Wednesday, May 30, 2012

May 30, 2012 Bob Brinker's Stock Hedge Against Rising Oil Prices

May 30, 2012....Suncor, Bob Brinker's oil stock pick: OUCH!

Three years ago, Bob Brinker added Suncor (SU) to his list of recommended individual issues. May 1, 2009 Marketimer, Bob Brinker wrote: "We rate Suncor attractive for purchase in the mid-$20s price range. We view Suncor as an excellent way to protect portfolios against rising oil prices in the future."   SU opened that day at $26 and closed at $27.30.

Over the past three years, Brinker has repeated said the stock is "attractive for purchase" below $33.00. Suncor did well in 2011. It rose into the $40 range and topped on April 8, 2011 at $46.65. At no time did Brinker issue any kind of "take profits" signal. In the most recent issue of Marketimer, Brinker is still rating it a buy "under $33.00.

Obviously, this stock is not off-setting the enormous rises in the price of gasoline over the past few months. I paid well over $4.00 a gallon in San Jose last week.

But how has it done compared to the energy exchanged-traded-fund, XLE?



Like all of  Brinker's "picks" (stocks and ETFs) they are never tracked or rated for performance. Occasionally, Brinker will mention something he recommended if it is doing well, but never the ones that don't. One of his worst picks ever was DVY. It got crushed in the 2008-2009 bear market. When it was doing well, he recommended it to callers, but has not mentioned it for over four years now.

Sunday, May 27, 2012

May 27, 2012...Bob Brinker's Moneytalk: Summary, Excerpts and Commentary

May 27, 2012....Bob Brinker's fill-in host was on today -- Lynn Jimenez, who is business reporter for KGO810 radio. She authored a Spanish/English book geared for beginners  (I  posted quotes from her book below.)

STOCK MARKET..... Lynn said:  "We continue to get evidence the economy and the market are not one and the same....While the economy has been showing some signs of strength, the market has been retreating. Until this week, the Dow which did fall Friday, snapped its three week losing streak. It rose 85 points for the week to 12,454. Year-to-date, it's up 1.94%, not a lot. The S&P 500 lost a few points on Friday, but it too is up for the week to 1332. For the year, it's ahead 4.79%......The S&P 500's  price to earning ratio fell to 13.1 on May 18th."

Honey EC: Bob Brinker views the current stock market "consolidation" as "health-restoring," and expects it  to be "contained within the single-digit percentage range as measured from the April 2, 2012 S&P 500 closing high of 1419." His  S&P 500 Index target range is "upper-1400's to lower-1500s within the next twelve months."

Lynn said: "Trading volume is low. Those who are trading are more sensitive to Europe's debt crisis. They fear that  bank defaults there will once again freeze credit globally. And there are some signs that China's economy is slowing."

Honey EC: Bob Brinker certainly does not agree with Lynn about Europe's problems affecting the stock market: 

Brinker said this on Moneytalk last week: “Greece represents 2% of the Gross Domestic Product of the Eurozone (worldwide it’s much less)….Now there are a lot of Greek sovereign bonds held by institutions….These are already substantially marked down as a result of the terms of the second annual bailout. And frankly by now, investors have already had a lot of time to adjust their portfolios to a reasonable level of risk to such a super junk bond represented by Greece…..The Greek situation has been going on for two years…..Is this going to be something that brings down the global economy….I don’t think it is.” 

Brinker said this on May 6th: "The US market is a function of  the corporate earning power of the companies that are primarily based in the United States....The present value of today's common stocks in the United States are dependent on the future estimates of their earnings and their dividends. They are not based on who the president of France is, Stan. That would be an absurd notion to say. What you are suggesting is that the US stock market depended on who's in the president's office in France. That's ridiculous....The stability of Europe is already in doubt. This is nothing new here....Believe me, the notion that the United States stock market is going to rise or fall depending on who the president of France is -- that is not what powers the US stock market."  

Lynn said: "What's more, this week the Congressional Budget Office put numbers to what could happen if congress remains gridlocked for the rest of the year.  A nasty January surprise, a recession as the economy contracts. Why? We are going to see those mandated spending cuts that resulted from  last summer's battle over whether to honor bills racked up by the congress earlier. We are going to see  the expiration  of a number of tax cuts, including the adjustment for the Alternative Minimum Tax.....So even if the spending cuts that are planned are changed, there is one proposal to counter them and that would  decimate all non-defense spending to increase the military budget....."

Honey EC: Brinker calls this January tax hike a "Fiscal Cliff." He said this on April 29th:  "We've talked on the program about the importance of getting fiscal matters together in the USA, and it's going to be a challenge because of what is now commonly being referred to in the financial media as the "fiscal cliff....It comes to fruition when the ball comes down on New Years Eve in Time Square at the end of 2012. Because a lot taxes go up, a lot of tax breaks come to an end and a lot of spending reductions go into effect. Remember the failure of the super committee earlier this year to agree upon a new budget plan and the automatic triggers that came into play?  Those will be triggered at the beginning of next year.....Probably it will be dealt with in a lame duck manner at the end of the year."

Lynn said: "Now if things are so grim, why are stocks holding up at this level? Because the US economy is the bright spot in the global economy. We're growing, slowly, but we're growing. That's the same reason why crude oil, which  plunged below $90 a barrel for the first time in seven months this week, rose slightly on Friday."

CONSUMER SENTIMENT....Lynn said: "Consumer sentiment, as measure by the University of Michigan, is at it's highest level since October of 2007. The consumer index jumped nearly three points from April, more than expected."

JOBS....Lynn said: "Two thousand fewer Americans filed for jobless benefits last week. That's hardly a blip.  But total claims are holding at 370,000, and that's a level where hiring happens enough to bring the jobless rate lower. Employers have added one million jobs in the past five months."

Honey EC: I only listened to the first hour of the program, but Jeffchristie listened to all of it. He reports that there was nothing worth my time to report or your time to read. But if you want to hear the program, it is now available free at KSFO 560 radio. 

