9. During these years, I bailed out of the market in January 2000 when Bob advised us to, and stayed out until March 2003

    (1) Brinker was not out of the market.

    (2) Did you buy the QQQs?

    If you followed the QQQ advice then you lost everything and more from the Jan 2000 call. That QQQ recommendation is still underwater.

    Joey

    ReplyDelete
  10. a shill using half a dozen names to post here wrote (with the names changed to protect the innocent):

    "After reading this and other postings from people who exposed Madoff as a fraud, they all seem to have one thing in common: You apparently feel that you were not responsible for your own actions."

    How is asking a question or pointing out facts not taking responsibility?

    ReplyDelete
  11. "After reading this and other postings from you and Kirk L. and some others, you all seem to have one thing in common: You apparently feel that you were not responsible for your own actions."

    Right on das. And even to this day they measure from the market peak to the market bottom to prove how much a person LOST following Brinker.

    And then they toss out some imaginary number showing a person LOADED up on the QQQ trade and LOST even more.

    A person would have had to buy at the very TOP and sell at the very BOTTOM to actually lose as much money as these people show.

    I doubt that many people did that.

    -Mark-

    ReplyDelete
  12. "I call this the "Enron Syndrome", named after the anonymous person who testified during those hearings that they had lost all their 401K due their employer, Enron. It seems to me that if you have a multi-million dollar 401K you would have enough saved to hire competent investment advisors."

    Just like that Retired in Prescott poster who complained to a magazine that Brinker had "ruined" his retirement.

    Turned out to be a bogus claim and he retired right on schedule and to this day is still posting about his successful retirement without another peep about Brinker.

    -Mark-

    ReplyDelete
  13. June 20, 2011, 10:12 AM ET

    Dodd-Frank rules outlaw retail gold, silver trading?

    Forex.com has reportedly warned clients they will no longer be allowed to trade over-the-counter precious metals, including gold and silver under Dodd-Frank regulations taking effect next month.

    The e-mail was reported by ZeroHedge over the weekend and picked up by LeapRate.com.


    “As a result of the Dodd-Frank Act enacted by US Congress, a new regulation prohibiting US residents from trading over the counter precious metals, including gold and silver, will go into effect on Friday, July 15, 2011,” Forex.com wrote to clients.

    LeapRate notes that:


    The Forex.com message apparently stems from Forex.com’s interpretation of some of the Dodd-Frank rules which prohibit “…a transaction in any commodity with a person that is not an eligible contract participant or an eligible commercial entity, on a leveraged or margined basis.”

    -Tom Bemis

    http://blogs.marketwatch.com/thetell/2011/06/20/dodd-frank-rules-outlaw-retail-gold-silver-trading/

    ReplyDelete
  14. Anonymous said...
    "The reason Europe is having financial problems is because they purchased U.S. housing debt that was packaged and sold off as Triple AAA CDOs.

    Now the Fed is buying them back with QE purchases."

    Can we see some support for that statement? A link perhaps?

    Mark

    Here are several links. The first is from the tax payer funded NPR.

    http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=89271724

    This one is from the NY Times.

    "BNP Paribas, the large French bank, said it had suspended operations of three funds because the deterioration of the U.S. mortgage market had made it impossible to value their underlying assets. It was the latest in a string of disclosures of losses or potential losses by funds and banks in Germany, France, and the Netherlands. And it confirms that the crisis, which began in the subprime segment of American home-loan market, has spread to the heart of Europe's financial markets."


    http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/09/business/worldbusiness/09iht-subprime.5.7062710.html

    As to QE2 money going to the European banks, here is a link.

    http://www.elliottwavemarketservice.com/2011/06/feds-ongoing-600b-stealth-bailout-of-foreign-banks/

    Mark, hope this helps.

    ReplyDelete
  15. To dasfssdc:

    Au contraire. I believe participants to this blog do indeed hold themselves responsible for their actions. If only Mr B would be equally forthcoming as a market timer in explaining his bad calls as he does exulting past profitable advice.

    Of course if he did detail his mishaps to the listeners it may cost him future subscribers to the newsletter, and for the Brinker bottom line that would be............................................most unfortunate.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I'll be back later to answer all the comments, but right now, I want to tell dasfssdc that he is free to post opinions about me, but he will need to back up his accusations aimed at Kirk Lindstrom.

    I will give you until noon to post links/quotes to back up your claims about him or I will edit his name out of your post.

