Saturday, June 9, 2018

June 10, 2018, Bob Brinker's Moneytalk: Stocks, Bonds, Economy and Investing

June 10, 2018….Bob Brinker's Moneytalk....(comments welcome)

ADDED From Hour One   dRahme:  AUDIO CLIP.... FED winding, unwinding, CPI, Tariffs, Interest Rates

Honey was doing a handbell and choir concert Sunday, but Frankj has done a complete 3-hour summary of Moneytalk.

FRANKJ WROTE: 


Moneytalk June 10, 2018
First hour

Bob’s first hour monologue focused on what the Fed has been up to.  He expects another FOMC interest rate increase of 25 basis points this coming week.  This will bring the short term (overnight) rate up to a range of 1.75 to 2.00%.   He speculated that there will be two additional increases in 2018.   These raises pose a headwind for stock prices as people sell securities and move funds to fixed income. 

Bob reviewed the gyrations that the Fed went though, going back to the Great Recession.  First they lowered short term interest rates to near zero.  Then they launched the quantitative easing program, buying Treasury notes, bills, and bonds.  QE was designed to create liquidity and (hopefully) stimulate the economy, especially the housing sector. 

Last year the Fed announced they’re reversing course and will be quantitatively tightening.  They’ll sell those treasury securities now on their books at an annual rate of $600 billion per year.   At the same time they’re raising interest rates as mentioned above. 

So, all this is a review for Moneytalk regulars but might be useful to those who are just now discovering the show. 

Despite all the talk about tariffs and trade wars, they really haven’t taken place.  The market is jumping up and down in response to the talk.  The actual tariffs in place represent a tiny fraction of the overall amount of trade.  He referred to the market as “trendless,”  and this was about his only reference to the market.
He gave out the toll free number at the end of the monologue which has become the norm lately.
·         Headwinds for preferred stocks:  Ron from St. Mary’s GA is in the land of critical mass, invested in Portfolio 3.  He asked Bob about putting some separate money in preferred stocks.  Bob cautioned him pointing out that the payout is fixed, making them bond-similar.  As such they’ll be subject to headwinds caused by rising interest rates.

·         A refinance question:  John in Crown Point, IN has an adjustable rate mortgage which is pegged to a short term rate he expects to go up.   He wanted to know what he should do, hang on, pay off, etc.   Turns out he has a net worth of $ 4 MILLION.   Bob said “the amount of the mortgage represents a tiny part of your net worth.” Implication:  it doesn’t matter what you do.  John then praised Bob for his past advice about 529 programs and how his grandkids are benefitting citing some dollar figures.  One wonders what was the real purpose of the call?

·         Short term interest rates:  Johnny called in from El Paso, TX on a scratchy phone line.  He’s having angst over the rates he’s getting on fixed income investments.  Bob told him to watch what the Fed does.  He said “normal” 10 year rates ought to be about equal to real GDP plus inflation.
I think we originally heard this in a 3rd hour interview with the guy who runs the Doubleline funds.   

Bob said, if GDP is 3% and inflation 2% then the ten year rate ought to be about 5%.  The 10 year rate is now at about 3%.

·         Stick with stocks and roll the dice?  John from Lake City, FL seemed to be seeking Bob’s blessing on his 85/15 stock/bond allocation.   I didn’t get his age but he is still working and expects to live a long time yet.  Bob basically wished him well, acknowledging that John seemed to understand the risks associated with his allocation.

·         Worried about your junk bond fund?  Keep an eye on small cap stocks.  Who knew?  Bob told Fred in El Paso that just as credit markets affect junk bond funds, so too do they affect small cap stocks.  When the credit environment is friendly small caps do well and they are doing well right now.  But… Bob cautioned that this can change quickly.  
2nd hour
Bob pointed out the grim projections for Medicare and Social Security.  Medicare funding is slated to run out in 2026, three years sooner than previously estimated.  Social Security is doing a little better with 2034 as a critical date.   Together, both programs account for 40% of federal government spending.   Bob that solving the fiscal problems of these two programs is one of the major issues facing Congress but given the level of partisanship in Washington DC no one is addressing them.  

ADDED....dRahme AUDIO CLIP....Medicare and Social Security (Honey wrote some personal EC's in the comments section here. 

·         529 plans.  Jennifer in Sacramento better adjust the allocation in the 529 plan devoted to her 16 year old grandchild since he’s only 2 years from college.  Then do the same as the other four approach college age.  