On a different topic, I want to report that I have purchased a used copy of Lynn Jimenez' book for about $3.50 at Amazon: ¿Se Habla Dinero? The Everyday Guide to Financial Success (English and Spanish Edition)

The entire book is written so that when you open any page, the left side is in Spanish and the right side is in English.   Each time Lynn fills in for Brinker, I will do a little book report on some of the subjects in it.  This chapter piqued my interest, it may yours too. Emphasis is mine:

Se Habla Dinero, Page 279, Chapter 22, Lynn Jimenez wrote: ".........By 2010, Hispanics working outside their countries of birth are expected to send home more than $100 billion in amounts averaging $200 to $400 a month.


Those of you sending money may not be rich, but you are dedicated to sending what you can. That's why it's important to be aware of  the total cost, security, reliability and availability of what you send. Sending money home now is a lot different than when Mrs. Vega first arrived in the United States....."

The rest of this chapter has sections titled: Cash Transfers; Money Orders: Banking or Wire Transfers; Money Transfers via Plastic.
On a lighter note,  Jeffchristie wrote:
Lynn Jimenez was the replacement host for Bob Brinker on Moneytalk today.  She also is:

A)  President of the San Francisco chapter of La Raza.

B)  Chairman of the California Democratic party.

C)  Speech writer for Debbie Wassermann Schultz.

D)  She gives speeches to people telling them how to hide assets so they can apply for student aid that they wouldn't be eligible for because of their net worth.

ANSWER: Investing in the Future: Money & School with Lynn Jimenez
In Edit: There has been some disagreement about what Lynn recommended on this video -- and what she was talking about, so I have transcribed the first few minutes of the video. 

Each can draw their own conclusions. I don't hear anything that tells me she had any moral compunction about "hiding assets."  She makes a passing reference to "fraud," but is more concerned with the reward not being worth the risk.

Near the beginning of the video, Lynn Jimenez said: "A short version of how you set up a long-term blueprint to prepare to pay for your child's education.  You may have heard that savings can hurt your chances of financial aid. That's only a little bit true these days because things have changed. On average, when you apply for financial aid, you are asked to pay based on income and assets. Savings are assets, right? But current formulas tax only about 5% of assets a year. That is, the formula assumes that  5% of your family savings are available to help out with tuition and fees every year. And that's not too bad.The size of your family matters and whether you have more than one child in college at a time matters. So all of that factors into your favor.

If you don't want savings in the family name to be considered when you apply for financial aid, you could put it into someone else's name. Someone you really trust, who's willing to pay tax on the interest as needed, who could the hold assets for your child for years. Don't do it, you know,  if you only have two years, that's fraud, but it's also a lot of work. And then someone who will give it back when it's needed for school, so you'd need a written contract. I think it's a lot of work and risk for a little benefit.  But you know, if you have a lot of savings or you want to make that a fund the whole family contributes to and then releases when it's needed, it could work. Just don't build a large account, as I said, only to transfer at the last minute. I mean, the financial records show what you've done. You know... "


Moneytalk is free on Demand and downloadable at:  KSFO 560: 1-4pm    for seven days after broadcast.

Saturday, May 26, 2012

May 26, 2012, Bob Brinker's International Mutual Funds


May 26, 2012....Bob Brinker recommends investing a portion of equity holdings in international mutual funds. Each of his Marketimer model portfolios have weightings of Vanguard International (VWIGX) and Vanguard  All-World Funds (VFWIX).  

In January 2012, Brinker raised the weighting on  the Vanguard International Growth Fund by 5%. He sold all holdings (5%) in the Dodge and Cox International Fund. Since then, Vanguard's International Funds have  done better than Dodge and Cox, but much worse than the total stock market fund.


Vanguard High Yield Bond Fund  CLOSING TO MOST NEW INVESTORS:
 Due to a sharp increase in cash flow into Vanguard High-Yield Corporate Fund—more than $2 billion in the last six months alone—we've closed the fund to most new investors.
 While issuance of high-yield securities remains strong (the first quarter of 2012 saw the highest amount on record), we remain sensitive to the potential liquidity challenges that can arise in the market. Because of this potential, we've determined that limiting cash flow into the fund is in the best interest of its existing investors. This move will help the fund's advisor, Wellington Management Company, continue to execute its high-quality approach to high-yield investing.
           (SNIP)

This isn't the first time Vanguard High-Yield Corporate Fund has closed because of high demand. In June 2003, the fund closed after it had a cash inflow of $1.4 billion during the first five months of the year. The fund reopened about six months later after cash flow slowed to a more manageable level.
Was it coincidence that Bob Brinker first added Vanguard High-Yield Fund to Marketimer fixed income  portfolio on April 11, 2003 and $1.4 billion flooded into the fund in June 2003?

I don't know for sure how Brinker handles a fund that he recommends when it is closed. As I recall, in the past, he has made a switch into a different but comparable fund. However, Brinker thinks that Vanguard High-Yield Fund is in a class by itself.

Sunday, May 20, 2012

May 20, 2012, Bob Brinker's Moneytalk: Summary, Excerpts and Commentary

May 20, 2012....Bob Brinker hosted Moneytalk today........(comments welcome)

STOCK MARKET...Bob Brinker did not mention the stock market today in spite of these facts:  The S&P  500 Index posted its sixth consecutive decline, closing below 1300 -- a loss of 4.30% for the week.  This makes a total of three weekly declines and it's very close to the official benchmark 10% correction (around 1277), just under the 200-day moving average. 

Honey EC: In the May 2012 issue of Marketimer,  Brinker  continues to recommend dollar-cost-averaging new money into the market and considers "short-term corrections.....as a health-restoring development." All of his model portfolios remain fully invested.

GREECE AND THE EQUITY MARKETS:  The first caller asked if Greece would affect "the equity markets."  Brinker danced a fine jitterbug and didn't answer the question. Instead he said  that "it depends on what equity markets you are talking about," then launched into how Greece is bankrupt, and may soon be out of the Euro and have to print their own currency. 

Brinker said: “Greece represents 2% of the Gross Domestic Product of the Eurozone (worldwide it’s much less)….Now there are a lot of Greek sovereign bonds held by institutions….These are already substantially marked down as a result of the terms of the second annual bailout. And frankly by now, investors have already had a lot of time to adjust their portfolios to a reasonable level of risk to such a super junk bond represented by Greece…..The Greek situation has been going on for two years…..Is this going to be something that brings down the global economy….I don’t think it is.” 