    Thanks in advance.

    .

    ReplyDelete
  17. dasfssdc apologizes for brinker saying:

    I don't blame Bob for any of my investment decisions.

    That's nice. Did somebody ask you?

    you all seem to have one thing in common:

    So do all of you

    I call this the "Enron Syndrome",

    That's nice. Did somebody ask you about Enron?

    I still subscribe to Bob's newsletter.

    Some people would call that another another poor decision.


    You sure could have gotten worse advice that what you received from Bob during this time frame.

    OR a hell of lot better, even from people on this BLOG, and for a lot less money.

    HTH, and your (sic) very welcome!

    ReplyDelete
  18. Peter Brimelow wrote about "Retired in Prescott" in CBS Marketwatch. Here is part of his article.

    "Shortly after I retired I got Bob's bulletin to put up to half my stock market funds into QQQ 'immediately.' I followed Bob's advice and it has ruined what should have been a wonderful retirement for me and my wife. We bought in at 82. What REALLY is unforgivable is that Brinker had NO EXIT STRATEGY for this horrendous trade. Even today he is still telling us to hold the QQQ (even though down 75 percent). Does he realize how many lives he's ruined?"

    To be fair, another correspondent says Brinker saved his retirement -- by getting him out of the market in 2000. But still...

    All of which leads me to four observations:

    1. Much of the Brinker brouhaha stems from things he's said on his ABC radio show or in the commentary section of his letter. Or allegedly said -- there's often total disagreement among my correspondents.

    Perhaps because of this, there's now a letter and a Web site, Begininvesting.com , devoted to monitoring Brinker's radio show.

    This of course underlines the wisdom of Mark Hulbert's decision to stick to monitoring Brinker's model portfolios. It was because Hulbert caught the fact that QQQ had not been put in Brinker's model portfolio published in the letter subsequent to the Special Alert that he sold it out, and didn't take any more loss. Quite obviously, most readers and listeners are not so systematic.

    2. But Brinker must realize his readers and listeners are not so systematic. In fact, notwithstanding the fine record of his model portfolios by Mark Hulbert's count, Brinker's behavior in this whole affair does seem odd. There's bitter disagreement about whether he provided the follow-up advice he promised. But what kind of a "counter-trend rally" is it that he's still holding QQQ for (outside his model portfolio, of course) after two years?

    3. Do not, repeat -- NOT -- gamble the rent money, much less the retirement money, on any market timer's recommendations. Only speculate with money you can afford to lose.

    4. If there are many more stories like my poor friend from Rochester, we're going to see massive re-regulation of the financial markets -- a repeat of the 1930s.

    ReplyDelete
  19. "That's nice. Did somebody ask you?"

    Entire post is nonsense argumentative gibberish.

    HTH

    Bob

    ReplyDelete
  20. Entire post is nonsense argumentative gibberish.

    I agree, which is why I replied to you in kind.

    Hope this Helps, and your (sic) welcome.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Does anyone have a list of Brinker's "Gift horse" buys for the market? Did he issue any in the 600s or 700s near when it bottomed?

    I remember he made a big deal of those in the 1990s when he called Intel "a good trading stock" and bragged about his big gains in Luuuuuuuuucent.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Honey -- I've been a listener to Bob Brinker for about the same amount of time that you have.

    During these years, I bailed out of the market in January 2000 when Bob advised us to, and stayed out until March 2003. I was glad for Bob's advice. I saved my rolled over 401K.

    I don't blame Bob for any of my investment decisions. I made/make those, and I don't depend on any one person's investment suggestions.

    After reading this and other postings from you and XXXXXX and some others, you all seem to have one thing in common: You apparently feel that you were not responsible for your own actions.

    I call this the "Enron Syndrome", named after the anonymous person who testified during those hearings that they had lost all their 401K due their employer, Enron. It seems to me that if you have a multi-million dollar 401K you would have enough saved to hire competent investment advisors.

    I still subscribe to Bob's newsletter. You sure could have gotten worse advice that what you received from Bob during this time frame.

    [Honey here: I edited a name out of this post because the accusations were not backed up with quotes or links.]

    ReplyDelete
  23. Bugging Bob Brinker

    By Peter Brimelow, CBS.MarketWatch.com
    NEW YORK (CBS.MW) -- ABC radio star Bob Brinker's Marketimer investment letter is one of the few letters to have beaten the stock market over the past 10 years, by Mark Hulbert's count. And Brinker actually turned bearish in January 2000 (right as the Dow peaked, 3,000 points higher than it is now -- remember? -- and the Nasdaq was at 5,000)

    So why do clouds of vengeful investors buzz around his noble head?