·         Don’t pay back that loan!   Dennis, a government employee is about to retire.  He borrowed from his retirement account years ago and has not paid it back.  With interest he owes $97K and the gov’t says if he doesn’t pay it back they’ll dock his pension by $8400 per year.  What should he do?   Bob did some ciphering and told him not to pay it back, take the hit on the monthly checks.  

·         Is that $250 or $250,000?   Jim has $250K in two different banks in Bend, OR.  He needs to find a home for another $500K when he sells a house soon.  (Nice problem to have).   Bob told him to put it in Vanguard’s Prime money market fund and earn about 2% with check writing at a minimum of “two-fifty.”   The caller asked if that was $250 or $250,000?   A good question for the MoneyTalk Final Exam.

·         Three great fears.   Bob answered John in Michigan’s question:  1)  that the Fed will make a mistake; 2) that inflation will heat up in light of the tight labor market; 3) growing protectionism.

·         Vanguard gets the nod again.   Mark in Virginia Beach:  take the $160K sitting in your bank earning practically nothing and stick it in Vanguard’s Prime Money Market, or build a CD ladder.

·         Risk averse in Nevada.   Tessa has some money from a home sale and she doesn’t want to risk it in stocks.  She said she has a 403B account that she’s had for 30 years and asked if she should put it in there since it has earned 4.5% per year, steadily.  

This was a strange call, I thought.  Bob did not at first pick up on the fact of this 403B.  It was not clear whether she was still working and it wasn’t clear that she could contribute “outside” money from the sale of a house into a 403B account.   This is what he seemed to be telling her to do.  

·         Shark attack on Virginia Beach.  A financially secure, 85 year old woman was the victim of a shark attack.  This shark didn’t have fins or teeth but was seen departing the scene of the attack with a signed, Whole Life insurance contract and check in his briefcase.   A male friend of the woman reported the attack to Bob who was on duty in the lifeguard stand.  Bob advised him to contact the shark and see about unwinding the sale before reporting the incident to the insurance commissioner.

·         A first for MoneyTalk?   Have we ever had a lottery winner asking advice?   Warren and his wife won a $5 million jackpot in Flint, MI.  After taxes they are looking at $2.4 million.  Warren seemed to be saying they were ok financially before the win and now they were sitting on a total of $4.5 million.   He wanted to know what he should do in light of future federal estate tax changes. 

Warren mentioned gifting, setting up a foundation and having various advisors in the background (which sounds scary).  Bob said no one has a crystal ball with regard to estate taxes.  They seem to change with whichever party is in control in DC.  The current exemption is $11,200 for individuals and double that for married couples, so Warren and his wife are OK, for now.
ADDED...Thanks to  dRahme AUDIO CLIP: The Week Ahead

3rd Hour interview
Jacques Peretti, a journalist from London was the interviewee on the third hour of the June 10, 2018 edition of MoneyTalk.   Like most guests he wrote a book.   The title is:  “The Deals that Made the World.”  The subtitle is … annoying.  You’ll have to look it up yourself.

Ostensibly, the book is about deals that transformed different industries.  The interview consisted of him giving examples from the book and Bob’s questioning him about the state of affairs in the UK regarding Brexit.

Bullet points only (and not because I’m exhausted from the first two hours, I’m not, but this interview just wasn’t that interesting).

·         Pharma:  a Merck CEO in the 70’s told other pharma CEOs that the future is in treating the “well” not the sick.  So as a result, we have lots of preventative drugs (statins for example).   Treating the “well” widens the net of people that want/need prescriptions for what ails them. 

·         It was Great Britain that invented the off-shoring of business to the Cayman Islands for tax purposes.  They did this to invigorate their own economy. 

·         Robots:   All jobs fit into one of the following categories:  Cognitive/Manual;  Cognitive/Non Manual;  Non-cognitive/Manual;  Non-cognitive/Non Manual.  Robots will someday take over 3 ½ of these classifications.  

·         Peter Theil and Elon Musk were principals at Paypal before selling it to eBay.  Paypal was a monetization of the internet.  Theil and Musk became aware of some brain research that revealed a “flinch response – i.e. neural pain,  when someone making a purchase handed over the money.  Brain scans apparently documented this very slight hesitation.   

They should do a scan on my spouse, I don’t think any such flinch response exists with my darling wife.