FACEBOOK IPO AND BRINKER'S 15 YEAR-OLD CAR....Brinker listed some of the new Facebook billionaires:  Zuckerberg, $19 billion; James Breyer, who put in $14 million seven years ago that's now worth $5.8 billion -- and several others. He speculated that maybe these newly-rich will go out and buy  some $1200 jeans or $20,000 bicycles. Brinker said: "I certainly never will. I am proudly driving a 15 year old car, because I like it. I keep it in good shape and I like it." 

Honey EC: Brinker and I have something in common. I too, drive a 15-year old car (mostly) because I like it.  I compared it to new cars and decided I'd rather do the  needed work to keep it in  "good shape" and drive it at least another couple of years.  My decision was partly based on the horrific state sales tax in California. 

FACEBOOK IPO MANIPULATION? Brinker said: "Let's get it straight. Facebook is the single most over-hyped IPO of all time. Nothing even comes close....It went public at $38 and closed at $38.23. Come on, that's less than one percent.....Why didn't it go below $38 on the first day?  That's where the underwriter and stabilization agent comes in....In this case, Morgan Stanley is responsible for supporting the stock price  in the initial trades, certainly on the first day. The number one goal is to keep the price at $38 or better for psychological reasons....If it had gone below $38, then anybody that bought the stock on the IPO would be losing money. They might even ......decide to bail. The worst thing is when the stock goes below the offering price on the first day it is called a busted IPO.....It didn't happen because Morgan Stanley, no doubt, was in there buying stock at $38 a share, holding the line on the offering price." 

WHO IS TAKING FACEBOOK RISK? Brinker made the point that those who are buying the IPO are taking the risk, not those who have taken exponentially more money than they put in for the start-up. "They don't make the money until they sell the stock. And you'll notice that some of the early investors were not bashful about bailing out. I mentioned Peter Feel, he sold 1/3 of his holdings that only cost him $167,000 and he got $640 million.... that basically fell out of the sky. The same thing for the CEO at Zinga, he puts in $40,000 check and takes out $38 million dollars. You haven't made any money at all until you sell the stock. That's the only way that you make the money..... Will Facebook be able to monetize their social networking product that it will justify the share price?"    

GENERAL MOTORS DISAPPOINTED WITH FACEBOOK ADS....Brinker announced that just this week, GM took a $10 million ad budget away from Facebook because they didn't like the results they were getting.  "The ad revenue for the first quarter declined from $943 million down to $872 million." 

CALIFORNIA TAX-FREE MUNIS….Caller Dick from Foster City asked about the safety of "highly-rated California tax-free municipal bond funds issued by high-income school districts."  Brinker said: “You have to be careful. I would certainly go with Moody and S&P ratings on such school districts......And I would not make any large investments in any one small area." 

ZERO COUPONS....Caller Ron from Punta Gorda praised Brinker for getting him into zero coupon bonds 22 years ago and turning $74,000 into $700,000 -- tax-deferred. He asked if he should sell them. Brinker replied: "All you have to decide  is what you are going to do in terms of re-investing your money....If you do decide to take these enormous profits, it's important to remind yourself....Okay, you just sold a Zero Treasury at essentially the highest rate it will ever be.  Rates are so far down now, there's not that much left to go to zero." 

VANGUARD GINNIE MAE FUND (VFIIX)  Brinker said: "Yes, it's true that the Ginnie Mae has been a great investment. I'm eternally grateful that we've been recommending Ginnie Maes for so many years...even during many years when a lot of people out there were naysayers.....they were all wrong.  But you need remember, in the event down the road that we see a normalization of interest rates..... Then that is going to be reflected in the net asset value of all bond funds." 

ECONOMY, INTEREST RATES AND MANAGING RISK....Brinker said: "They are going to stay down if we stay on the slow growth track we are on because there is nothing to push them up. The Federal Reserve is trying to stimulate the economy.....That's what holds mortgage rates down. That's what helps the housing market to do a turnaround -- even though we are in the very early stages.....Normalization of interest rates is inevitable and US taxpayers are going to be horrified when that day comes . When they see how much more they have to pay interest on federal debt -- you don't even want to go there.....If you going to be in a bond fund, you develop a mental stop loss....These Federal Reserve statements are only good as long as the economy is growing slowly. If the economy should grow rapidly, they would throw that policy under the bus. I see a slow growing economy. At best, slow to moderate." 

REPORTING DIVIDENDS ON VODAFONE -- WILL BE ON MONEYTALK FINAL EXAM:  Larry from Springfield said he had emailed  Brinker about the yield on Vodafone. He said his local paper had it at 7 1/2 and Brinker's Marketimer has it at 5 1/2. "You told me in your email that you do not count the special dividend distributions. Would you explain that to me."  

Brinker replied: "When we quote a yield in the Marketimer investment letter, on a stock, we want subscribers to expect that based on the current dividend pay-out rate.....What you're talking about is, Vodafone received a special dividend from it's 45% ownership from Verizon....Vodafone passed most of that $40 million along to shareholders....but you can't be certain that will happen every year.....If you see this on the Moneytalk Final Exam, I'd hate to see you get it wrong......What is the annual indicated dividend payout rate on Vodafone common. The answer is a little over 5%.....Larry, if you get this wrong on the Moneytalk Final, I'm going to cry."

Honey EC: Vodafone is one of three stocks that Brinker has on  list of  recommended individual issues. The other two single stocks on the list are Microsoft and Suncor. The others are ETFs, including GLD and DVY.  Brinker first recommended Suncor (SU) May 2009, in the "mid-20's." It's still listed as a "buy" below $33 -- which means it's a roaring-buy right now at $26.86. It's done several round trips into the mid-$40s, but like Brinker usually does, especially with off-the-books recommendations, he never gives "time to take profit" signals.  

REAL ESTATE....Brinker said: "The things that are going on in real estate are just amazing. Now in general, we are in the early stages of stability and improvement in the real estate market.....Properties in Southern California, in some neighborhoods, are going on the market....are selling right away, getting multiple offers and selling above the offering price.....There are also  signs of increasing demand in other areas of the country in high-end properties, places like New York, places like Boston, and certainly along the coast of California. So it's not just the greater L.A. area.....I think it is stunning to see bidding wars breaking out in some areas....This would have been unheard of even a year ago."

Honey EC: In neighborhoods near me, homes are selling almost instantly, sometimes without even going on the market for desirable view-properties.  And inventories are dropping rapidly.