    Indeed, they buzz around anybody's head who says anything nice about Brinker. You should see the e-mail that Mark Hulbert gets. And he's just keeping count.

    Hell hath no fury like an investor steered wrong. Brinker is paying the price for his success, both in the markets and in attracting followers.

    And, it must be said, for a deviation from model portfolio discipline -- something the ruthless Hulbert monitoring machine doesn't permit.

    In this case, Mark's system worked in Brinker's favor, but it could easily have gone against him.

    This is the problem: Later in 2000, Brinker was trying to catch a rally in what he still regarded as a primary bear market.

    In a special bulletin, he suggested Nasdaq 100 Trust the Nasdaq 100 exchange-trade fund on the American Stock Exchange.

    But it did not appear in the detailed model portfolio published, as always, in the next month's letter . So Mark promptly sold out the QQQ position and no longer counted it.

    Which was just as well, because QQQ fell from above 80 to a recent 24. Brinker is still sweet on it, in this peculiar, extra-marital sort of way. But if it does rebound, Mark won't count that either -- unless Brinker explicitly puts it in his model portfolio.

    Why is Brinker doing this? It sounds odd, but it's not unprecedented. It's genuinely hard for advisers to compress all their intuitions into a model portfolio system.

    For example, right now Richard Russell is writing in Dow Theory Letters that this is probably a tradable stock market rally -- but that he, personally, isn't trading it. How do you assess that?

    Answer: Mark Hulbert has Russell in cash.

    The fury of Brinker's critics, however, is extraordinary and mounting. Maybe it's the shock of being burned by someone who had brought them good results. You don't see the same rage at Joe Granville, whose Granville Market Letter is down 99.6 percent in 22 years but is still going strong (so to speak).

    Or maybe -- I don't listen to radio - Brinker has an exceptionally irritating voice.

    Some Brinker critics seem to display considerable, if paranoid, scholarship. They have conspiratorial explanations as to why Brinker recommends specific stocks. They even claim that they have detected him participating in his own chat rooms under a pseudonym.

    But the beauty of Mark's method is that none of this matter. If an investment succeeds, it succeeds. And Brinker has succeeded.

    In his model portfolios, at least. But many subscribers obviously read Brinker's commentary, which is less precise (probably unfortunately). Which is why Mark's method focuses on model portfolios.

    Moral for Brinkerbuffs: do what he does, not what he says.

    Right now, Brinker still sees a primary bear market. He's only 35 percent in stocks

    Not counting the QQQ, of course.

    Bob


    http://www.marketwatch.com/story/bugging-bob-brinker

    ReplyDelete
  24. Call screener this week gets a C- from BB, but a B+ from me. Realistically, once you are on the air you can ask anything -- I'm surprised more people don't do it.
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    Actually it is hard to do. All shows have a delay built into to them. The duration of that delay is up to the station. This gives the operations mgr and host a great deal of latitude in terms of what you actually hear on the airwaves. I am pleasantly surprised this one got through. Maybe Brinker had a change of heart and wants to operate on the up and up.

    tfb

    ReplyDelete
  25. Excuse me, Bob, but that was a great article by Peter Brimelow. Problem is, it was written on:

    Aug. 15, 2002, 12:02 a.m. EDT
    Bugging Bob Brinker


    However, it does prove what I have said ever since I wrote to Mark Hulbert and he basically LIED to me, just as he lies in his footnote about Brinker deciding AT THE TIME he sent the Buy-QQQ Bulletin that he would not add the trade to his model portfolios. Here is what Brimelow said once again:

    "This is the problem: Later in 2000, Brinker was trying to catch a rally in what he still regarded as a primary bear market.

    In a special bulletin, he suggested Nasdaq 100 Trust QQQ -0.02% , the Nasdaq 100 exchange-trade fund on the American Stock Exchange.

    But it did not appear in the detailed model portfolio published, as always, in the next month's letter . So Mark promptly sold out the QQQ position and no longer counted it.

    Which was just as well, because QQQ fell from above 80 to a recent 24. Brinker is still sweet on it, in this peculiar, extra-marital sort of way. But if it does rebound, Mark won't count that either -- unless Brinker explicitly puts it in his model portfolio."