So, if the payment could be handed over with the click of a mouse,  people would spend faster and more often.  And Paypal was off to the races.  

·         Planned obsolescence:  There is a light bulb in Livermore, CA that has been burning continuously for 115 years.  Lightbulbs were originally designed to last a very long time.  In the 1930’s makers of bulbs and other equipment decided to “fix” this problem.

·         There was mention of a Japanese researcher who was messing around with extracts from corn, trying to make an adhesive.  He had some extract on his fingers, licked them and it tasted sweet.  The extract led to corn syrup, something that is hard to avoid in many types of food today.  Good thing it wasn’t the precursor to Super Glue he had on his fingers. 

·         Some guy from MetLife messed with the Body Mass Index tables in such a way to make more people appear to be obese according to the tables.  This prompted a diet craze in this country. 

·         Finally Brexit:  the liberal elites, about 10% of the population are in a panic over it.  Another 10-15% are hard line in favor of it and wonder why GB hasn’t done it long before.  The rest don’t care and are tired of hearing about it.  They’re more worried about wages and crime in London which is at an all-time high.
Bob wrapped up the interview at about 3:50.

Honey here: Frankj, thank you so much for coming to my rescue with that fabulous, educational, summary of Moneytalk today!

TALKOFCONNECTICUT; 
770KKOB;  
http://710knus.com/
TALKSTREAMLIVE

76 comments:

Pavlov's Cat said...


That “attractive for purchase” opportunity is getting smaller and smaller in Bob’s rear view mirror. We might see his 2900 sooner. Keep on Honeybee.

Pavlov’s Cat

Anonymous said...

US stock funds are on track for a third consecutive month of outflows.
Since the beginning of February, $72 billion has been pulled from US stock funds. Recently, it extended to index products as well.

March was the second consecutive month to see outflows in passive US equity funds.
According to Morningstar, the iShares core S&P 500 (IVV) and the SPDR S&P 500 (SPY) were the two main passive funds to see outflows in March, amounting to $9.7 billion and $15 billion, respectively.

Ben Jacobs

Rob said...

For the hardworking California taxpayers out here in HoneyBee land, this will probably disgust you. All of these people that were renting these craftsman style homes far below fair market value for decades, have now won the lottery at the tax payers expense. Million dollar plus homes in South Pasadena and Millionaire row area of Pasadena for a mere 150K........ As a taxpayer I’m disgusted by this nonsense. CA socialism at its best!!

For those of you not familiar with these areas, the City of South Pasadena School District receives 10 out of 10 on every public school in the city. People are renting garages for 2,000 a month to have their kids in the school district. As for the Pasadena homes these are near millionaire row where the Rose Parade begins and is adjacent to “Old Town Pasadena” and even small condos are going for 600K. Rob

https://www.pasadenastarnews.com/2018/06/08/in-the-path-of-the-710-freeway-6-residents-buy-their-homes-as-caltrans-releases-excess-properties-to-tenants/

Anonymous said...

Cash is where it’s at baby.
Living in those wonderful capital gains.
Smart

Greta Schmitzer

Unknown said...

Ben Jacobs-

The outflows you mention in both IVV and SPY in March represent 5.3% of each fund, respectively. As for the month of March regarding SPY and IVV activity it should not be a surprise. Guess I am not sure of your point.

Morningstar also ran an article about Passive Funds outflows heading to Active Funds.

And, another article about Passive Fund outflows heading to Gold. (I laughed)



MK said...

I have rebalanced two or three times this year out of equities into cash and short term bonds. So count me among that demographic.

tfb said...

Just as an FYI, I actually had trouble finding this forum. Normally I type "Honeybee Bob Brinker' into a search engine (ixquick, duckduckgo, or statrpage) and up it pops. Today it took a bit of digging.

You may need to adjust your metatags.

tfb

Anonymous said...

Bob can't even get himself to say the words "President Trump." I caught him referring to The President as "the individual who is in charge now."
Last month I heard him ask (paraphrasing0 can this electorate ever vote for a President with any economic knowledge?" The Atlanta Fed guessed we might see 4.8% GDP growth in the second quarter. But Bob acts like we are stuck in the mud.

Jim said...