WHICH IS BETTER: THIRTY YEARS IN STOCK MARKET OR A 30-YEAR LOAN? John from New Jersey wanted to know which is a better choice for cash, taking out a 30-year loan and putting money into the S&P 500 for 30 years or paying off the house. He said a  friend had recommended the stock market route, claiming that over 30 years, nobody beats the stock market. 

Brinker replied: "If you have the money sitting in a money market fund getting next to nothing, you're better off paying for cash.....No person can speak for your tolerance for risk. I wonder how he would have felt if he had done that January of 2000, when the S&P 500 was trading in the 1400s, then a couple of years later, if he had looked at the account and seen it was down 50% at the bottom in October 2002. These people can be very cavalier with this sort of thing, but if you have it invested in a positive way, then obviously, you want to keep it invested.....The S&P 500 has a yield of close to 2%....And you get a write-off on your tax return....Let's not forget that we have no idea what the tax code will be in 2013."

Honey EC: Brinker regularly hearkens back twelve years to the 2000-2002 bear market because he was partially in cash for that one.  But he ignores the big pink pig in the room which is the megabear market that happened just four years ago. The 2007-2009 bear market was deeper than the 2000 -2002 bear. It was down 57% at the bottom, and he was fully invested the whole time. Both of his equity model portfolios lost over 50% from the top to bottom.  So if you did as Brinker pointed out and bought at the January 2000 top, you would now have ridden out TWO 50% bear markets. 

STOCK STEALTH GAMBLER AND DIVERSIFICATION.... Brinker explained that a stealth gambler is not a person who goes to the race track, or someone that hangs out in the sports books in Vegas or Reno, because that is very transparent gambling. Nope, it's someone who has most all of their money in one stock.  To those people, he recommends diversification. 

POLITICS.... Brinker repeated what he has said before about how no one in Washington will do anything about the tax deadlines that are looming at the end of this year. He says the US has the best government money can buy and that it is "dysfunctional." 

WHAT ARE OIL SPECULATORS?  Brinker said: "They are straw-men who are built by politicians in order to make populist points on the campaign trail....Speculators are straw-men manufactured by politicians to gain votes from voters  that don't know what day of the week it is......Oil speculators might be an oil company that is hedging its position in the futures market. What's wrong with that? They should do that. Their shareholders expect them to do that. This whole business of blaming oil prices on speculators is nothing but politics."  

COMEDY SKIT OF THE DAY; IT'S THE END OF THE WORLD, WATCH THE MOOSE:  AC in Oregon said: "There will be some major Earth changes. Within the next ten years, half the life on the planet will be deceased. I was wondering what kind of investments, maybe gold and silver rather than any form of stocks and the website is..........(Brinker bleeped that out)....There's going to be major earthquakes.... and Yellowstone will erupt. We've got moose moved down into eastern Oregon, western Washington." 

Brinker replied: "Well AC, I'm glad you had a chance to speak your mind. Let me just say this about that: I hope you're wrong. And that is not an investment question."  To next caller, Brinker said: "I saw the moose, I didn't get too close because I was warned, but I saw the moose on a trip to Yellowstone and Jackson Hole and that area. I was very impressed, but you don't want to get carried away with the moose."

Brinker's guest speaker was Daniel Borenstein, editor for the Conta Costa Times. He addressed the topic of outrageous public employee debt which right now is over $30,000 per household in the State of California. If you live in California or just don't want to pay to bail us out, I highly recommend that you carefully read this column:  Borenstein: California households owe an average $30,500 for public employee pension debt

On a lighter note, Jeffchristie wrote:

Today Bob talked about the Moneytalk final exam.  Here is this week's question.  Bob Brinker is a member of:
A) The Augusta National Golf club.

B) The Democratic party.

C) The New York Society of Security Analysts
D) Occupy Wall Street.
Moneytalk on Demand and To Go are FREE at KSFO 560 for seven days after broadcast. Download Sunday, hours 1-4pm.

Wednesday, May 16, 2012

May 16, 2012, Could Bob Brinker Miss Another Bear Market?

May 16, 2012....What are the chances that Bob Brinker (who claims to be able to sidestep bear markets) would entirely miss the next bear market?

In Bob Brinker's opinion, 10% corrections are to be expected at any time and should be yawned at. He has told Moneytalk callers if they are bothered by that kind of "noise" in the market, they shouldn't be invested in it.  Brinker views 10 to 20%  as intermediate-term corrections,  and drops over 20% are considered a bear market.

So how many 20% bear markets has Bob Brinker missed since his Marketimer model portfolios went  fully invested in March 2003?  Surprisingly, he has missed TWO Bear markets in that nine years. And he took subscribers and listeners on a roller-coaster ride of their lives in the megabear of 2008-2009!
#1: October 2007 all-time-high = 1576; March 2009 bottom = 667. 
       Total percentage drop = 58%
#2  Last year in 2011: High = 1371; Low 1077
       Total percentage drop = 22% (intraday)
 As of today, the S&P 500 Index has declined  ten out of the last 13 trading days -- very slowly but inexorably downward the past four days in a row.  It is 6.64% off its year-to-date closing high of April 2nd, but still up 5.34% YTD.

Brinker hasn't talked about stock market or even given the closing numbers (like he often does when it's rising), since the decline started.  Perhaps he is patiently waiting for it to turn up again (let's hope it does).

In the May 2012 issue of Marketimer,  Brinker  continues to recommend dollar-cost-averaging new money into the market and considers "short-term corrections.....as a health-restoring development." All of his model portfolios remain fully invested.

Monday, May 14, 2012

May 14, 2012, What Bob Brinker's Saying About the Stock Market

May 14, 2012....Bob Brinker did not comment on the latest stock market declines on Moneytalk yesterday. Bob Brinker typically becomes an ostrich whenever the stock market declines for more than a few days or has a correction.  Usually, he will only talk about bears and dips in the rearview mirror.  So let's review his most current outlook and predictions for the stock market.
 
* Brinker remains bullish and fully invested.  He expects great things going forward and  has raised his  S&P 500 target range twice this year.  

 * In the January Marketimer, Brinker wrote:  "We  remain positive on the stock market outlook as we expect the S&P 500 Index to rally into the low-to-mid 1400s range this year."