    Again: "so Mark promptly sold out the position and did not count it"!!!!!!!!!!

    Therefore, Bob Brinker's Hulbert Financial Digest ranking is FALSE! Hulbert would have known at the time he read the bulletin instead of the next month, when we all found out.

    Hulbert initially made the logical conclusion based on the fact that the bulletin said to USE CASH RESERVES raised from the model portfolios.

    Marketwatch:Bugging Bob Brinker

    .

    ReplyDelete
  26. Joey,

    I agree with you that Bob Brinker used to kiss up to Alan Greenspan sometimes, but he stopped after Greenspan left the Fed Chair office, but didn't keep his mouth shut.

    Brinker used to whine about him not knowing when to exit the stage, and said he should be satisfied with all the "gifts" life had given him.

    Do you remember that?

    .

    ReplyDelete
  27. Joey,

    I think the main reason Greece and other European countries are having financial problems is the same reason that the United States is going to have the same problems.

    To many unsustainable giveaways to deadbeats, and too many larger-than-the-private-sector, public employee pensions and perks.

    This morning, I heard Rush Limbaugh report that in San Francisco, retired public employees are getting pensions roughly twice the salary of private-sector workers who are footing the bills. I happen to believe that occurs statewide here in California.

    It is unsustainable -- the taxpayers are going to revolt. And all that COMMIE-KOOK Jerry Brown can do is try to figure out ways to illegally raise taxes.

    What kind of morons voted that crazy hippy back into office to put the finishing nail in California's coffin?
    .

    ReplyDelete
  28. Mark said: "Oh, BTW I predict that Brinker will stop taking ANY calls from ANYBODY named Mark. I think they are all planted calls designed to embarrass rather than genuine questions."

    Well, Mark,

    If you call Moneytalk, better use your middle name, unless that is Mark too. LOL!

    But you seem to be sympathizing with Bob Brinker rather than his victim, or am I misunderstanding you?

    Surely, you don't think it is wrong to tell the truth about Brinker's well-hidden, but costly-to-subscribers mistakes.

    Surely, you think Brinker would actually show some integrity if he would be transparent and honest about his advice -- for a change.

    Or are you concerned that all those Moneytalk ads for Marketimer might not be quite so appealing to the masses if he was truthful about what was in prior issues of it?
    .

    ReplyDelete
  29. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Bob,

    Baloney! The only reason our state hasn't gone over the cliff completely is because the Republicans have tried to block all the ILLEGAL tax increases.

    .

    ReplyDelete
  31. Mr Pig asked Mark: "A guy loses his ass (still down 14% after 4 years) on a recommendation from Brinker, and asks him about it, and you call that a setup to embarrass?

    What is your rational for such an silly accusation?"



    Mr Pig,

    I will be watching for your answer to that good question, along with a few of my own that I added.

    .

    ReplyDelete
  32. Joey said to dasffssdc: "During these years, I bailed out of the market in January 2000 when Bob advised us to, and stayed out until March 2003

    (1) Brinker was not out of the market.

    (2) Did you buy the QQQs?

    If you followed the QQQ advice then you lost everything and more from the Jan 2000 call. That QQQ recommendation is still underwater.


    Joey,

    BINGO! That is exactly right. And I'd also like to know what daf-etc did in 2008-2009 as Bob Brinker recommended keeping every stock market dime fully invested by dollar-cost-averaging and several outright buys during the whole bear market.

    .

    ReplyDelete
  33. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  34. (((ROAR)))

    We got us a SHILL trying to pass off a ten year old article as current, and an attempt earlier under another alias, to talk (LIE) about Retired in Prescott.

    NOONE can make this crap up.

    I hope you are paying attention Dija......it's like old times again.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Birdbrain said: "To dasfssdc:

    Au contraire. I believe participants to this blog do indeed hold themselves responsible for their actions. If only Mr B would be equally forthcoming as a market timer in explaining his bad calls as he does exulting past profitable advice.

    Of course if he did detail his mishaps to the listeners it may cost him future subscribers to the newsletter, and for the Brinker bottom line that would be............................................most unfortunate."



    Thank you, Birdbrain,

    If I had a dime for every time that I have said that I make my own financial decisions, I'd be rich. :)

    And I think that I've also been clear that I do not follow any of Bob Brinker's advice, so it would be ridiculous to hold him responsible for my own "mishaps," such as being way too early to short bonds.... LOL!