I was really surprised by some of Brinker's comments today. After talking for weeks about how terrible the aluminum and steel tariffs are, how tariffs led to the Great Depression, and implying that Trump has us on the verge of a trade war Brinker said today that we are not anywhere near a trade war, that aluminum and steel make up only a small percentage of trade, and finally that the media is blowing the trade war fears out of proportion. Brinker is part of the media and I would say that he was guilty of blowing the trade war fears out of proportion. He probably scared a few of his listeners in recent months by trying to imply that Trump is leading us into a trade war that could cause another depression and stock market collapse. Now today he acted like what has happened so far is no big deal. Bob Brinker today sure didn't sound like the Bob Brinker of the past few months IMO.

Roger Clear, Hoffman Estates said...

I think the Atlanta Fed is drinking too much coffee. 4.8%? Gimme a break. Is that an annualized rate or just a y-o-y comparison?

Rob was scratching the surface about something. Is "10 out of 10" bad or good, Rob? Please give us some perspective, sir.

Pasadena should be a case study for the World Dumb-Ass Organization, leftists especially. Newly wealthy Chinese from China (really?) are fleeing their homeland with their wealth because they fear a "clawing back" of their gains by the communist government.

Their gains were earned when the highly-controlling centralized gov. loosened the tight grip of the bureaucracy a little in order to spark some capitalism, just to see what would happen, similar to lighting a firecracker in your hand but not tossing it. It explodes.

So now the immigrants have taken a liking to the SoCal. weather and the panoramic view of the San Gabriel mountains in Pasadena and have spent their wealth on tearing down the existing 1940's cubicle bungalows and have rebuilt upon the pleasant streets and lanes with McMansion-style homes (make it a double, please) and are living in bliss, all the while sending their kids to school.

Whichever school superintendent is responsible for getting good educational results (just guessing, Rob) should be lauded and made into celebrity.

If Rob's stats say he's a deadbeat then fire him and I'll wash away his tears with free drinks at Madame Wong's in Chinatown, a great blues music venue during the 1980's.

The point is, an influx of wealth usually brings nicer homes and better schools. What's not to like, except the added traffic?

Honeybee said...

.
TFB...Thanks for the tip. I will check the metatags - although I'm not certain what they are...

Honeybee said...

.
Jim....Interesting that Brinker has changed his tune about the so-called trade wars.

IMO, Brinker reads his son's Twitter feed far too much. Not that I can read it - he blocked me right out of the gate, but ve haf vays of reading occasionally.

Those Russian spies are everywhere.....LOL!

Honeybee said...

.
Note to Anonymous....I did not believe you were one of the dozens of "anonymouses" who send comments to the blog - that immediately are trashed.

But please use a handle if you want to make more comments.

Honeybee said...

test

Anonymous said...

Has Bob commented recently in how US oil exports have risen dramatically since 2016?
In 1998-2003, I recall hearing Bob harp weekly about how damaging to the economy it was to import millions of barrels of oil each week. But now that tide has turned sharply. Yet I cannot recall any comments on this great news. Did I miss something?

burt said...

I saw Frank posted this, " Bob’s blessing on his 85/25 stock/bond allocation. " Isn't that more than 100%?

Honeybee said...

.
John....Nope you didn't miss anything. Brinker has made no mention of the fact that the U.S. is no longer "dependent for oil on countries that hate us."

He used to "sound an alarm" about that weekly - just as you said.

He also talked about the Keystone Pipeline, and I think he mentioned Anwar a few times, but now that President Trump has them operating, not a word.

frankj said...

Good catch by Burt. At least one person read the summary! Yes, typo, that guy's allocation was 85/15.

Bluce said...

frankj: I always read the front page, but sometimes I just "skim", depending on the subject. I must have "skimmed" over those numbers.

Diogene505 said...

Brinker talks about dollar cost averaging into the market now but I have never heard him say for how long. Let's say I have a $100K to invest in the stock market. Does anyone on this forum know of a rule of thumb for when to make the buys? For example $10K per month until fully invested? Is there any benefit to doing so more or less frequently? If it is long term money that is 20 plus years why not just plow it into VTI and be done with it. I realize if there is a market "correction" of -50% following my investment that would be gut wrenching. Has anyone seen any hypotheticals where DCA is actually better than a lump sum investment?
Thanks

Honeybee said...

.
TFB and all, I changed the Meta Tags, so hope that will help with searches. I know that all one needs for a Google search is "Honey Brinker."

I know that he must love that, especially when I come in above Jr.....LOL!

Honeybee said...