* In the March Marketimer, Brinker raised that level to "mid-to-upper 1400s" and he extended the time frame out to one year -- which would take it into March 2013.

* In the April Marketimer, Brinker again raised the target range  but was a bit vague about the time frame. He wrote: "This P/E ratio range leads to a 2012 Index price target range in the upper 1400s to low-1500s going forward."  

* In the May Marketimer, Brinker's target range remained the same, but he extended the time frame on this projection from "going forward" to "within the next 12 months." Which again, extends to May of 2013. 

The stock market dropped to a three-month low today and Marketwatch is blaming it on worries about Greece. According to Brinker that shouldn't matter.  However yesterday, Brinker may have begun to lay the groundwork for another "exogenous event," which is his fail-safe excuse for when  his "timing model©" misses another major correction or bear.  (In the Moneytalk summary posted just below, Jeffchristie covered the Jamie Dimon - JP Morgan issue that Brinker talked about extensively yesterday.) 









Sunday, May 13, 2012

May 13, 2012, Bob Brinker's Moneytalk: Summary, Excerpts and Commentary

May 13, 2012....Bob Brinker hosted Moneytalk today.  Since this is Mother's Day, I am very grateful to guest-writer, Jeffchristie (pen-name), for writing the show summary.

Jeffchristie wrote: 

Bob Brinker began today's show by wishing all of the mothers a happy Mother's Day.   Then he talked about the CEO of JP Morgan Chase being raked over the coals for reporting a $2 billion loss.  Jamie Dimon was the Wall Street banking golden boy but is no more.  Bob thought there could be another billion dollars in losses that haven't been reported yet.  Mr. Dimon has said egregious mistakes were made and they were self-inflicted.

Bob was particularly upset that Jamie Dimon was on the board of directors for the New York Federal Reserve.  Brinker said he should resign because it was a conflict of interest.  This made me wonder how many other bank presidents were Directors of Federal Reserve Banks and Branches.  Here is what I found:

http://www.federalreserve.gov/generalinfo/listdirectors/

The first caller was Frank from Virginia.  He wanted to start a savings account for his grandson.  Bob ask how old is the young sprout.  Frank said 14.  Bob suggested he open a uniform gifts to minors account and put the money into a low cost total stock market index fund.

Doug called from Jackson.  He wanted to know if the insurance provided for credit unions was as sound as FDIC insurance.  Bob said it was and Doug noted that some credit unions offered CD rates 1/4 to 1/2 a percentage point higher than his local banks.


Bob talked about one of the founders of Facebook renouncing his US citizenship thus avoiding capital gains taxes.  He has been under criticism for doing so.  Here is an article from a WSJ Blog on the subject. 

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2012/05/13/facebook-co-founder-america-is-ok-its-the-rules-that-are-a-pain/

Charles called from Buffalo.  He wanted to know if there was any risk in continuing to do business with JP Morgan Chase.  Bob said a way to tell if a Bank was in real trouble is to look at the price of its common stock.  Since JP Morgan Chase was trading in the 30's he does not see a major problem today.

Todd called from Chicago.  He was upset that the Facebook founder would be paying zero taxes on his stock.  Bob set him straight by pointing out that he would still have to pay taxes on the cost of his stock as of 30 April based on the value on that date.  Todd made some further comments but there was some beeps where you couldn't hear what he was saying.  Bob made it clear that he had nothing to do with the beeps.

Telephone problems continued with the next caller Jeff in San Francisco.  Bob determined that the problem was with Jeff's cell phone.

Bob discussed the current fiscal crisis in California.  The new estimate is for a budget deficit of $16 billion.  The previous estimate for this year was $9 billion.  The governor is attributing the problem to the slow pace of the recovery.  Bob noted that the sales tax in California was the highest in the nation and there will be a proposition on the ballot to increase it even more as well as increases to state income tax for high earners.  If this doesn't pass there will be cuts to education.

Bob's guest in the third hour was Daniel Franklin. His book is: Megachange: The World in 2050 (The Economist)

On the lighter side here is today's Moneytalk final exam question.

Bob Brinker refers to children as:

A) Ankle Biters

B) Rug Rats

C) Young Sprouts

D) Crib Lizards

Honey here: Thank you so much for the great summary, Jeff!  And I really enjoyed this week's Final Exam Question too.  It's difficult though --  I'll just have to guess that the answer is "young sprouts."  :)

Wednesday, May 9, 2012

May 9, 2012, Bob Brinker Says No, but ECRI Says Recession by mid-2012

May 9, 2012, If you have been reading my weekly Bob Brinker Moneytalk show summaries, you know that Bob Brinker is adamant that Lakshman Achuthan, CEO of Economic Cycle Research Institute is absolutely wrong in his recession prediction. Brinker has even stated that he is waiting for the recession bears to apologize. The assumption is that Brinker wants the apology to go to those who "were scared out of the market."

Today, Lakshmann Achuthan appeared on Bloomberg TV and said we are still headed for a recession:
 *Achuthan and Blodget discuss ECRI's call for recession to begin by mid 2012, and how it typically takes about six months after a recession begins before you see a negative GDP print in the rear-view mirror.
* For the last three months, year-over-year growth in real personal income has stayed lower than it was at the beginning of each of the last ten recessions. In other words, this is what personal income growth typically looks like early in a recession".

* Has personal income growth ever remained this low for three months without the economy going into recession? The answer is no."



Read more about this ongoing "disagreement":  Lakshman and Bob in the Thunderdome. 2 men enter, one man leaves. 



Monday, May 7, 2012

May 7, 2012, Bob Brinker's Moneytalk Summary Part Two

May 7, 2012..................................................................(comments welcome)

Yesterday, Bob Brinker commented on the subject of "seasonality" in the stock market. He called it "fiction" (read his comments in my show summary part one).  David Korn covered this subject in his weekly newsletter that includes a summary of Bob Brinker's Moneytalk. David has generously  given me permission to share this with you: 

David Korn wrote:

A SIX MONTH STOCK MARKET TIMING STRATEGY - A DAVID KORN PRIMER

************************************************************

"Those who study market history are bound to profit from it."

- Jeffrey A. Hirsch, Co-Editor of Stock Trader's Almanac

"In the stock market, those who expect history to repeat itself exactly are
doomed to failure."