    I often discuss my own investments, but I always make it clear that they are mine alone -- nothing to do with Brinker.

    I also make it clear that I often change my mind on a dime -- like I did with Suncor (BTW: it's looking interesting again down at $37.72).

    Anything I post is strictly my own thoughts, intended to be informational and (I hope) entertaining.

    And I sell nothing, except FrankJ and I publish the Bag and Bulb Investment Letter, and you're our spokesman. :)

    .

    ReplyDelete
  36. "We got us a SHILL trying to pass off a ten year old article as current, and an attempt earlier under another alias, to talk (LIE) about Retired in Prescott."

    Not trying to pass anything off pig.

    But the topic here seems to be bashing Brinker and going way..way...way back to do it.

    As long was there was talk about Brinker's QQQ call and calling the bear market I though I would just dredge up the same old crap too.

    As I recall, you followed Brinker's advice on the QQQ trade and lost some money.

    I didn't think you would still carry a grudge after all these years though. Get over it.

    Bob

    ReplyDelete
  37. Bob claimed:

    "California is nowhere near the top of the list in terms of total taxes collected but the tax whiners who aren't even employed would have you believe they are right at the top."

    Right California is at the very top. It is so far ahead of other states that you can combine numbers 2 and 3 (New York and Texas) and their total is barely larger than California.

    http://www.census.gov/govs/statetax/09staxrank.html

    ReplyDelete
  38. Jeffchristie,

    Here is your link that proves California is bleeding taxpayers to death:

    State Tax.Gov

    .

    ReplyDelete
  39. I didn't think you would still carry a grudge after all these years though. Get over it.

    I see. You haven't seemed to get over it, since you are still posting the same old crap for almost 20 years now. That's some grudge that you are holding.

    Why do you give advice to other people that you can't follow yourself?


    The Republicans got California into its mess starting with that addle-brained Alzheimer puppet Reagan.

    That's not a very nice statement. It sounds a little nasty and opinionated.

    I don't think you are a very nice person, under any of your dopey ID's.

    ReplyDelete
  40. TFB said: "All shows have a delay built into to them. The duration of that delay is up to the station. This gives the operations mgr and host a great deal of latitude in terms of what you actually hear on the airwaves. I am pleasantly surprised this one got through. Maybe Brinker had a change of heart and wants to operate on the up and up.

    TFB,

    Thanks for that info about how the callers are on delay. I think that Sunday when Mark asked his question, it got through since it was basically a follow up to his opening question.

    The way it happened, Brinker did cut him off as soon as he realized where he was going with it.

    And I can't agree that Brinker has turned over a new leaf because of the scummy way he responded to Mark.

    I betcha a lunch on the Wharf that Brinker will never "operate on the up and up." He never has, and never will. It's for the "young sprouts" you know... :)

    .

    ReplyDelete
  41. Glue Factory said: "Does anyone have a list of Brinker's "Gift horse" buys for the market? Did he issue any in the 600s or 700s near when it bottomed?

    I remember he made a big deal of those in the 1990s when he called Intel "a good trading stock" and bragged about his big gains in Luuuuuuuuucent."


    Glue Factory,

    LOL!!! I love your handle! Yes,I know all of Bob Brinker's buy signals back to year 2000.

    Unfortunately, I was still drinking the Brinker Kool-Aid in the 1990's. :)

    I will see what I can find out about Lucent.


    The last buy-signal that Brinker issued in this latest bear market was in February, 2009 at S&P 500 Index "low-to-mid 800's.

    Of course, the S&P dropped another 150 points before it bottomed in March.

    Did you want more information about his buy-signals?

    .

    ReplyDelete
  42. I betcha a lunch on the Wharf that

    Can I bring my wife? I know you have this reputation for seducing impressionable young men...well I need to protect myself from the claws of the feline :)

    LOL!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  43. And I can't agree that Brinker has turned over a new leaf because of the scummy way he responded to Mark.

    Well every year I still put out my stocking, waiting for Santa.

    Besides a Christmas Carol is my favorite movie(s); so I have faith in redemption... :)

    ReplyDelete
  44. (I'm assuming) TFB asked: "Can I bring my wife? I know you have this reputation for seducing impressionable young men...well I need to protect myself from the claws of the feline :)

    LOL!!!!!"



    Sure....and I promise not to purr too close to you.....ROFLOL!!!

    .

    ReplyDelete
  45. (I'm assuming) TFB asked:

    Yes it was I...