.
Diogene505....Others may have seen something different, but all of the hypotheticals and statistics that I have seen regarding dollar-cost-averaging, show that lump sum is better performance-wise.

The advantage of dollar-cost-averaging (according to what I have read) is only psychological.

IOW: as you pointed out, a 50% drop right after you put your money in the stock market would be "gut wrenching."

But remember this, even Brinker's special "attractive for purchase" buy-signals are wrong more than 50% of the time.

He actually called the S&P mid-1400's a "gift horse buying opportunity" at the top in 2008 just before it dropped 57% - down to the bottom in March 2009 at 677.

Too bad he didn't call the February 2018 low a buy-signal. Money has been made since then, but he's still waiting for that retest this year. No matter when it comes, he'll call it a retest of that low.

Bluce said...

Diogene: In addition to Honey's excellent comments, always keep Murphy's Law in focus.

If you lump it in, the market will tank the next day. If you divvy it up into, say, twelve lumps, one per month, the market will skyrocket the next day and continue upwards. And you'll have mostly cash during that time.

DCA is, to some degree, market timing.

Maybe lump half of it in, and DCA the rest in over 6 - 12 months . . . ?

Jerrod Clarkson said...

Honeybee,

I'm not certain the search problem was Meta Tags, but it can't hurt to review and update them.

I think it could have been due to the fact that your blog showed zero activity for a number of days, and therefore was temporarily "down-ranked" in the web search results. The published (then disappeared) comments were not helpful either.


JC

PS: were you able to find out why the comments page was wiped out? Did other bloggers have similar problems?

Honeybee said...

.
Jerrod...Unfortunately I have not gotten an answer yet about the disappearing comments.

I'm keeping my fingers crossed that it doesn't happen again.

I think I'll change my password to the blog, as an added precaution.

Natasha said...

natasha here

diogene 505

Bob also says to "dollar cost average on weakness" In addition to "Not saying how to divide up your money, over how many months" he doesn't say what a "weakness" is and if you should put a certain amount more of money in during whatever this supposed "weakness" is. Then what would you do, skip the next few months?

Don't feel bad - I can't make sense out of these directions, either.


Jerrod Clarkson said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Daddy Paul said...

I had no problem finding this blog. Bob brinker honey. Love the blog,

Honeybee said...

.
Thanks to dRahme for sending the Moneytalk clips from Sunday's broadcast:

1. Brinker hammering Medicare and Social Security.

Honey sez: Brinker has NEVER once mentioned Medical, welfare, section 8, food stamps, etc. - actual handouts that often goes to illegal aliens in this country.

His utter ignorance about both Medicare and Social Security is appalling. Clearly he has no idea how much WORKERS pay in to both all during their working years....

Then when Social Security "benefits" are collected, they are taxed (up to 85%).

And Medicare continues to COST "beneficiaries" a large payment each month upon enrollment (that's in addition to paying in throughout the working years).

Multi-millionaires like Brinker have got a lot of chutzpah to call those government-forced programs "entitlements."

dRahme Audio Clip

Honeybee said...

.
dRahme AUDIO CLIP......The week ahead

Honeybee said...

.
HOUR ONE:

dRahme AUDIO CLIP.... FED winding, unwinding, CPI, Tariffs, Interest Rates

Anonymous said...

Nine years late to the bull market.
1.5 years late to the Trump rally.
Welcome to the party investment geniuses.

Ben Gibson

frankj said...

AT&T and Time/Warner merger OK'd. AT&T down about 1.9% TW up about 3.9%. Appeal unlikely.

Jerrod Clarkson said...

Honeybee,

Sorry to bother you with this, but this SFB A-HOLE is intruding again. Could you please cleanse the board? Thank you!

----------------------------------------------------
Anonymous Jerrod Clarkson said...
Honeybee,
I think the Rocket Man's haircut is adorable!
JC
June 11, 2018 at 9:09 PM
----------------------------------------------------

Honeybee said...

.
Jerrod...Disinfectant applied....

Honeybee said...

.
Daddy Paul....Glad to hear no problems - and thanks for nice words. :)

J Wales said...

Anyone ever listen to David Stockman in an interview. He really does a great job making a bearish case for stocks. He has been making his case for at least 10 years. He has what seem to be rational reasons for a stock market melt down but he is the peoverbial stopped clock. He is going to be right someday. It goes to show you even people highly educated in economics don't seem to grasp the markets & how they work. He really does a good job explaining why what is happening shouldn't be happening. Like I suppose he might think he knows what is happening but knowing & thinking you know are very different.