- Yale Hirsch, Co-Editor of Stock Trader's Almanac

************************************************************

Introduction:  May marks the beginning of what some investors view as the
seasonally weak part of the year for stock market returns.  I have updated
my research on this market phenomenon and include it below as a David Korn
primer on the subject.  Charter subscribers will be familiar with the
tenants, but there is always something new to consider and I learn a new
fact every time I re-write this piece.  There are a couple of newsletters
and advisors that make a living off of this particular strategy, so they may
have an interest in the data.  Not me.  I am my own show and just try to
tell it like I see it.

Much of the data was originally collected by Yale Hirsch, editor of the
Stock Trader's Almanac, but the phenomenon actually has much older roots.
Like most David K. Primers, I like to utilize a Q&A format in an effort to
anticipate the questions you might have about the strategy.

Question:  David, what the heck are you talking about?

Answer:  I will forgive your informality if you will forgive mine.
Essentially, there is a fascinating historical pattern showing that most of
the stock market's gains occur during the time frame that begins November
1st and ends April 30th of each year.  Conversely, the time period between
May 1st and October 31st have generally not produced favorable returns in
the equity markets.

Question:  Isn't this referred to by another name?

Answer:  Not just one other name, several.  The first I ever heard of it,
was a reference to the "Seasons in the Sun" strategy, presumably because it
refers to the fact that you rotate out of stocks during the summer months
when the sun is shining bright.  Another popular phrase for this strategy is
the "Halloween Indicator" for the obvious reason that the strategy turns on
Halloween each year, at least as celebrated in the United States.  The Stock
Trader's Almanac refers to it as the "Best Six Month's Strategy" and Sy
Harding, another well-known follower of its tenants, calls it the "Seasonal
Timing Strategy." 

Some use an idiom to remind them what to do  -- "Sell in May and Go Away."
Indeed, investors have coupled the "Sell in May and Go Away" phrase with
"but buy back on St. Leger Day."  St. Leger Day refers to the date of a
classic horse race that has been run every September since 1776.   Even our
northern neighbors in Canada have a saying for this phenomenon -- "Buy when
it snows, sell when it goes."

Question:  Do you have any statistics to show if this strategy works?

Answer:  I knew would ask that -- probably because I wrote the question.
According to the Stock Trader's Almanac, if you invested in the stock market
from November through April, and switched to fixed-income investments from
May to October, over a 62-year period (1950-2009), your returns would have
been quite dramatic.  Using this strategy, a $10,000 investment in the Dow
Jones Industrial Average produced a compounded annual return of $619,071
gain in the November - April period, versus a loss of $9,621 for the
May-October period.   That is pretty amazing.

Source, Stock Trader's Almanac.  Yale Hirsch & Jeffrey A. Hirsch, Editors.

http://www.StockTradersAlmanac.com/

A little less biased source, Standard & Poor¹s Equity Research did research
and found that the market has returned 1.3% on average during the
April-September time frame versus the October ­ March time frame when the
U.S. stock market has a 6.7% average return.  Note that their time frame
modifies the sell and buy points by about a month.

Question:  David, has anyone looked at the data for the United States market
beyond the 54-year period referenced by the Hirsch Organization?

Answer:  Yes.  In 1991, Michael O'Higgins looked at data from 1925 through
1989 and observed that 85% of the capital gains, excluding dividends, was
earned in the Dow during the October 31st through April 30th time frame.
Higgins came up with some inventive strategies to optimize it by using
various proxies, such as the five highest yielding Dow stocks.  Mr.
O'Higgins' data was included in his book, "Beating the Dow" which was
updated in 2000. To learn more about it, this url brings you to the book's
profile on Amazon.com:

http://tinyurl.com/b6ssg

Question:  But David, isn't this risky business?

Answer:  I'll answer this as any good Hollywood Scientologist might.  Any
type of market timing involves risk of under performing a fully invested
position.  This particular strategy, however, involves taking half of the
normal market risk since you are only invested in the stock market six
months of the year.  That said, recent years have been a perfect example of
how this strategy can be fantastic but also make you miss out on the good
stuff. 

Recall that the ultimate high of the market ever was October 9, 2007.  That
was just a few weeks before the ³best six months² started.  On the other
hand, if you got out of the market in May 2008 and stayed out through the
end of October 2008, you missed out on a lot of carnage during the
May-November 2008 timeframe.  But then the May-October 2009 was a fantastic
period for the market.  You see how this works huh?

Question:  Has this seasonal strategy produced similar results in other
countries? 

Answer:  It actually has. In fact, there is a study that examined monthly
returns for the U.K. stock market back to 1693 ‹ that¹s 317 years of data!.
Turns out this strategy beat the market 71% of the time over all two year
periods and 82% over five year periods.  Pretty impressive.  Here is a link
to the article entitled, ³Are Monthly Seasons Real? A Three Century
Perspective²

http://tinyurl.com/26soyog

Question:  Any other serious academic research done into this phenomenon?

Answer:  In one fascinating academic study I found on this issue, the
research showed that stock market returns were higher in the November -
April period versus the May - October period in 36 of 37 countries studied.
Did you hear me right?  Or perhaps I should say, did you read me right?  In
36 of 37 countries!  This study concluded that the effect seemed to be
strongly related to the length and timing of vacations, especially in
Europe.  This study was written by Ben Jacobsen from the Rotterdam School of
Management, and AEGON Asset Management and is entitled, "The Halloween
Indicator, 'Sell in May and Go Away': Another Puzzle."  This link will bring
you to an abstract of the article:

http://tinyurl.com/6e4tl

It does bear noting that this study was based on data beginning in 1970
because that is when much of the data for worldwide stock markets became
readily accessible and more importantly reliable.

Question:  David, what do you think could be causing this phenomenon?

Answer:  I have seen many explanations for the phenomenon.  Here are some of
the reasons that are offered:

1)  As noted in the study I previously cited, during the summer months which
occupy the worst 6 months for investing, everyone is on vacation, hence the
lack of "buying" interest in the market.

2) Investors tend to come into extra cash in the time frame between November
1st and April 30th due to year-end bonuses and distributions, income tax
refunds, company contributions to retirements and profit sharing plans.  Of
course, this wouldn't explain why the phenomenon seems to work in other
countries.

3) The Infernal Revenue Code encourages retirement contributions between
January 1st and April 30th.