    You hottie you...

    tfb

    ReplyDelete
  46. NLY declared a Q2 dividend of $0.65, payable on July 28th, for holders on ex-dividend date, June 30th.

    The NAV is very near the 52-week ATH, but is still paying nearly 14% dividend. The NAV will drop on ex-dividend date....

    Disclaimer: I own NLY right now. :)

    .

    ReplyDelete
  47. I have never traded options, and not sure I really understand them.

    Todd Johnson (at Seeking Alpha) has written a lengthy but simple explanation about how to use them to hedge mortgage REITS. Excerpts:

    "Mortgage REIT (MREIT) investors can utilize equity-options to provide downside protection on the common stock price. We can explore option strategies to provide an ideal risk and reward equation for your personal circumstances. Every investor has a specified risk tolerance, and options can mitigate a certain degree of MREIT common share risk.

    If you want to explore the option world, I highly recommend the book, "Options as a Strategic Investment," by Lawrence G. McMillan. This is a must-own book to fully understand the option world. I'll discuss a few basic option terms and how to implement these strategies in the MREIT equity space.

    There are two basic option types: calls and puts. Calls represent the right to buy 100-shares of a security [eg, Microsoft (MSFT)] at a predetermined strike price (eg, $25 per share). This contract is in effect through the expiration date, which could be from one-day in duration to three years in duration. A "naked call" represents owning only the call option. Selling a "covered call" requires owning the stock and selling a call against the long common stock position."


    Read more:

    Hedging Mortgage REITs With Options

    .

    ReplyDelete
  48. Actually the ex-dividend date for NLY is June 28...not the 30th.

    And it's not really a mortgage REIT in the usual sense. NLY borrows money to buy mortgage backed securities and is highly leveraged. Called carry trade.

    Not so good when rates go back up again.

    NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Jun. 20, 2011-- The Board of Directors of Annaly Capital Management, Inc.
    (NYSE: NLY) declared the second quarter 2011 common stock cash dividend of $0.65 per common share.

    This dividend is payable July 28, 2011 to common shareholders of record on June 30, 2011. The ex-dividend date is June 28, 2011.

    Ann A. Lee

    ReplyDelete
  49. The callousness of Mr B's answer to his first caller on Sunday had me wondering, what if he had taken up another career....

    Attorney at law Robert J Brinker

    Client: But, Mr Brinker, you promised this testimony would win the case. As a result, I'm ruined!
    RJB: That decision was most unfortunate.

    Cardiologist Robert J Brinker:

    Son of patient: Your procedure caused massive trauma and multiple complications. My mother is back in critical condition!
    RJB: The procedure that you approved was most unfortunate.

    And so on...

    ReplyDelete
  50. Mr Pig said: "I hope you are paying attention Dija......it's like old times again."

    LOL Mr Pig....Thanks for reminding us of our old friend, Dija/Octavian. As far as Brinker-bots go, he was in a class all by himself.

    Funny how so many who often rode on his coattails disappeared when he unexpectedly died a few years ago.

    I often wonder how it could be that "Math Junkie" and "Queenofquibble" and even "Libertypilgrim" all disappeared nearly at the same time.

    I will say this about Dija, no one has ever been able to defend Bob Brinker's shenanigans like he did.

    .

    ReplyDelete
  51. After listening to the replay of Mr B's first caller on Sunday, what if Robert J Brinker had taken other career paths?

    Client: But Mr Brinker, you promised this testimony would win the case. As a result, I'm ruined!
    Attorney RJB: The decision by the jury was most unfortunate.

    Son of patient: Your procedure caused massive trauma and multiple complications. My mother is in critical condition!
    Surgeon RJB: The results from the procedure which you approved were most unfortunate.

    He may be on to something. From now on when confronted about a mistake I will admit neither blame nor guilt, simply shrug my shoulders and repeat the magic catchphrase. Let you know how that works out.

    ReplyDelete
  52. just got bb free newsletter what a pitch talks about his great advice blah blah blah then his great 2000 call NO 2007 2008 2009 oh come on !!! the biggest bear in a lifetime like it didn't happen ..........somebody post that thing it's funnier than larry the cable guy

    ReplyDelete
  53. love the mark call you see how simple it is now that it's over may i suggest the recomended reading list. i heard the news letter comes with a free jar of vasoline Mark should't worry it's allright bob was still able to get to europe for a little rr maybe he and bono were able to save the whales

    ReplyDelete