MK said...

I follow Bogle's philosophy: Dollar cost average in any type of market. And do it according to the risk you have decided to take on. Rebalance as needed to maintain your determined risk.

MK said...

Consider using a VPN connection if you aren't already.

Unknown said...

Honey, will the fact US tax revenue continues to set records, following the tax cuts, cause Bob to readdress the dire warnings being pushed last year? https://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/terence-p-jeffrey/feds-collect-record-individual-income-taxes-through-may-still-run

MK said...

With a 20 year investment time horizon I would likely dump it in all at once unless I had a strong suspicion the market might tank soon, say in an environment with an inverted yield curve. But even if the market were to tank after you put 100k into it, with a 20 year investment horizon you would likely grow it.

With a short investment horizon I think I would go bonds or CDs. I might even buy rental property with the 100k.

Honeybee said...

.
Team Recon....I can give you my best guess and opinion based on years of listening carefully to Bob Brinker's Moneytalk. :)

Nope, he won't. Even when he is forced to give good news, he presents it as bad news - OR presents it as just an ongoing scenario over many years.

I have never heard him give President Trump credit for ANYTHING.

Honeybee said...

.
Right on cue, the FOMC raised interest rates and quarter of a percent and the market dropped.

The Fed lowered interest rates down to zero during the two Obama terms, and managed to keep the economy barely alive. It also set the stock market on an upward trajectory. Now things are different. As reported by Fox Business:


The Federal Reserve on Wednesday raised short-term interest rates for the second time this year and signaled a faster pace of rate hikes through the end of the year.

As expected, policymakers at the central bank said they voted to hike the benchmark federal funds rate by a quarter percentage point, setting a range of 1.75% to 2%. The Fed expects to raise rates twice more in 2018, bringing the yearly total to four and confirming investor speculation that rate hikes would accelerate. Officials previously indicated that three rate hikes would come this year.

Economists and Wall Street strategists are closely following the Fed’s policy moves. The Fed has signaled that it will continue to gradually increase rates in response to higher inflation and strength in the U.S. labor market. Officials have also set in motion a plan to reduce the Fed’s bond holdings, as the central bank moves away from accommodative policies employed during and after the 2008 financial crisis.

Higher rates also impact consumers by increasing borrowing costs. Auto loan rates are at nine-year highs, while 30-year fixed mortgage rates recently climbed to their highest level in seven years.


Video of Chair Powell's Speech

Unknown said...

Flattening of the yield curve.

Short-term interest rates rise with the biggest change in the 2 year T note.

Chris Gail, LLC said...

Yup, the Fed intends to invert that yield curve and induce a recession before the next presidential election.

Cuz those esteemed mahogany chairs are populated by academia and swamp dwellers. "It's about the economy, dummy." Pure irony that it's James Carville's most famous quote and he's from Louisiana, a swampy geography but in a good way.

So what's wrong with a little inflation?

Gosh, 3% can't be that bad. Might even give the millennials a reason to shut off the laptop and take a shower. In fact, which is worse, 1% or 3% inflation "going forward"? The economists I know are scared witless of the 1% boogie man.

The Fed has historically over-projected economic growth as predictably as a Chicago Cubs iffy season, no disrespect to the Cubs.

Just sayin', if this economy rolls over at about mid-year 2020 you will know why.

Honeybee said...

.
Chris Gail LLC.....I see it the way you do.

The Fed kept cutting and claiming that deflation is worse than moderate inflation.

But if we look back to when they began the steady rate increases, it's almost all during the Trump Presidency.

However, it's far more important what the FED is doing to the markets through Quantitative Tightening in order to unwind all that Quantitative Easing they did during Obama's years in order to prop up the economy and stock market.

THAT IS HUGE and never reported, except by Bob Brinker.

Unknown said...

Honey, unwinding QE is a far more important step in regaining fiscal health in the long run than the rate hikes. On a positive, the expanding US economy is going to build through all of this. Billions in repatriated cash, and far more people being productive in our workforce will assure this.

gabe said...

The ECB is holding sway on interest rates! while The Fed is raising rates with possibly 2 more by the end of the year. So...what does that mean, if anything.

Gabe

Honeybee said...

.
Team Recon...I certainly believe every word you said is correct.

Natasha said...