4) Mutual fund inflows tend to be less during the summer months.  As
reported on theStreetcom, since 1984, 62% of all mutual fund inflows have
occurred between November and April.  In the secular bear market that
occurred during 1966 to 1982, monies invested solely in the May though
October time frame fell nearly 85% on an inflation adjusted basis:

http://tinyurl.com/apq6

5)  Several entities have suggested that seasonal factors that influence
economic data might help explain the seasonal cycles in stocks.  Here is a
link to one such article entitled, aptly, ³Seasonality²:

http://tinyurl.com/nhapbr

6)  The Hirsch organization suggests this seasonality is based on the
"habitual behavior of society, which extends to stocks."  With respect to
the poor performance during the May-November time frame, Jeffrey Hirsch
notes that the second quarter tends to be weaker as the positive effects of
holiday bonuses and the holiday retail sales period fade out, and a "spring
cleaning mentality kicks in."

7)  A final explanation offered is a seemingly obvious one.  This is a
pattern that is widely recognized, and people have decided to follow it.
There have been many publications (including yours truly) that regularly
report on this strategy.

Question:  David, has anyone ever used a combination of technical analysis
and market timing to improve on this strategy?

Answer:  Funny you should ask, I was just preparing a response to that very
question.  It appears that editor and subscriber have reached a symbiotic
relationship.

Sy Harding, editor of Street Smart Report, and author of the book, Riding
the Bear, uses the Moving Average Convergence/Divergence indicator (MACD) to
try and enhance the Six Months Strategy by picking a better entry and exit
point, instead of simply relying on the rigid May 1st and October 31st buy
and sell dates.  Using the MACD, the sell signal could come a day or even
several weeks before or after May 1st, and the buy signal could come in the
days or weeks before or after October 31st.  Mr. Harding's system has been
so successful, that he has calls it, the "Best Mechanical System Ever."
Mr. Harding calls his strategy the Seasonal Timing Strategy or "STS
Portfolio" and he uses the DJIA Index for the model's measurement.  Over the
last 13 years, through the end of December, 2011, Sy claims that his STS
Portfolio has produced compound returns of 190.6% versus 64.4% gain for the
S&P 500 and a 18.8% gain for the Nasdaq.  Sy Harding has a fairly in depth
discussion of this system on his web site which you can access at the
following link:

http://www.streetsmartreport.com/sts.html

The Hirsch Organization over at the Stock Trader's Almanac are well aware
that Sy Harding is marketing the Best Six Months strategy using the MACD
indicator.  In fact, they even reference his use of it on their web site at
this link: 

http://tinyurl.com/yzepqs

Since they know a good marketing tool when they see it, STA now offers their
own market timing newsletter based on their version of the MACD indicator
using the Six Month Strategy.  So, we have competing newsletter writers, all
of whom are desperate to have the better timing on the Best Six Months.  Now
we have some drama and competition.

Question:  David, has the application of the MACD enhanced the Best Six
Months strategy over the long haul?

Answer:  The Hirsch Organization back-tested this method from 1950-2010.
According to their research, applying the MACD signal produced what can only
be characterized as astounding results.  Check it out at this url:

http://tinyurl.com/yfqb8ep

Question:  David, whose system is better, Sy Harding or the Hirsch
Organization?

Answer:  Mark Hulbert actually took up that question and concluded that Sy
Harding's system is superior due to his better timing of the exit and entry
points.  Read his article entitled, "Selling in May and not going away?" at
this url:

http://tinyurl.com/6nr853

Question:  Does anyone find fault in the best six months timing strategy?

Answer:  Yes.  The Schwab Center for Investment Research (SCIR) looked at
this strategy and found that the S&P 500's average MONTHLY return was higher
(1.2%) for the November to April period, and lower (0.8%) for the May to
October period.  Moreover, SCIR concluded that simply remaining fully
invested in the S&P 500 outperformed a seasonal portfolio more than half of
the time.  SCIR concluded that "time in the market" is much more important
than "timing the market" especially when you consider the transaction costs
and tax consequences.  The article used to be available online, but it is
gone now.  And you heard Bob Brinker this weekend on Moneytalk say that the
system is nonsense.  There are definitely skeptics out there.

Question:  If you follow this strategy, and sell your stocks at the
beginning of May, is there any place you should put it other than cash?

EC:  The original advice was cash or Treasuries.  However, there are many
things you can do.  If you really thought the stock market was going down,
you could purchase put options on the market or buy a contra-fund ­ both
very risky if the market moves up.  Here is a good article just recently
published entitled, ³Sell in May and Do This Instead²:

http://tinyurl.com/7tqxabj

Question: How has this strategy done lately?

Answer:  It¹s performed great recently.  Selling in May last year was almost
perfect timing as April 30th marked a high and the market plunged for almost
five months.  Even after huge 10% move up in October, the Dow lost about 7%
form May-November and has gained over 10% since then when the calendar
switched over to a buy signal.  2010 was also a great year for the system.
Stocks gained only 1% from May to November but then took off in the six
months that followed.  The Dow gained 15.2% from the end of October 2010
through the end of April, and then while safely in cash from April 30th on
-- well, you saw how the market performed.  Of course, past performance is
not a guarantee of future results.

Question:  David, what do YOU think about this strategy?

Answer and Conclusion:  Frankly, I believe that there is some merit to this
phenomenon.  Of course, it could just be a statistical anomaly, but if it
is, that's one heck of an anomaly.  There is also a bit of trying to
outguess each other as to when the trigger points to enter/exit the market
will take place.  You should also keep in mind that this timing strategy is
actually pretty conservative on a risk-adjusted basis given that you are out
of the market for half the year.   Finally, like all timing systems, there
is no "Holy Grail" when it comes to investing.  I firmly believe that you
should never rely on one single factor when analyzing any stock, timing
system, or investment strategy in general.  Nevertheless, I also think you
can never have too many tools in your investment arsenal.  All in all, I
think the Best Six Months strategy is worthy of being aware of, and warrants
consideration if you are adopting a timing approach to investing.

David Korn's Stock Market Commentary, Interpretation of Moneytalk (Bob
Brinker Host), Financial Education, Helpful Links, Guest Editorials, and
Special Alert E-Mail Service.  Copyright David Korn, L.L.C. 2012


Honey here:  You can request complimentary issues of David's weekly newsletter and The Retirement Advisor published by Kirk Lindstrom and David Korn.