Natasha here
A fixed income person til me that when the fed actually increases interest rates it takes about two more weeks ( end of June this time) for their cd offerings to go up. I am testing this.a few days prior to June 13 vanguard’ 6 month new issue cd was 2.10 percent. It still is today. I

Irwin in Skokie said...

THE GREAT DEFORMATION by David Stockman published in 2013 is 743 pages..very negative, revisionist, doomsday predictions....little or none has happened....sour past and present for a once hopefull econ educator

J Wales said...

Tim would you go so far as to say stocks will look cheap today five year from now?

Bluce said...

Natasha: I bought a bunch of different-length CDs in early May via Schwab. He lists dozens and dozens that are available, from every bank you can imagine. The 6-month I bought then yields 1.95%. Today the top-yielding from Schwab is at 2.111%.

I noticed yesterday (or the day before) the highest one-year at Schwab was at 2.55; today it is down a bit at 2.50%, so they don't move in precise lockstep with whatever the Fed is doing.

Anonymous said...

Next recession (overdue) will see the SP500
below 2,000. A mere 30% drop.
A 60% drop will see SP500 back to 1,000.
Cash is where it’s at kiddies.

Ben Gibson

J Wales said...

Will BB get out before the drop or will the faithful ride out another gut wrenching bear? I'm too old to take another ride to the bottom.

Honeybee said...

.
J. Wales....I would not count on Bob Brinker getting out before the next "gut wrenching bear" drop.

He simply never raises cash, unless you go back to year 2000 - the last time. And even then, he only raised 65% cash.

And then he called for a "counter-trend rally" and had followers put 30-to-50% of that cash into QQQ, where it lost over 70% of value.

He covered all of that up, and basically started over in March 2003.

My opinion is that he will never do that again. Largely because he has been successful in selling newsletters with sizzle rather than steak. IOW: He looks for "buying opportunities" for "new money,"

J Wales said...

Yeah my facination with timming the stock market has run its course. Some wellesley or something similar is about it for me. Let the the river boat gamblers roll the dice.

Unknown said...

SS and Medicare concerns: We read of the dire predicament of these two gov't benefits that we have paid for. Yes, that is right we have paid for these benefits managed and operated by federal government. We had mandatory withdrawals per our income records to fully finance these benefits. So, what's the problem? Answer, popularity politics and government ineptitude. Meaning we should never allow government the power to control our critical needs. Period. They can't be trusted. They are lying to you. How do you know? When their lips are moving.

The swamp has already fixed medicare and SS. How? By doing nothing. Yes, that is right. The solution is to let benefits cave. Sure, they may do some political sensitivity votes (Oprah feel good stuff), but the best solution to the Boomer bubble is to let this generation take it on the chin. Problem solved. This generation has a history of picking up the tab.

J Wales said...

I can't believe its Butter Parkay:) i read the diability side of SS is doing great. So I guess file for disability. That boat might fill up fast though. Anyone under 50 will probably get their benefit chopped in half by da dems congress during Trumps second term.

J Wales said...

Let me guess the dems will blame the Donalds tax cuts for forcing draconian cuts on us cotton tops.

Mad as HELL ! said...

"Cotton Tops"

That is funny. I have never heard that before!

I wish I had a cotton top, but being bald does have some advantages.

Anonymous said...

LOL. A guy on an investment forum bashing the “Dems.”
You might wanna back check performance charts. Probably be tough to swallow here but the market has significantly done better under the “Dems”
Since WW2 the “Dems” averaged around +11% per year vs Republicans with +9% average annual gains.

So I’m curious why an investment blog is so anti “Dems”.
Performance is what we like, right?

Ben Gibson

Jerrod Clarkson said...

Movin' on up:

My Fidelity MMF: 7-Day Yield % = 1.88%

I think we might just crack 2% in the near future.

JC

Ruyfa said...

The left wasnt always so left or center. Jfk was a real tax cutter Dem that enjoyed nice growth in both equities and the gdp.

gabe said...

JC: Vanguard pays 1.96%.

Gabe

J Wales said...

Its really a game of determining who pays. Of course its always easiest to shaft the group who has no represention at the table which in this case is future generations. Hence the $22 trillion & counting debt. Will we grow out of it? Depends on who you ask

J Wales said...

The ultra short bond fund at Vanguard pays nearly 2.5% & its positive for the year. Unless the credit markets freeze up again its pretty safe I would think.