Bob Brinker was late arriving at the studio yesterday so Jeffchristie has a new Moneytalk Final Exam question: 
 * Bob Brinker was over an hour late for work Sunday.  Some people have suggested that his car broke down on the way to the studio.  Bob  drives:

A) AMC Gremlin

B) Prius

C) Edsel

D) Ford F-150 complete with gun rack

Sunday, May 6, 2012

May 6, 2012, Bob Brinker's Moneytalk, Summary, Excerpts and Commentary

May 6, 2012................................................................(comments welcome)

 For the first hour and 20 minutes, Bob Brinker's Moneytalk Show was spliced together re-runs of very old programs going back to 2010. But as usual, there was no disclosure from him or the station.   And there was no  disclaimer stating that some of the information was no longer reliable or accurate.

For example, in the recorded opening segment, Brinker said: "Another thing we've talked about on Moneytalk over the years is Inflation Protected Securities....We include a portion of our balanced portfolio in our investment letter and our fixed income portfolio in my investment letter, we include Inflation Protected Securities in that portfolio."

Brinker sold all Inflation Protected Securities from all Marketimer portfolios in January 2011. Also note that portions of today's recordings were from back when he still used the term "fixed income portfolio." He changed that to "income portfolio" after it was pointed out on this blog that the Wellesley Income Fund added in January 2011 contained about 35% equities. 

Why the cloak and dagger?  This is the only radio talk show program I have ever heard that doesn't announce "best of, please do not call."  Maybe I'm just nosy, but I think it would have been nice for Brinker to have told listeners why he suddenly broke into the program twenty minutes into the SECOND hour and proceeded as though he had been there all along.


FROM THE LIVE PORTION OF MONEYTALK WITH BOB BRINKER:

KEEP MINIMUM OF 30% ALLOCATED TO STOCK MARKET....Caller Dave said that he and his wife were 75 years old and only 14% in stocks, the rest was in bonds and cash. Brinker replied:  "I think you're light in the equity market.....14% is a very small number.....Obviously, at your point in life, you're going to be a balanced investor....Are you going to be a balanced investor that has at least some appreciable participation in the equity market. The bottom number I would use is 30%....Here in May 2012, if I was in your shoes, I would have 30% of your money in the equity market. You can do this easily by including balanced fund.....Vanguard has a fund called Vanguard Balanced Fund that's a very simple and low-cost way to include that kind of thing inside of your portfolio."

Honey EC: Brinker does not include the Vanguard Balanced Fund in any of his model portfolios. Instead, Vanguard Wellesley Income Fund is in his income portfolio and his model portfolio III.

 It's apparent from Brinker's comments to Dave that he is still very bullish on the stock market, which he confirmed in the April, 2012 Marketimer when he raised his S&P 500 target range to "upper 1400s to low-1500s."   In the  May 3, 2012 issue of  Marketimer, Brinker extended the time frame on this projection from "going forward" to "within the next 12 months." 

IT'S FICTION: SELL IN MAY GO AWAY - SEASONALITY   Brinker said "One of the things you're going to be hearing about going forward is about the seasonality of the market. This is one of the great myths of Wall Street....The facts do not bear it out and yet people continue to promote it as though it were true even though it is not true. The seasonality that I speak of is the seasonality that the market goes down from May to October every year. Of course, this is nonsense. I wanted to share some statistics with you on this. To prove the point. If you go back about six decades plus...to middle of last century and check the S&P 500 from the beginning of May to the beginning of October, and  here's what you will find. On 60% of the occasions -- 6 out of 10 basically the market is either up -- usually up or else it is even. And in only 4 out of 10 cases was it down during that time. So you see, fiction is fiction is fiction."

WILL STOCK MARKET REACT NEGATIVELY TO FRANCE GOING SOCIALIST? Caller Stan from California asked Brinker: "I was wondering what you thought the markets will do in reaction to the election today in France and Greece." 

Brinker replied: "I think Greece is a lost cause, a bankrupt nation. When you are paying 20% a year on your ten year sovereign debt, you're bankrupt nation.....I am dumbfounded by the early results of the election in France.....They show that the Socialist candidate, Francois Hollande, is going to win.....For me personally, I think they have made a big mistake for their country.....I will say this so that everyone hears it clearly: This is a great day NOT to be a Frenchmen."  

Honey EC: So the French want their goodies, never mind their country is going down the tubes like Greece. There are already reports that "the rich" are leaving France. Are Socialists evil or just plain stupid?  Are you listening Washington and Sacramento?  

Brinker then answered Stan's market question: "The US market is a function of  the corporate earning power of the companies that are primarily based in the United States....The present value of today's common stocks in the United States are dependent on the future estimates of their earnings and their dividends. They are not based on who the president of France is, Stan. That would be an absurd notion to say. What you are suggesting is that the US stock market depended on who's in the president's office in France. That's ridiculous....The stability of Europe is already in doubt. This is nothing new here....Believe me, the notion that the United States stock market is going to rise or fall depending on who the president of France is -- that is not what powers the US stock market." 

Honey EC: Was Brinker blowing smoke? Stock market futures can turn on a dime, but tonight they are down BIG TIME.  

FED DOESN'T CARE ABOUT SAVERS....Brinker said: "The priority at the Fed is to keep the interest rates down to stimulate the economy and create jobs.....I have to tell you straight out. They are not worrying about the savers. Those  of you that are trying to get the most you can safely out of the income portfolio. They're really not focusing on you. That's the reality......They have a dual mandate that congress has presented to them -- to maximize employment consistent with low inflation." 

Honey EC: It's amazing how little concern there is for those who work, save and pay their bills, including mortgages. Those are the people who pay most of the freight for all the free lunches that are growing by leaps and bounds. 

 Brinker's guest author was Lori AndrewsI Know Who You Are and I Saw What You Did: Social Networks and the Death of Privacy

Moneytalk on Demand is available for FREE at KSFO 560 for seven days after broadcast.  
 

Jeffchristie's Moneytalk Final Exam Question of the day:
Bob Brinker thinks the absolute worst investment is:

A)  Commodity futures.
B)  Greek bonds.
C)  Whole life insurance.
D)  Nevada real estate.