MK said...

If my only or chief concern in life was getting a 2% better average annual gain from my investments I too might be curious as to why the bias of this blog is so anti "Dems".

Bluce said...

Creeping leftism . . . Hubert Humphrey was a Democrat from a couple of generations ago. You will not find anybody in the Democrat Party today who thinks like this, and barely a handful in the GOP who would support this statement today:

"Certainly one of the chief guarantees of freedom under any government, no matter how popular and respected, is the right of citizens to keep and bear arms. This is not to say that firearms should not be very carefully used and that definite safety rules of precaution should not be taught and enforced. But the right of citizens to bear arms is just one more guarantee against arbitrary government, one more safeguard against a tyranny which now appears remote in America, but which historically has proved to be always possible." -- Hubert Humphrey, Feb. 1960.

Bluce said...

FWIW: I have a good portion of my fixed in SPDR Short Term Corporate, which has a 30-day yield of 3.05% and a duration of 1.9 years.

The yield is as good as many intermediate bond funds.

Chris Gail, LLC said...

Good point, Honey, nobody in the media is reporting the Fed's QT program except for Brinker. As a bond guy, he's all over it.

Of course, he has a vested interest in laying out the naked facts because it sells newsletters and model portfolios. But to his credit, he's a loner upon the media landscape.

Yes, QT is huge and will affect us "whether we like it or not", quote unattributed.

So let's gird for better money market returns and worse stock market valuations.

Ain't that a kick in the head?

Trees said...

I don't understand the 2% short term and MM concern? Given inflation is as high or higher and the economy has much going for it. Is it the high cost of stocks or the long bull market? The historical stuff that I read and articles on market timing is convincing. The cost of being out of market for more than 6 months is almost always a loser. The history of yield curve is a mixed one for predictions. When one fully appreciates why stocks increases in value over time and the history of stocks return as compared to bonds it becomes apparent. Only if a country is fundamentally changing it's economy such as Venezuela would investing be a poor choice. If you believe the U.S. is where it's at with technology, innovation, private enterprise, all within a more reliable and stable operation, then the future will be brighter and so will be your investments. The U.S. is top tier on this regard as compared to the competition. IMHO, if you want less risk in your investments first invest domestically. If you think were headed to brighter future invest. If you want good returns or top shelf the stock market index such as VTI is the place. Bob Brinker knows all of this and the reason he doesn't time the market any more. Basically, you have to endure the volatility of stock and maintain. Very few times in history where bonds beat stocks and when they do it is usually marginal. Stocks beat bonds 3:1 and by bigger margins.

So, my 2 cents is the accumulation phase one should be in VTI. Same, for long term retiree investments except this group needs 5 years of "safe" money. This could be MM, CDs, or short term bond fund, but a Wellesley account probably will preform better with a little more volatility. I've settled for this and Wellington, but half will sit in VTI. I guess if we need money we have to be able to risk losing some to make a decent return. There is no free lunch other than diversification in which VTI has you covered. Given that, the fund will drop and increase about the same as general market place.

By the way the one thing that most advisor's never mention that is of paramount importance is the spending flexibility. Accumulators need flex savings into investments 2x within large stock pull backs. Retirees, need to flex decrease spending 2x during same period. If you have no wiggle room in the budget, fix that first.

J Wales said...

I don't market timming will work based largely on history & what ever else BB uses. The Fed with QE & now QT have made this a unique time in history for the finacial system as we've come to know it. BB is no spring chicken. Im not either but there's just too many firsts going on. Federal debt is mushrooming to epic levels. I know there's money being thrown around like confetti on different federal projects. Craft people making $100k+. House prices are getting too high in my opinion. Someone shoot holes in my brash statements. I need some counter balance to keep me in line.

natasha said...

natasha here
Hi J. Wales,
I have no counter to your arguments. I am risk averse so I am always always concerned. I have little in the way of monthly income from ss and retirement benefits, so I don's have much of a room to be taking risk with my savings.

That said, may I suggest you repost your comment of June 17 on the actual June 17 broadcast comments after Honeybee kindly posts the bob brinker summary. I am interested in what responses you might get, and doubt that many people will be reading more on this comment suggestion.

Best to you,
Natasha

J Wales said...

Can the blog host repost my post? I have limited reposting skills. Help please

Honeybee said...

.
J.Wales...I reposted your comments on the new thread.

Natasha...I copied your answer there too.